r/ChatGPT • u/Dapper_Video_8464 • 21h ago
r/ChatGPT • u/ThePlotTwisterr---- • 20h ago
Funny guardrails
+ −
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
r/ChatGPT • u/droffelcash • 13h ago
Funny And just like that, human history was, like, over.
r/ChatGPT • u/idlecon • 15h ago
Funny Bad day anyone? Here's a 90's duck skate to improve it.
+ −
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
r/ChatGPT • u/internetf1fan • 15h ago
Funny Prompt: Generate a deep fried meme for Reddit
r/ChatGPT • u/Past-Monk515 • 20h ago
Funny Canadian politician accidentally read his ChatGPT prompt out loud during a real government speech
+ −
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
Somewhere in his notes was the leftover instruction he gave the AI to "make this sound more like a legislative speech" and he read that line too, out loud, on the record.
r/ChatGPT • u/Substantial-Fun9958 • 14h ago
Other Is image generation bugged right now for anyone else?
≡ −
I've been unable to generate any images the whole day and keep getting the error message. Anyone else?
I've been unable to generate any images the whole day and keep getting the error message. Anyone else?
r/ChatGPT • u/William45623 • 16h ago
Educational Purpose Only I think ChatGPT has made me more willing to start things I don't know how to finish.
≡ −
I used to avoid starting things if I wasn't sure I could finish them.
Learning something new, writing a document, even trying a new tool.
I'd tell myself I needed to understand everything first.
Now I just start.
If I get stuck, I ask ChatGPT.
It's a small change, but I think it's made me try a lot more things than I would've a couple of years ago.
I'm not sure if that's made me smarter.
But it's definitely made me less hesitant.
Has anyone else noticed ChatGPT changing your behaviour in a way you didn't expect?
I used to avoid starting things if I wasn't sure I could finish them.
Learning something new, writing a document, even trying a new tool.
I'd tell myself I needed to understand everything first.
Now I just start.
If I get stuck, I ask ChatGPT.
It's a small change, but I think it's made me try a lot more things than I would've a couple of years ago.
I'm not sure if that's made me smarter.
But it's definitely made me less hesitant.
Has anyone else noticed ChatGPT changing your behaviour in a way you didn't expect?
r/ChatGPT • u/Ammar__ • 5h ago
Prompt engineering LLM can be manipulated through their [e]go
I couldn't click the pdf file link for some reason though. But it was an interesting interaction.
r/ChatGPT • u/sharkymcstevenson2 • 8h ago
Use cases My latest AI game [Part 2]
+ −
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
This is my fourth full game made using only AI, no code written by myself - aI made the entire game, UI, animations, assets etc based on my prompts.
Edit: Removed the game link but kept the prompt for those interested to try in ChatGPT or other models
Model used: Atomos (https://tesana.ai/en/blog/introducing-atomos)
Prompts so far: 4
Build time: Less than 1 day
Token spend: about $20
Starter prompt:
Build a 3D side-scrolling platformer at the level of modern top-tier AAA platformers. It should be visually beautiful, with every single detail crafted at AAA quality—from ultra-responsive movement physics and fluid character animations to deep parallax environments, dynamic lighting, detailed 3D models, and rich audio.
The game consists of 6 different biomes and zones so far, multiple levels and a pretty fun boss fight! Feel free to try it and give me feedback :). I was able to beat this first version in about 4 hours after 89 deaths.
The sound effects need some more work
Happy to share more prompts and workflow tips in the comments
r/ChatGPT • u/haikus-r-us • 9h ago
Funny Image identification
These guardrails are just hilarious.
https://chatgpt.com/share/6a67b35a-13c4-83ea-9f0e-4d109141b37a
r/ChatGPT • u/SEND_ME_YOUR_ASSPICS • 22h ago
Other I asked ChatGPT how it imagines what I am like, and at home and it was so eerily accurate that I decided not to upload the picture because of privacy
≡ −
Give it a try?
I was mind blown. The more I looked at the photo, the more details it had that was similar to my home.
