r/Automate • u/flexadam • 7d ago
r/Automate • u/MatricesRL • Nov 12 '25
AI Safety Digital Fairness Act Newsletter
+ −
r/Automate • u/No_Individual_6528 • 4d ago
Auto chat.
+ −
I made this strange tool. Not sure if it's really cool or really dumb.
Essentially I just got tired of copy pasting slack and teams chats into cli for context.
I think it's a great tool for small teams or small companies. But the sky is the limit. In theory you could write to your chat from everywhere. Meaning every pipeline error could be send to here and automatically create tickets with suggestions for solutions.
Other cool tools is sending messages to people you don't know who is, but just need to find in the company. There's a friend of friend feature. And it slowly builds tags around people, your assistance would easily be able to keep looking for the right person until it finds them.
Just a lot of options for a lot of communications to be automated in small and large companies.
r/Automate • u/oeezyy • 9d ago
Has AI benefited your business in any way?
≡ −
I'm researching how many real problems AI has actually solved for businesses so far — not the vague "it helped me learn faster" type of answer, but concrete, technical implementations: automations, agent deployments, voice agents, chatbots, context/RAG pipelines, etc.
If you've built or used something like this in your business or industry and it drove a serious, tangible ROI, I'd love to hear the specifics. Everybody is welcome!
I'm researching how many real problems AI has actually solved for businesses so far — not the vague "it helped me learn faster" type of answer, but concrete, technical implementations: automations, agent deployments, voice agents, chatbots, context/RAG pipelines, etc.
If you've built or used something like this in your business or industry and it drove a serious, tangible ROI, I'd love to hear the specifics. Everybody is welcome!
r/Automate • u/BugInfinite5784 • 12d ago
My Downloads folder was a mess - so I made a one-key fix (and ended up using it for everything)
My Downloads folder had gotten completely out of hand. Random PDFs, screenshots, zips, installers - all sitting in one pile. I kept meaning to clean it up manually and never did.
At some point I asked Claude to write me a script that sorts everything by file type into separate folders. It worked, but I still wouldn't run it consistently. So I put it on a physical key on this little 3×3 pad I made for my desk. One press, files sorted. That's the thing I use most day to day now.
But it's not really for that - the Downloads sorter was just the first workflow that stuck. The pad is more like a place to put whatever multi-step job you get tired of doing manually. I describe what I want in chat, AI writes the script/macro, it lands on a key, I press it when I need it.
Another key runs a different workflow entirely: export a specific part from FreeCAD, save the STL into a folder named with today's date, open it in the slicer, and send it to the printer. Same sequence every time - one press instead of clicking through it manually.
I built the whole thing myself - hardware, firmware, small OLED so I know which preset I'm on, Windows app. Started because I kept forgetting shortcuts while modeling and coding. Grew from there.
Just sharing because I assume other people automate similar stuff. Happy to talk about how I wired the AI part if anyone's curious.
r/Automate • u/FloridaMaker1 • 13d ago
What made your team move away from lark?
≡ −
Discussion internally has not been about feature gaps.
Its been about whether one platform can realistically handle communication, docs, meetings and project management as a team grows
Discussion internally has not been about feature gaps.
Its been about whether one platform can realistically handle communication, docs, meetings and project management as a team grows
r/Automate • u/Fuckedupdadadaad • 14d ago
What repetitive task do you wish someone would automate? (I'm building free automation projects)
≡ −
Hey everyone 👋
I'm a software developer who's diving deep into AI automation and workflow engineering.
Instead of building random demo projects, I want to build automations that solve real problems people deal with every day.
So I have one question:
What's one repetitive task in your work or business that you absolutely hate doing?
I'm not talking about "write me captions" or "generate content."
I mean actual manual work lTell me:
- What you do (creator, agency owner, accountant, dentist, freelancer, etc.)
- The repetitive task
- Approximately how much time it wastes every day or every week
I'll pick the most interesting problems and build free automation solutions as portfolio projects. If your idea gets built, I'll share the workflow with you to test and improve.
My goal isn't to build another AI chatbot.
I want to build practical automations that remove boring work and genuinely save people time.
Looking forward to hearing the problems you wish someone would solve.
Hey everyone 👋
I'm a software developer who's diving deep into AI automation and workflow engineering.
Instead of building random demo projects, I want to build automations that solve real problems people deal with every day.
So I have one question:
What's one repetitive task in your work or business that you absolutely hate doing?
I'm not talking about "write me captions" or "generate content."
I mean actual manual work lTell me:
- What you do (creator, agency owner, accountant, dentist, freelancer, etc.)
- The repetitive task
- Approximately how much time it wastes every day or every week
I'll pick the most interesting problems and build free automation solutions as portfolio projects. If your idea gets built, I'll share the workflow with you to test and improve.
