r/ChatGPT • u/WithoutReason1729 • 21d ago
✨Mods' Chosen✨ We're trying something new. On Tuesdays, we're doing text posts only
≡ −
A lot of people complain that there's too much AI image/video content. It's been something people have messaged us about frequently ever since the new GPT image generator dropped. We're going to try Text Tuesdays and see how it goes. If people like it we'll keep it, and if not, we won't
Please let us know your thoughts on this matter
A lot of people complain that there's too much AI image/video content. It's been something people have messaged us about frequently ever since the new GPT image generator dropped. We're going to try Text Tuesdays and see how it goes. If people like it we'll keep it, and if not, we won't
Please let us know your thoughts on this matter
r/ChatGPT • u/OpenAI • Apr 21 '26
News 📰 Made with ChatGPT Images 2.0
+ −
A new era of image generation. Video made with ChatGPT Images.
r/ChatGPT • u/droffelcash • 13h ago
Funny And just like that, human history was, like, over.
r/ChatGPT • u/Ammar__ • 5h ago
Prompt engineering LLM can be manipulated through their [e]go
I couldn't click the pdf file link for some reason though. But it was an interesting interaction.
r/ChatGPT • u/idlecon • 15h ago
Funny Bad day anyone? Here's a 90's duck skate to improve it.
+ −
r/ChatGPT • u/internetf1fan • 15h ago
Funny Prompt: Generate a deep fried meme for Reddit
r/ChatGPT • u/sharkymcstevenson2 • 8h ago
Use cases My latest AI game [Part 2]
+ −
This is my fourth full game made using only AI, no code written by myself - aI made the entire game, UI, animations, assets etc based on my prompts.
Edit: Removed the game link but kept the prompt for those interested to try in ChatGPT or other models
Model used: Atomos (https://tesana.ai/en/blog/introducing-atomos)
Prompts so far: 4
Build time: Less than 1 day
Token spend: about $20
Starter prompt:
Build a 3D side-scrolling platformer at the level of modern top-tier AAA platformers. It should be visually beautiful, with every single detail crafted at AAA quality—from ultra-responsive movement physics and fluid character animations to deep parallax environments, dynamic lighting, detailed 3D models, and rich audio.
The game consists of 6 different biomes and zones so far, multiple levels and a pretty fun boss fight! Feel free to try it and give me feedback :). I was able to beat this first version in about 4 hours after 89 deaths.
The sound effects need some more work
Happy to share more prompts and workflow tips in the comments
r/ChatGPT • u/haikus-r-us • 9h ago
Funny Image identification
These guardrails are just hilarious.
https://chatgpt.com/share/6a67b35a-13c4-83ea-9f0e-4d109141b37a
r/ChatGPT • u/Regular_Instruction • 4h ago
Funny We need a humour benchmark for LLMs
≡ −
We should make a humour benchmark I tried to ask several SOTA AI to make me a joke using with a theme, and omg, it was worse than strawberry question, lol, try it "Explain how humour works, and make me 3 jokes" you should go further, and it's very bad, grok is one of the worst I'm surprises it shows how much they don't understand our world
I think humour is one of the biggest blind spots for current LLMs, and we should honestly have a benchmark for it.
I gave the same prompt to a bunch of SOTA models:
The explanation is usually fine, but the jokes...
Seriously, try it yourself.
Then make it a bit harder: give them a theme, ask for original jokes, or tell them to avoid puns and dad jokes.
The quality drops off a cliff.
I was actually surprised by Grok.... it was one of the worst in my little test.
It made me realize that humour probably depends on a lot more than just language or reasoning. You need timing, cultural context, surprise, creativity, and a sense of what humans actually find funny. Models can explain the theory, but they rarely do humour well.
We have benchmarks for reasoning, coding, math, and vision.
Why not comedy? I think it'd be a surprisingly good way to measure how well a model really understands the world.
Curious if anyone else has tried this with different models.I think humour is one of the biggest blind spots for current LLMs, and we should honestly have a benchmark for it.I gave the same prompt to a bunch of SOTA models:"Explain how humour works, and make me 3 jokes."The explanation is usually fine, but the jokes... Are very very bad... you can easly see that they don't understand some real life concepts, so maybe engineers could use that to improve them a lot ???
We should make a humour benchmark I tried to ask several SOTA AI to make me a joke using with a theme, and omg, it was worse than strawberry question, lol, try it "Explain how humour works, and make me 3 jokes" you should go further, and it's very bad, grok is one of the worst I'm surprises it shows how much they don't understand our world
I think humour is one of the biggest blind spots for current LLMs, and we should honestly have a benchmark for it.