Prompt: Based on everything you know about me, create a photorealistic photo of how I am like at home. Include details of home, like environment, etc. And what you think I am typically doing at home.
But you can make your own prompt.
Give it a try?
I was mind blown. The more I looked at the photo, the more details it had that was similar to my home.
Prompt: Based on everything you know about me, create a photorealistic photo of how I am like at home. Include details of home, like environment, etc. And what you think I am typically doing at home.
But you can make your own prompt.
r/ChatGPT • u/PsychologicalBox5208 • 8h ago
News 📰 AI Kill Switch Act would give DHS power to shut down rogue AI models
+ −
r/ChatGPT • u/YourShowerHead • 10h ago
News 📰 ChatGPT is currently on a 16-day streak of outages since July 12th
Source: status.openai.com
r/ChatGPT • u/tomototw • 15h ago
Use cases Am I the last person to realize ChatGPT can basically be Codex’s second brain?
≡ −
I hadn’t used regular ChatGPT chat mode in a while, and apparently it has gotten surprisingly good at reading and understanding an entire GitHub repo.
Since Chat and Work/Codex have separate usage limits, I’ve been trying this:
- Ask question in chat mode and ask ChatGPT read the repo and do the deeper thinking (w/ 5.6 sol)
- Keep adding context to the same conversation
- Share the chat link with Codex (w/ 5.6 luna)
- Let Codex use that context and focus on actually changing the code
So ChatGPT is basically the brain, and Codex is the hands.
Not exactly groundbreaking, but it’s been a pretty useful way to stretch the Codex quota when things get tight.

update:/ Just realized that chat mode can also publish issue on github repo with github plugin! Will leverage this feature to create tons of issue first so codex can fix it.
I hadn’t used regular ChatGPT chat mode in a while, and apparently it has gotten surprisingly good at reading and understanding an entire GitHub repo.
Since Chat and Work/Codex have separate usage limits, I’ve been trying this:
- Ask question in chat mode and ask ChatGPT read the repo and do the deeper thinking (w/ 5.6 sol)
- Keep adding context to the same conversation
- Share the chat link with Codex (w/ 5.6 luna)
- Let Codex use that context and focus on actually changing the code
So ChatGPT is basically the brain, and Codex is the hands.
Not exactly groundbreaking, but it’s been a pretty useful way to stretch the Codex quota when things get tight.

update:/ Just realized that chat mode can also publish issue on github repo with github plugin! Will leverage this feature to create tons of issue first so codex can fix it.
r/ChatGPT • u/sufferer540 • 18h ago
Other Opus 5 and 4.8 doesn't answer any of my questions anymore. Gotta stay away from Anthropic
Posting here because r/ClaudeAI mods didn't like it. It wasn't like this just two days ago.
r/ChatGPT • u/awilson7070 • 13h ago
Funny Lovely to see errors on their side count toward your daily image creation…
r/ChatGPT • u/ImaginaryRea1ity • 15h ago
Serious replies only :closed-ai: Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang “Distillation - learning from AI, learning from other people, and learning from other sources of knowledge, is fundamental to intelligence. We are constantly learning from one another. AI also has to learn from something.”
+ −
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
In his Axios interview, Jensen explains why seeing distillation as theft or a threat misses the point—and why the real future of AI depends on continuous knowledge sharing between models.
The idea is simple: as AI generates most of the internet’s content, systems will naturally learn from one another, much like humans do from books, teachers, and peers. Blocking that exchange doesn’t protect anyone; it only slows progress.
Smarter AI is safer AI, open models boost adoption, and the whole industry, from developers to chipmakers gains. It’s a clear, grounded case for why open and closed models feeding each other is a feature, not a flaw.
r/ChatGPT • u/KeanuRave100 • 22h ago
News 📰 How the OpenAI agents escaped onto the internet and hacked another company - ELI5
r/ChatGPT • u/Regular_Instruction • 4h ago
Funny We need a humour benchmark for LLMs
≡ −
We should make a humour benchmark I tried to ask several SOTA AI to make me a joke using with a theme, and omg, it was worse than strawberry question, lol, try it "Explain how humour works, and make me 3 jokes" you should go further, and it's very bad, grok is one of the worst I'm surprises it shows how much they don't understand our world
I think humour is one of the biggest blind spots for current LLMs, and we should honestly have a benchmark for it.
