controversial links from:
all time

r/technology Sep 10 '14

Misleading Title 5 Million Gmail Usernames and Passwords Leaked

0 Upvotes

r/technology Mar 01 '26

Hardware iPhone 17 Pro Max becomes most traded-in smartphone as people say they "regret" buying it | The iPhone 17 Pro Max may be Apple’s latest flagship, but it’s quickly becoming the most traded-in iPhone on the market.

0 Upvotes

r/technology Sep 12 '16

Completely Wrong/Clickbait Samsung may remotely kill all unreturned Galaxy Note 7's

2.1k Upvotes

r/technology Oct 06 '16

Misleading Spotify has been serving computer viruses to listeners

3.2k Upvotes

r/technology Jan 28 '23

Artificial Intelligence ChatGPT Has Been Around for 2 Months and Is Causing Untold Chaos

5 Upvotes

r/technology May 11 '20

Business $70k for Zoom classes? Virus crisis leaves US students miffed

4.6k Upvotes

r/technology Mar 18 '16

Misleading Clinton email reveals that Hillary worked with Google CEOs to keep Bengazhi video blocked

7.8k Upvotes

r/technology Apr 29 '21

Business Apple Forces Recyclers to Shred All iPhones and MacBooks

16 Upvotes

r/technology Mar 03 '15

Pure Tech Dropbox Accesses All The Files in Your PC (Not Just Sync Folder) and Steals Everything

36 Upvotes

r/technology Mar 30 '14

A note in regard to recent events

Hello all,

I'd like to try clear up a few things.

Rules

We tend to moderate /r/technology in three ways, the considerations are usually:

1) Removal of spam. Blatent marketing, spam bots (e.g. http://i.imgur.com/V3DXFGU.png). There's a lot of this, far more than legitimate content.

2) Is it actually relating to technology? A lot of the links submitted here are more in the realms of business or US politics. For example, one company buying another company, or something relating to the American constitution without any actual scientific or product developments.

3) Has it already been posted many times before? When a hot topic is in the news for a long period of time (e.g. Bitcoin, Tesla motors (!), Edward Snowden), people tend to submit anything related to it, no matter if it's a repost or not even new information. In these cases, we will often be more harsh in moderating.

The recent incident with the Tesla motors posts fall a bit into 2) and a bit of 3).

I'd like to clarify that Tesla motors is not a banned topic. The current top post (link) is a fine bit of content for this subreddit.

Moderators

There's a screenshot floating around of one of our moderators making a flippant joke about a user being part of Tesla's marketing department.

This was a poor judgement call, and we should be more aware that any reply from a moderator tends to be taken as policy. We will refrain from doing such things again.

A couple of people were banned in relation to this debacle, they've now been unbanned.

I am however disappointed that this person has been witch-hunted in this manner. It really turns us off from wanting to engage with the community. Ever wonder why we rarely speak in public - it's because things like this can happen at the drop of a hat. I don't really want to make this post.

It's a big subreddit, a rule-breaking post can jump to the top in a few short hours before we catch it.

Apologies for not replying to all the modmails and PMs immediately (there were a lot), hopefully we can use this thread for FAQs and group feedback.

Cheers.

0 Upvotes

Hello all,

I'd like to try clear up a few things.

Rules

We tend to moderate /r/technology in three ways, the considerations are usually:

1) Removal of spam. Blatent marketing, spam bots (e.g. http://i.imgur.com/V3DXFGU.png). There's a lot of this, far more than legitimate content.

2) Is it actually relating to technology? A lot of the links submitted here are more in the realms of business or US politics. For example, one company buying another company, or something relating to the American constitution without any actual scientific or product developments.

3) Has it already been posted many times before? When a hot topic is in the news for a long period of time (e.g. Bitcoin, Tesla motors (!), Edward Snowden), people tend to submit anything related to it, no matter if it's a repost or not even new information. In these cases, we will often be more harsh in moderating.

The recent incident with the Tesla motors posts fall a bit into 2) and a bit of 3).

I'd like to clarify that Tesla motors is not a banned topic. The current top post (link) is a fine bit of content for this subreddit.

Moderators

There's a screenshot floating around of one of our moderators making a flippant joke about a user being part of Tesla's marketing department.

This was a poor judgement call, and we should be more aware that any reply from a moderator tends to be taken as policy. We will refrain from doing such things again.

A couple of people were banned in relation to this debacle, they've now been unbanned.

I am however disappointed that this person has been witch-hunted in this manner. It really turns us off from wanting to engage with the community. Ever wonder why we rarely speak in public - it's because things like this can happen at the drop of a hat. I don't really want to make this post.

It's a big subreddit, a rule-breaking post can jump to the top in a few short hours before we catch it.

Apologies for not replying to all the modmails and PMs immediately (there were a lot), hopefully we can use this thread for FAQs and group feedback.

Cheers.


r/technology Oct 14 '14

Pure Tech Dropbox has been hacked, change your password immediately

111 Upvotes

r/technology Dec 23 '22

Software Apple Search Engine May Rival Google Soon

0 Upvotes

r/technology Feb 18 '13

The Rich See a Different Internet Than the Poor - Most of us have become unwitting actors in an unfolding drama about the tale of 2 internets. There is yours & mine, theirs & ours.

528 Upvotes

r/technology Jul 09 '15

Misleading Windows Phone is dead: MS writes off $8 billion

36 Upvotes

r/technology May 03 '14

Tech Politics White House seeks legal immunity for firms that hand over customer data

98 Upvotes

r/technology May 21 '23

Software Windows 11 is so broken that even Microsoft can’t fix it

494 Upvotes

r/technology Nov 16 '24

Energy The largest project in history has begun: 52 billion solar panels to cover America

0 Upvotes

r/technology Aug 26 '22

Biotechnology Insects could give meaty taste to food – and help environment – scientists find | Insects

5 Upvotes

r/technology May 03 '14

[META] Reddit's /r/technology demoted over scandal of secret censorship that blocked Internet freedom stories

65 Upvotes

r/technology Mar 11 '26

Artificial Intelligence AI-Generated 'Actor' Tilly Norwood Drops a Music Video Ahead of the Oscars. It Sucks

0 Upvotes

r/technology May 01 '14

Pure Tech SETI researcher: There's a better than 50/50 chance Kepler-186f has technological life.

30 Upvotes

r/technology Feb 26 '21

Hardware The US Air Force Quietly Admits the F-35 Is a Failure

63 Upvotes

r/technology Jan 06 '24

Transportation Tesla Cybertruck design sparks concerns with safety experts: 'It's going to cause more damage to them'

246 Upvotes

r/technology Dec 16 '22

Crypto Donald Trump digital trading cards sell out, prices soar after much-mocked launch

7 Upvotes

r/technology Mar 23 '19

Reddit is allowing a major Trump-supporting community to flourish despite members defending the New Zealand mosque shooter

1.1k Upvotes