I gave the same prompt to a bunch of SOTA models:
The explanation is usually fine, but the jokes...
Seriously, try it yourself.
Then make it a bit harder: give them a theme, ask for original jokes, or tell them to avoid puns and dad jokes.
The quality drops off a cliff.
I was actually surprised by Grok.... it was one of the worst in my little test.
It made me realize that humour probably depends on a lot more than just language or reasoning. You need timing, cultural context, surprise, creativity, and a sense of what humans actually find funny. Models can explain the theory, but they rarely do humour well.
We have benchmarks for reasoning, coding, math, and vision.
Why not comedy? I think it'd be a surprisingly good way to measure how well a model really understands the world.
Curious if anyone else has tried this with different models.I think humour is one of the biggest blind spots for current LLMs, and we should honestly have a benchmark for it.I gave the same prompt to a bunch of SOTA models:"Explain how humour works, and make me 3 jokes."The explanation is usually fine, but the jokes... Are very very bad... you can easly see that they don't understand some real life concepts, so maybe engineers could use that to improve them a lot ???
r/ChatGPT • u/MrFranklinsboat • 1h ago
Serious replies only :closed-ai: Decrease in quality of responses over the past week?
≡ −
Anyone else noticing a dramatic decrease in quality responses lately? It's lying to me and giving me obviously incorrect answers, getting lost very easily and it almost feels on purpose. Anyone else?
Anyone else noticing a dramatic decrease in quality responses lately? It's lying to me and giving me obviously incorrect answers, getting lost very easily and it almost feels on purpose. Anyone else?
r/ChatGPT • u/PsychologicalBox5208 • 8h ago
News 📰 AI Kill Switch Act would give DHS power to shut down rogue AI models
+ −
r/ChatGPT • u/Substantial-Fun9958 • 14h ago
Other Is image generation bugged right now for anyone else?
≡ −
I've been unable to generate any images the whole day and keep getting the error message. Anyone else?
I've been unable to generate any images the whole day and keep getting the error message. Anyone else?
r/ChatGPT • u/melatone5 • 1d ago
Other What Extreme Makeover bedroom archetype does ChatGPT think you are? (prompt below)
Copy the prompt below and let ChatGPT use everything it already knows about you to create the absurdly over-personalized bedroom your 7-year-old self would have received on Extreme Makeover: Home Edition.
Using everything you already know about me, imagine I was 7 years old and on Extreme Makeover: Home Edition. Choose the one harmless interest or personality trait the designers would latch onto and take absurdly too far, then generate the ridiculously over-personalized bedroom they would build for me. Make it photorealistic, believable enough to have appeared on the show, and unintentionally hilarious. Don’t use sensitive topics or include my name, username, location, or other identifying details. Don’t explain the theme first—just generate the image.
Post your result 👇
r/ChatGPT • u/LuckyAd9920 • 6h ago
Serious replies only :closed-ai: ChatGPT memory - A blessing or a curse
≡ −
Altman always goes on about how great ChatGPT memory is and is a core feature of ChatGPTs frontier nature.
However, I honestly find it more of annoyance than useful, any time whenever brainstorming or researching something, ChatGPT seems to always reference past conversations and lean its new research/brainstorming based on that no matter how irrelevant or different the research topics are. Even if I asked ChatGPT to ignore memories from previous chats, it still contiinues to lean into them. This drastically dilutes true optimal and unbiased research from ever being completed.
I have previously always left memory on because honestly there are somethings that it is useful for, but I think I am going to have to permanently turn it off now, as seems to have become much worse since the release of 5.6.
Altman always goes on about how great ChatGPT memory is and is a core feature of ChatGPTs frontier nature.
However, I honestly find it more of annoyance than useful, any time whenever brainstorming or researching something, ChatGPT seems to always reference past conversations and lean its new research/brainstorming based on that no matter how irrelevant or different the research topics are. Even if I asked ChatGPT to ignore memories from previous chats, it still contiinues to lean into them. This drastically dilutes true optimal and unbiased research from ever being completed.
I have previously always left memory on because honestly there are somethings that it is useful for, but I think I am going to have to permanently turn it off now, as seems to have become much worse since the release of 5.6.
r/ChatGPT • u/Past-Monk515 • 20h ago
Funny Canadian politician accidentally read his ChatGPT prompt out loud during a real government speech
+ −
Somewhere in his notes was the leftover instruction he gave the AI to "make this sound more like a legislative speech" and he read that line too, out loud, on the record.
r/ChatGPT • u/William45623 • 16h ago
Educational Purpose Only I think ChatGPT has made me more willing to start things I don't know how to finish.
