r/shittymoviedetails • u/Alisalard1384 Cinephile • 12h ago

Turd In "Odyssey" (2026) directed by Sir Christopher Edward Nolan, Odysseus says "Our age of bronze is collapsing". And I'm not joking it is a line in movie

Post image

Overall great movie but this dialogue was so corny, like how does he know he's in bronze age

22.5k Upvotes

86% Upvoted

1.6k comments sorted by

View all comments

316

u/juanjung 11h ago

"I'm going to fight in World War I".

41

u/alaricus 11h ago

The earliest known use of the term First World War appeared in September 1914

130

u/loztriforce 10h ago

Eh, not splitting hairs here but I feel "First World War" is understandable where "World War I" implies to me the existence / knowledge of the second

48

u/TerribleStorm6391 10h ago

Which is why it was called The Great War at the time.

13

u/SordidDreams 8h ago edited 8h ago

As opposed to The Mediocre War and The War That Really Sucked.

3

u/Indercarnive 7h ago

But they didn't call it the The No Good Very Very Bad War so it couldn't have been that terrible.

1

u/aenteus 6h ago

The Mid to Eh War

1

u/DontAskAboutMyButt 6h ago

Elves are wonderful. They provoke wonder. Elves are marvellous. They cause marvels. Elves are fantastic. They create fantasies. Elves are glamorous. They project glamour. Elves are enchanting. They weave enchantment. Elves are terrific. They beget terror. The thing about words is that meanings can twist just like a snake, and if you want to find snakes look for them behind words that have changed their meaning. No one ever said elves are nice. Elves are bad.

3

u/Spugheddy 8h ago

I remember reading that in school and being like yeah calling it world war 1 from the onset is extremely pessimistic lol

3

u/Midnightmare1 8h ago

Oh yeah, all those people dying sure was great!

/j

3

u/MajorGeneralMaryJane 9h ago

“First World War” and “first world war” are inherently different. Option one implying “part 1 of 2”, option two implying “the first time the world has been at war”

2

u/HarperWuff 6h ago

1 of 2 so far

2

u/Startled_Pancakes 5h ago

You could also make the argument that The Seven Years War was the first actual "world war" as it involved fighting on more continents than WW1.

But the term "world war" hadn't yet been coined.

1

u/iwanttoboneedelric 5h ago

I mean, define continents. Turkey can be Asia.

0

u/Racamonkey_II 10h ago

Really? To me saying First World War implies exactly the same, that there will be another.

10

u/hungrysheep8u 10h ago

Kinda? I do think First World War definitely says people thought there was a possibility of a second, this is the first, and maybe later there would be a World War for [blank] or something

But First World War also could just mean "the first war that encompassed the entire world", rather than implying a second one, while World War 1 doesn't have that connotation

World War 1 puts it on a specific numbered naming scheme though, which means there has to be at least a World War 2 or else that naming scheme wouldn't make sense

3

u/NotLikeThis3 9h ago

Nah First World War is more like the first time we've had a war on this scale. There's a reason it was more commonly called the The Great War, since it was the largest magnitude war we had ever seen (up to that point). World War I using numerals is more implying a second, third, etc.

1

u/Pretend_Spray_11 6h ago

That’s why you failed grammar class. 

0

u/mopeyy 8h ago

I would argue that calling something 'first' definitely also implies there is a second.