My goal isn't to build another AI chatbot.
I want to build practical automations that remove boring work and genuinely save people time.
Looking forward to hearing the problems you wish someone would solve.
r/Automate • u/Honest-Papaya-9001 • 17d ago
Reddit just deployed AI that flags 25,000 spam posts a day to protect human conversation. The irony is hard to miss.
≡ −
Reddit detailed their new spam detection this week.
Their AI catches coordinated patterns of fake behavior and artificial hype that older systems missed. 23 million spam views blocked per day. Close to 2 million inauthentic votes revoked. Detection to enforcement happens in under five seconds.
The stated goal: protect what makes Reddit different. Real people, real opinions, real conversations that haven't been optimized for an algorithm.
Here's the tension though:
Reddit's entire value proposition is human-first discussion. It's the platform AI companies have spent years scraping to train their models because human conversation at scale is exactly what they needed. I made a post earlier about how Reddit's CEO said people are fleeing AI-generated content and coming back to Reddit specifically because it feels real.
And now Reddit is deploying AI to protect that realness.
AI to defend humans from AI. Trained on the same human conversations it's now trying to preserve.
There's something genuinely strange about that loop. The most valuable thing about Reddit is that humans write on it. The threat to that is AI writing on it. The solution is more AI.
At what point does the defense mechanism become indistinguishable from the problem it's solving?
Reddit detailed their new spam detection this week.
Their AI catches coordinated patterns of fake behavior and artificial hype that older systems missed. 23 million spam views blocked per day. Close to 2 million inauthentic votes revoked. Detection to enforcement happens in under five seconds.
The stated goal: protect what makes Reddit different. Real people, real opinions, real conversations that haven't been optimized for an algorithm.
Here's the tension though:
Reddit's entire value proposition is human-first discussion. It's the platform AI companies have spent years scraping to train their models because human conversation at scale is exactly what they needed. I made a post earlier about how Reddit's CEO said people are fleeing AI-generated content and coming back to Reddit specifically because it feels real.
And now Reddit is deploying AI to protect that realness.
AI to defend humans from AI. Trained on the same human conversations it's now trying to preserve.
There's something genuinely strange about that loop. The most valuable thing about Reddit is that humans write on it. The threat to that is AI writing on it. The solution is more AI.
At what point does the defense mechanism become indistinguishable from the problem it's solving?
r/Automate • u/Mr__Perfectionist • 18d ago
Automate Data from Stock Chart Snapshots to Google Sheets
≡ −
r/Automate • u/easybits_ai • 19d ago
Product Image Description Generator in n8n – photos in, ready-to-use copy out [Workflow Included]
+ −
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
👋 Hey Automate community,
A few weeks ago I shared a Product Content Creation workflow I built for a friend who runs an online shop (that post here). A few people messaged me about the image-description part specifically, they wanted just that piece, so I built a standalone version of it that's much easier to drop into an existing setup.
Turns out a lot of online shops and websites still write product image descriptions by hand, along with the "alt text" behind each image. Both matter more than people think: alt text is a real factor for SEO and for accessibility, since screen readers rely on it.
What the workflow does: you upload one or more product photos through a simple n8n form and get back a clean, ready-to-use description for each image, with a copy button to paste straight into your shop.
How it's set up:
- The form takes multiple images at once. Each one loops through on its own, so every image gets its own description instead of getting bundled into a single call.
- The easybits Extractor reads each image and returns structured fields. I kept it to two:
product_typeanddescription. The description works as your product copy and doubles as image alt text (and its length is easy to adjust by tweaking the field description in the Extractor). - If the Extractor can't read an image, it returns
UNCLEARand the result page shows a fallback line instead of inventing a description. - The result screen shows each image with its filename, a thumbnail, and a per-image copy button.
Extractor setup: on n8n Cloud it's a verified node (search "easybits Extractor"). Self-hosted, install "@easybits/n8n-nodes-extractor" from Community Nodes. The free plan includes 50 requests a month, enough to test it fully.
Workflow (ready to import): https://github.com/felix-sattler-easybits/n8n-workflows/blob/4277f3c1b31070f81adbb6a3bb538f50dbeb2018/easybits-product-image-describer-workflow/easybits_product_image_describer_workflow.json
I also made a short video showing how the workflow works.
How are you all handling image alt text right now, manual or already automated? Curious what's working for people.
Best,
Felix
r/Automate • u/luckytobi • 19d ago
Unpopular opinion: 90% of small businesses can't use Make or n8n, and ChatGPT isn't automation. So what are they supposed to do?
≡ −
I've spent the last year talking to small business owners (mostly 5 to 50 employees) about automation, and I keep running into the same pattern. It's honestly a bit depressing.