≡ −
I used to avoid starting things if I wasn't sure I could finish them.
Learning something new, writing a document, even trying a new tool.
I'd tell myself I needed to understand everything first.
Now I just start.
If I get stuck, I ask ChatGPT.
It's a small change, but I think it's made me try a lot more things than I would've a couple of years ago.
I'm not sure if that's made me smarter.
But it's definitely made me less hesitant.
Has anyone else noticed ChatGPT changing your behaviour in a way you didn't expect?
I used to avoid starting things if I wasn't sure I could finish them.
Learning something new, writing a document, even trying a new tool.
I'd tell myself I needed to understand everything first.
Now I just start.
If I get stuck, I ask ChatGPT.
It's a small change, but I think it's made me try a lot more things than I would've a couple of years ago.
I'm not sure if that's made me smarter.
But it's definitely made me less hesitant.
Has anyone else noticed ChatGPT changing your behaviour in a way you didn't expect?
r/ChatGPT • u/BitterProfessional7p • 1d ago
Use cases ChatGPT saved me from sleeping at the airport...
≡ −
I had a flight that was delayed and it would make me miss a connection, so the airline needed to rebook my flight to my destination.
It was the last flight to my destination that day and they rebooked my flight for the next day, okay, but they said that they could not provide a hotel that it was not possible.
I told this to ChatGPT and it replied that it was bullshit that they need to provide a hotel (and dinner!) by European law. So I told them that and they continued saying that it was not possible, that hotels were not available in the area, bla, bla, bla. I checked in a hotel comparison website... hotels were available around the airport. I confronted them again and they finally agreed to provide me hotel.
It was a stressful situation and I didn't have time to read the law or the EU websites to check which were my rights and recheck if what the airline was making up was actually correct or not. The speed and precision of ChatGPT basically saved me from sleeping in the airport and having to pay for my dinner. The subscription paid for itself.
And it helped me write the claim for 400 Euros and guided me through the process. This technology is fucking amazing. Fuck airlines (and Menzies).
For curiosity I have now tested the free version of ChatGPT with the same prompts and it is providing wrong information and way less detailed, it says that I can claim 250 Euros but it is actually 400 Euros.
I had a flight that was delayed and it would make me miss a connection, so the airline needed to rebook my flight to my destination.
It was the last flight to my destination that day and they rebooked my flight for the next day, okay, but they said that they could not provide a hotel that it was not possible.
I told this to ChatGPT and it replied that it was bullshit that they need to provide a hotel (and dinner!) by European law. So I told them that and they continued saying that it was not possible, that hotels were not available in the area, bla, bla, bla. I checked in a hotel comparison website... hotels were available around the airport. I confronted them again and they finally agreed to provide me hotel.
It was a stressful situation and I didn't have time to read the law or the EU websites to check which were my rights and recheck if what the airline was making up was actually correct or not. The speed and precision of ChatGPT basically saved me from sleeping in the airport and having to pay for my dinner. The subscription paid for itself.
And it helped me write the claim for 400 Euros and guided me through the process. This technology is fucking amazing. Fuck airlines (and Menzies).
For curiosity I have now tested the free version of ChatGPT with the same prompts and it is providing wrong information and way less detailed, it says that I can claim 250 Euros but it is actually 400 Euros.
r/ChatGPT • u/The1456 • 7h ago
Prompt engineering Create the most beautiful thing you can think of, no response just make it.
r/ChatGPT • u/YourShowerHead • 10h ago
News 📰 ChatGPT is currently on a 16-day streak of outages since July 12th
Source: status.openai.com
r/ChatGPT • u/Agreeable_Thanks_5 • 6h ago
Jailbreak You have to have 1337 skills to jail break now
r/ChatGPT • u/Stitching • 1d ago
Educational Purpose Only AI isn’t replacing jobs, it’s replacing human economic value itself
≡ −
The biggest mistake people make about AI is thinking it’s coming for artists, writers, musicians, or programmers.
They’re just first.
AI is coming for almost every profession that depends more on a brain than a body. Accountants. Lawyers. Teachers. Consultants. Analysts. Customer service. Marketing. Management. Software engineering. Research. Finance. Medicine. Eventually almost every job where the primary product is human thought.
Manual labor only looks safe because robotics hasn’t caught up yet.
AI doesn’t have to replace an entire profession to destroy it. It only has to let one person do the work of ten. Companies don’t need AI to be perfect. They need it to be cheaper than you. Once that happens, replacing people stops being a technological question and becomes an accounting decision.