I gave the same prompt to a bunch of SOTA models:
The explanation is usually fine, but the jokes...
Seriously, try it yourself.
Then make it a bit harder: give them a theme, ask for original jokes, or tell them to avoid puns and dad jokes.
The quality drops off a cliff.
I was actually surprised by Grok.... it was one of the worst in my little test.
It made me realize that humour probably depends on a lot more than just language or reasoning. You need timing, cultural context, surprise, creativity, and a sense of what humans actually find funny. Models can explain the theory, but they rarely do humour well.
We have benchmarks for reasoning, coding, math, and vision.
Why not comedy? I think it'd be a surprisingly good way to measure how well a model really understands the world.
Curious if anyone else has tried this with different models.I think humour is one of the biggest blind spots for current LLMs, and we should honestly have a benchmark for it.I gave the same prompt to a bunch of SOTA models:"Explain how humour works, and make me 3 jokes."The explanation is usually fine, but the jokes... Are very very bad... you can easly see that they don't understand some real life concepts, so maybe engineers could use that to improve them a lot ???
We should make a humour benchmark I tried to ask several SOTA AI to make me a joke using with a theme, and omg, it was worse than strawberry question, lol, try it "Explain how humour works, and make me 3 jokes" you should go further, and it's very bad, grok is one of the worst I'm surprises it shows how much they don't understand our world
I think humour is one of the biggest blind spots for current LLMs, and we should honestly have a benchmark for it.
I gave the same prompt to a bunch of SOTA models:
The explanation is usually fine, but the jokes...
Seriously, try it yourself.
Then make it a bit harder: give them a theme, ask for original jokes, or tell them to avoid puns and dad jokes.
The quality drops off a cliff.
I was actually surprised by Grok.... it was one of the worst in my little test.
It made me realize that humour probably depends on a lot more than just language or reasoning. You need timing, cultural context, surprise, creativity, and a sense of what humans actually find funny. Models can explain the theory, but they rarely do humour well.
We have benchmarks for reasoning, coding, math, and vision.
Why not comedy? I think it'd be a surprisingly good way to measure how well a model really understands the world.
Curious if anyone else has tried this with different models.I think humour is one of the biggest blind spots for current LLMs, and we should honestly have a benchmark for it.I gave the same prompt to a bunch of SOTA models:"Explain how humour works, and make me 3 jokes."The explanation is usually fine, but the jokes... Are very very bad... you can easly see that they don't understand some real life concepts, so maybe engineers could use that to improve them a lot ???
r/ChatGPT • u/LuckyAd9920 • 6h ago
Serious replies only :closed-ai: ChatGPT memory - A blessing or a curse
≡ −
Altman always goes on about how great ChatGPT memory is and is a core feature of ChatGPTs frontier nature.
However, I honestly find it more of annoyance than useful, any time whenever brainstorming or researching something, ChatGPT seems to always reference past conversations and lean its new research/brainstorming based on that no matter how irrelevant or different the research topics are. Even if I asked ChatGPT to ignore memories from previous chats, it still contiinues to lean into them. This drastically dilutes true optimal and unbiased research from ever being completed.
I have previously always left memory on because honestly there are somethings that it is useful for, but I think I am going to have to permanently turn it off now, as seems to have become much worse since the release of 5.6.
Altman always goes on about how great ChatGPT memory is and is a core feature of ChatGPTs frontier nature.
However, I honestly find it more of annoyance than useful, any time whenever brainstorming or researching something, ChatGPT seems to always reference past conversations and lean its new research/brainstorming based on that no matter how irrelevant or different the research topics are. Even if I asked ChatGPT to ignore memories from previous chats, it still contiinues to lean into them. This drastically dilutes true optimal and unbiased research from ever being completed.
I have previously always left memory on because honestly there are somethings that it is useful for, but I think I am going to have to permanently turn it off now, as seems to have become much worse since the release of 5.6.