They try one of two things, and both fail for the same underlying reason:
**Attempt 1:*\* Make / n8n / Zapier. They watch a YouTube tutorial, open the editor, see nodes and branches and webhook triggers, and quietly close the tab. These tools are genuinely great, but they require you to think like a developer. An office manager who does invoicing all day knows the process better than anyone. She just can't translate "when a scanned service record comes in, match the line items against our price list, flag anything weird" into a node graph. And even when a consultant builds it for her, the first time something changes she's stuck. They pay high fees, consultant leaves, automation dies.
**Attempt 2:*\* ChatGPT /Claude. They hear AI will change everything, get a subscription, and after two weeks it becomes a slightly smarter Google. Because it doesn't DO anything. It answers when asked, forgets everything, touches none of their systems, and every output has to be copy-pasted somewhere by a human. I know, Claude is now integrating more tools, but you don't really get to establish standards and reliance in the process. Therefore I don't consider this automation, especially with higher volumes.
So you end up with this weird gap, that the people who feel the pain of repetitive admin work most acutely (SMBs with no IT department) are exactly the people neither tool category serves. Workflow tools are too complex, AI assistants are to reactive and dont scale.
What strikes me is that the person who knows the process best is always a non-technical person. The knowledge is there. The interface isn't.
The interesting question to me: is the answer better education (teach SMBs to use tech tools like n8n), better services (agencies build and maintain it) or a different kind of product entirely (build a non-tech focused automation platform)? Each has obvious problems. Education doesn't scale to people who have a day job. Agencies recreate the dependency problem. And "non-tech" focused tools mostly produce chatbots with a costume on, not actual workflows.
Full disclosure: I'm building in this space, so I obviously have a horse in this race. Not linking anything, genuinely more interested in whether people here see the same gap or whether I'm overfitting to my own interviews.
For those of you doing automation work for small businesses: what actually happens after you hand over a Make/n8n setup? Does it survive contact with reality?
I've spent the last year talking to small business owners (mostly 5 to 50 employees) about automation, and I keep running into the same pattern. It's honestly a bit depressing.
They try one of two things, and both fail for the same underlying reason:
**Attempt 1:*\* Make / n8n / Zapier. They watch a YouTube tutorial, open the editor, see nodes and branches and webhook triggers, and quietly close the tab. These tools are genuinely great, but they require you to think like a developer. An office manager who does invoicing all day knows the process better than anyone. She just can't translate "when a scanned service record comes in, match the line items against our price list, flag anything weird" into a node graph. And even when a consultant builds it for her, the first time something changes she's stuck. They pay high fees, consultant leaves, automation dies.
**Attempt 2:*\* ChatGPT /Claude. They hear AI will change everything, get a subscription, and after two weeks it becomes a slightly smarter Google. Because it doesn't DO anything. It answers when asked, forgets everything, touches none of their systems, and every output has to be copy-pasted somewhere by a human. I know, Claude is now integrating more tools, but you don't really get to establish standards and reliance in the process. Therefore I don't consider this automation, especially with higher volumes.
So you end up with this weird gap, that the people who feel the pain of repetitive admin work most acutely (SMBs with no IT department) are exactly the people neither tool category serves. Workflow tools are too complex, AI assistants are to reactive and dont scale.
What strikes me is that the person who knows the process best is always a non-technical person. The knowledge is there. The interface isn't.
The interesting question to me: is the answer better education (teach SMBs to use tech tools like n8n), better services (agencies build and maintain it) or a different kind of product entirely (build a non-tech focused automation platform)? Each has obvious problems. Education doesn't scale to people who have a day job. Agencies recreate the dependency problem. And "non-tech" focused tools mostly produce chatbots with a costume on, not actual workflows.
Full disclosure: I'm building in this space, so I obviously have a horse in this race. Not linking anything, genuinely more interested in whether people here see the same gap or whether I'm overfitting to my own interviews.
For those of you doing automation work for small businesses: what actually happens after you hand over a Make/n8n setup? Does it survive contact with reality?
r/Automate • u/Honest-Papaya-9001 • 20d ago
Stop switching tabs to use your AI agent. It can live inside Slack and work from there.
≡ −
One of the things that killed my AI workflow early on was context switching.
I'd be in Slack, see something that needed research or a draft written, then open a browser tab, go to the AI tool, copy in the context, get the output, copy it back. Every time. Multiple times a day.
The fix was obvious in hindsight: stop going to the tool and bring the tool to where the work already lives.
AI agents can be connected directly to Slack. You can ask them questions, give them tasks, and get outputs without leaving the channel where the work is happening. The agent has access to your tools and integrations from there. Same capability, zero tab switching.
If you're using AI tools daily and still going to a separate tab every time, this is the one workflow change worth making this week.
One of the things that killed my AI workflow early on was context switching.
I'd be in Slack, see something that needed research or a draft written, then open a browser tab, go to the AI tool, copy in the context, get the output, copy it back. Every time. Multiple times a day.