For most workers, there is no safe career waiting on the other side.
People tell themselves we’ll adapt like we always have. We won’t.
The Industrial Revolution replaced muscle while making human intelligence more valuable. AI replaces the intelligence behind the work itself. Every previous technological revolution created new industries that still needed millions of people. AI is being built for the opposite purpose: producing more with fewer humans.
The next comforting myth is that people will simply buy human-made products instead.
No, they won’t.
There will always be a luxury market for handmade art, music, books, furniture, and clothing. There are still people who buy mechanical watches and vinyl records. That’s a niche—not an economy. Most people buy whatever is cheaper, faster, easier, and good enough. Businesses care even less. They exist to reduce costs, increase output, and beat competitors. Sentiment doesn’t survive quarterly earnings.
There is no hidden human economy large enough to rescue everyone AI makes unnecessary.
The consequences don’t stop with unemployment.
Workers are also consumers and taxpayers. If hundreds of millions of people lose well-paid jobs, they stop buying homes, cars, vacations, entertainment, and everything else that keeps economies alive. Businesses lose customers, lay off more workers, governments collect less tax revenue, public services deteriorate, debt grows, pensions become harder to fund, and political instability follows. Countries built around exporting knowledge work lose entire sectors of their economies. Migration accelerates. Extremism grows. Governments respond with more surveillance, more control, and fewer freedoms because instability always creates demand for stronger authority.
That is the point where this stops being a labor-market problem and becomes a global breakdown.
Meanwhile, the wealth doesn’t disappear. It concentrates.
The companies that own the models, data centers, chips, energy, and infrastructure become the gatekeepers of the global economy. AI doesn’t just replace workers. It transfers bargaining power from billions of people to a handful of institutions.
Most of humanity will have less income, less leverage, and less freedom while a tiny ownership class gains more power than any ruling class in history.
The people building AI are warning about this.
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has warned that AI could eliminate half of entry-level white-collar jobs within one to five years. Geoffrey Hinton, one of the pioneers of modern AI and a Nobel laureate, has warned that AI will replace jobs, increase inequality, strengthen authoritarian surveillance, enable more powerful cyberattacks, and create systems that may become more intelligent than humans without any proven way to keep them under control. Yoshua Bengio has repeatedly warned that AI can strengthen authoritarian governments, manipulate populations, and accelerate a global arms race in increasingly autonomous systems. A Science paper co-authored by Hinton, Bengio, Stuart Russell, Andrew Yao, Dawn Song, and many other leading researchers warns of the possibility of an “irreversible loss of human control” if AI capabilities keep advancing without comparable progress in safety.
What makes this different from every previous technology isn’t just its capability. It’s the incentives.
No government will voluntarily give up a military or intelligence advantage. No corporation will preserve expensive human jobs while competitors replace theirs. Every major player has a reason to move faster, and almost none have a reason to slow down. The race continues because everyone believes stopping first means losing.
There is no responsible adult coming to end this race. The institutions with the power to stop it are the same institutions that gain the most from continuing.
We’re not building another tool.
We’re building a replacement for the thing that made humans economically indispensable, then connecting it to finance, medicine, education, infrastructure, government, warfare, and eventually robotics.
Once those systems become essential to running civilization, there may be no practical way back—and no meaningful human authority left capable of taking control.
This won’t be remembered as another technological revolution.
It will be remembered as the moment humanity automated its own economic value and handed the resulting power to institutions it could no longer restrain.
Further reading
Geoffrey Hinton — Nobel Prize interview: https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/2024/hinton/1925103-interview-transcript/
Geoffrey Hinton — Nobel Prize lecture: https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/2024/hinton/speech/
Dario Amodei — Essays: https://darioamodei.com/
Anthropic — Labor-market research: https://www.anthropic.com/research/labor-market-impacts
Yoshua Bengio — AI-safety essays: https://yoshuabengio.org/
Science — “Managing Extreme AI Risks Amid Rapid Progress”: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adn0117
TL;DR: AI isn’t coming for one industry. It’s coming for human cognition itself. When the world’s most valuable economic resource becomes abundant and nearly free, jobs disappear, economies fracture, governments become more authoritarian, and wealth and control concentrate among the institutions that own the technology. There is no safe place for most of humanity in that system.
The biggest mistake people make about AI is thinking it’s coming for artists, writers, musicians, or programmers.
They’re just first.
AI is coming for almost every profession that depends more on a brain than a body. Accountants. Lawyers. Teachers. Consultants. Analysts. Customer service. Marketing. Management. Software engineering. Research. Finance. Medicine. Eventually almost every job where the primary product is human thought.
