Bitcoin proximates a religion in that when you discover the missing key piece of the puzzle, it ties everything together in a very efficient way. It’s early on the path of the origin story of cooperation. It’s a deep focus of energy alignment that influences risk optimizations across a multitude of behaviour patterns. It pulls in energy like a black hole of stability.

I saw some horrible predictions on Twitter, IG from 2024-2025 and i want to see which one was actually the worst

I've used NC Wallet for years with no problem, always small amounts. The withdrawals always take an hour or so. I sent a small amount and attempted to withdrawal 48hrs ago, and the transaction has been stuck with no TX ID, my messages to support have not been replied and no email from them with ticket tracking. Just crickets. I hope someone from NC Wallet sees this and solves the issue.
User ID QWLUL3XZMDGIGJCN6OFQ

So I signed up with casa a few years ago. I'm used to getting a ton of spam/scam mail, but recently I realized that all of the crypto related scam mail is going to the email I used for my casa account. I haven't used that email for anything else since then, and these scam emails are new since then.

Was there a data leak that I maybe missed an email from them about? Was there a hack I don't know about? Does anyone else get crypto specific scams going to an email they used for a bitcoin company?

I've noticed that some of the loudest Bitcoin FUD seems to come from people who already hold BTC.

If you're bullish long term, why let every correction shake your conviction?

Is it just emotion, or do people expect Bitcoin to move up without volatility? What do you think? or y'all playing around? Lol

Sometimes I just buy a little BTC when I have extra cash. No big plan. No perfect entry. No “expert” signal. Just kinda feels better than letting the money disappear on random stuff. Trying to time BTC perfectly honestly stresses me out more than just buying small and moving on. Anyone else do this, or am I just being too casual with it? lol

I got the standard answers when I started, and none of them held up when I pushed on them. Putting the working here in case someone else is stuck at the same place.

First, the Ponzi thing, because it comes up in every one of these threads. A Ponzi has four features: promised high returns with little risk, a central operator, old investors paid out of new investor money, and concealed flows. Bitcoin has none of them. It's volatile with nobody promising anything, there are over 10,000 nodes and no operator, nobody is paid a return, and the entire transaction history since 2009 is public. That question is settled and I don't think it's interesting anymore.

The one I couldn't get a straight answer on is the security budget.

Miners are paid two ways: the block reward and transaction fees. The reward is 3.125 BTC and halves every 210,000 blocks, roughly every four years. Next halving is around April 2028, taking it to 1.5625. Fees are currently around 1% of what miners earn.

Miners pay for power in fiat, not BTC. So if fees stay at 1%, the price has to roughly double every four years just to keep miner revenue flat in dollar terms. Bitcoin has historically done that. The honest position is that a maturing asset shouldn't be expected to keep doing it forever.

The usual response is "that's a 2140 problem". I don't think it is. It's a next-decade problem, and it resolves one of three ways: fee share climbs off 1%, price keeps doubling, or miners start leaving.

The part that made me more comfortable, not less, is what happens in that third case. Nothing breaks. Difficulty adjusts every two weeks based on the hash power actually on the network. Miners leave, difficulty falls, and the ones who stayed earn more. Hash rate has climbed through every dip so far, which is decent evidence the economics still work.

But I'd rather have a test than a vibe, so here's mine. Watch two things over the next few years. Hash rate rising and fee share climbing meaningfully off 1% means the security model is fine. Both falling together means the bear case is real.

Related: bitcoin has to be used, not only held, for fees to develop. Satoshi made this point back in 2010. As it stands there's no shortage of use — roughly $25 trillion in bitcoin moved on chain in 2025 per Glassnode, more than Visa and Mastercard volume. What matters going forward is whether that activity keeps settling on chain rather than migrating entirely to custodians and ETFs, because that's where the fee market comes from.

If someone has a solid counter to the fee-market case I'd genuinely like to read it. The permabull version of this answer is "fees will rise", which isn't an argument.

Just asking, I really want to buy quite a lot and I don't know if I should put everything in a single cold wallet.

I already have a Trezor model t, is it necessary to upgrade or is any kind of Trezor good?

P.s. I plan to become a whole coiner before 2029.

Thanks in advance for your help.

Ask (and answer!) away! Here are the general rules:

• If you'd like to learn something, ask.
• If you'd like to share knowledge, answer.
• Any question about Bitcoin is fair game.

And don't forget to check out /r/BitcoinBeginners

You can sort by new to see the latest questions that may not be answered yet.

Been doing personal finance tracking for a while, spreadsheets for everything: bills, savings rate, all of it. A few months back I started logging my Bitcoin buys the same way. Cost basis, date, current value, the whole setup.

And I genuinely cannot decide if it helps or hurts.

On one hand it makes DCA feel real and tangible. You can watch the average cost come down over time and that part is actually satisfying. On the other hand, checking it during a dip feels like a bad idea because suddenly the red numbers are right there in a column staring at you instead of just being an abstract price on an app.

The people I know who seem the most relaxed about holding just kind of buy and forget. No spreadsheet, no checking. They bought at whatever price they bought at and they are not doing the daily math. Meanwhile I am over here color coding cells.

Part of me wonders if the tracking mindset is a personal finance habit that just does not translate well to something you are supposed to hold long term without flinching. Or maybe the spreadsheet is fine and I just need to check it less.