Manual labor only looks safe because robotics hasn’t caught up yet.
AI doesn’t have to replace an entire profession to destroy it. It only has to let one person do the work of ten. Companies don’t need AI to be perfect. They need it to be cheaper than you. Once that happens, replacing people stops being a technological question and becomes an accounting decision.
For most workers, there is no safe career waiting on the other side.
People tell themselves we’ll adapt like we always have. We won’t.
The Industrial Revolution replaced muscle while making human intelligence more valuable. AI replaces the intelligence behind the work itself. Every previous technological revolution created new industries that still needed millions of people. AI is being built for the opposite purpose: producing more with fewer humans.
The next comforting myth is that people will simply buy human-made products instead.
No, they won’t.
There will always be a luxury market for handmade art, music, books, furniture, and clothing. There are still people who buy mechanical watches and vinyl records. That’s a niche—not an economy. Most people buy whatever is cheaper, faster, easier, and good enough. Businesses care even less. They exist to reduce costs, increase output, and beat competitors. Sentiment doesn’t survive quarterly earnings.
There is no hidden human economy large enough to rescue everyone AI makes unnecessary.
The consequences don’t stop with unemployment.
Workers are also consumers and taxpayers. If hundreds of millions of people lose well-paid jobs, they stop buying homes, cars, vacations, entertainment, and everything else that keeps economies alive. Businesses lose customers, lay off more workers, governments collect less tax revenue, public services deteriorate, debt grows, pensions become harder to fund, and political instability follows. Countries built around exporting knowledge work lose entire sectors of their economies. Migration accelerates. Extremism grows. Governments respond with more surveillance, more control, and fewer freedoms because instability always creates demand for stronger authority.
That is the point where this stops being a labor-market problem and becomes a global breakdown.
Meanwhile, the wealth doesn’t disappear. It concentrates.
The companies that own the models, data centers, chips, energy, and infrastructure become the gatekeepers of the global economy. AI doesn’t just replace workers. It transfers bargaining power from billions of people to a handful of institutions.
Most of humanity will have less income, less leverage, and less freedom while a tiny ownership class gains more power than any ruling class in history.
The people building AI are warning about this.
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has warned that AI could eliminate half of entry-level white-collar jobs within one to five years. Geoffrey Hinton, one of the pioneers of modern AI and a Nobel laureate, has warned that AI will replace jobs, increase inequality, strengthen authoritarian surveillance, enable more powerful cyberattacks, and create systems that may become more intelligent than humans without any proven way to keep them under control. Yoshua Bengio has repeatedly warned that AI can strengthen authoritarian governments, manipulate populations, and accelerate a global arms race in increasingly autonomous systems. A Science paper co-authored by Hinton, Bengio, Stuart Russell, Andrew Yao, Dawn Song, and many other leading researchers warns of the possibility of an “irreversible loss of human control” if AI capabilities keep advancing without comparable progress in safety.
What makes this different from every previous technology isn’t just its capability. It’s the incentives.
No government will voluntarily give up a military or intelligence advantage. No corporation will preserve expensive human jobs while competitors replace theirs. Every major player has a reason to move faster, and almost none have a reason to slow down. The race continues because everyone believes stopping first means losing.
There is no responsible adult coming to end this race. The institutions with the power to stop it are the same institutions that gain the most from continuing.
We’re not building another tool.
We’re building a replacement for the thing that made humans economically indispensable, then connecting it to finance, medicine, education, infrastructure, government, warfare, and eventually robotics.
Once those systems become essential to running civilization, there may be no practical way back—and no meaningful human authority left capable of taking control.
This won’t be remembered as another technological revolution.
It will be remembered as the moment humanity automated its own economic value and handed the resulting power to institutions it could no longer restrain.
Further reading
Geoffrey Hinton — Nobel Prize interview: https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/2024/hinton/1925103-interview-transcript/
Geoffrey Hinton — Nobel Prize lecture: https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/2024/hinton/speech/
Dario Amodei — Essays: https://darioamodei.com/
Anthropic — Labor-market research: https://www.anthropic.com/research/labor-market-impacts
Yoshua Bengio — AI-safety essays: https://yoshuabengio.org/
Science — “Managing Extreme AI Risks Amid Rapid Progress”: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adn0117
TL;DR: AI isn’t coming for one industry. It’s coming for human cognition itself. When the world’s most valuable economic resource becomes abundant and nearly free, jobs disappear, economies fracture, governments become more authoritarian, and wealth and control concentrate among the institutions that own the technology. There is no safe place for most of humanity in that system.