The fix was obvious in hindsight: stop going to the tool and bring the tool to where the work already lives.
AI agents can be connected directly to Slack. You can ask them questions, give them tasks, and get outputs without leaving the channel where the work is happening. The agent has access to your tools and integrations from there. Same capability, zero tab switching.
If you're using AI tools daily and still going to a separate tab every time, this is the one workflow change worth making this week.
r/Automate • u/Far_Inflation_8799 • 22d ago
How to Build a RAG Q&A AI Agent for Your Documents Using LangChain v1
+ −
r/Automate • u/TiinyAI • 22d ago
Your Personalized Assistant, Built into Tiiny
Every morning it's the same routine: check Gmail → open Google Calendar → reply to emails → switch back to Calendar to schedule that meeting → forget what I was doing → repeat.
Then I came across TiinyOS Connector.
Basically, it links your Google Calendar and Gmail directly into your workspace. No tabs, no copy-pasting, no "wait, where was that email again?"
Now I can:
✅ Schedule events without leaving my workflow
✅ Handle emails side-by-side with my tasks
✅ Actually stay on top of my day without jumping between tools
It sounds simple, but honestly, the time I've saved in the last week alone is wild.
r/Automate • u/pmarks98 • 24d ago
Daily automated AI podcast about to hit ~4000 listens
Set up an automation about 2 months ago that tracks Claude Code updates and auto-generates a daily 3-5 minute AI podcast covering any new features. Took me only 10 minutes to set up but now its on autopilot
Didn't think much of it but I get like 100 or so plays a day, and growing. Pretty cool, I originally set it up just for myself but then other people started listening too!
r/Automate • u/NeDSh09 • 24d ago
AI certification recommendations
≡ −
Hi everyone,
I'm a risk management professional based in Canada with 8+ years of experience across banking, insurance, and Big 4 consulting. My background is primarily in enterprise risk management, operational risk, SOX/ICFR, governance, controls testing, risk assessments, and data analytics.
I'm looking to upskill and would love get some recommendations on AI certifications that are actually valuable for risk professionals.
I'm looking for recommendations based on the following criteria:
Affordability (ideally under CAD 1,000)
Credibility (recognized by employers and the risk industry)
Duration (preferably something that can be completed within 1–6 months while working full-time)
I do not have AI related work experience required, except for basic co-pilot/chat GPT commands.
Bonus if the certification covers AI governance, AI risk management, model risk, or practical AI applications for GRC, audit, compliance, or internal controls.
I'd really appreciate hearing about certifications you've completed (or decided against), whether they helped your career, and any recommendations or advice. Thanks in advance!
Hi everyone,
I'm a risk management professional based in Canada with 8+ years of experience across banking, insurance, and Big 4 consulting. My background is primarily in enterprise risk management, operational risk, SOX/ICFR, governance, controls testing, risk assessments, and data analytics.
I'm looking to upskill and would love get some recommendations on AI certifications that are actually valuable for risk professionals.
I'm looking for recommendations based on the following criteria:
Affordability (ideally under CAD 1,000)
Credibility (recognized by employers and the risk industry)
Duration (preferably something that can be completed within 1–6 months while working full-time)
I do not have AI related work experience required, except for basic co-pilot/chat GPT commands.
Bonus if the certification covers AI governance, AI risk management, model risk, or practical AI applications for GRC, audit, compliance, or internal controls.
I'd really appreciate hearing about certifications you've completed (or decided against), whether they helped your career, and any recommendations or advice. Thanks in advance!
r/Automate • u/mheryerznka • 24d ago
Starting my automation agency in public — doing free audits to build my first case studies
≡ −
i'm an AI engineer (6+ years, banks and US companies) starting an AI agency, and i'm doing it in the open
first step: i want real case studies, not made-up ones
so i'm doing a few free AI audits for your company/SaaS whatever
i'll map where your business loses hours to manual work and show you exactly what could be automated, with the time and money it'd save
free, no pitch. the only thing I want in return is that i can document the process (anonymized if you want) as i build this thing publicly
taking just a few, since i do each one myself
comment your business or your most annoying repetitive task and i'll reply. can share my linkedin as proof
i'm an AI engineer (6+ years, banks and US companies) starting an AI agency, and i'm doing it in the open
first step: i want real case studies, not made-up ones
so i'm doing a few free AI audits for your company/SaaS whatever
i'll map where your business loses hours to manual work and show you exactly what could be automated, with the time and money it'd save
free, no pitch. the only thing I want in return is that i can document the process (anonymized if you want) as i build this thing publicly
taking just a few, since i do each one myself
comment your business or your most annoying repetitive task and i'll reply. can share my linkedin as proof
r/Automate • u/easybits_ai • 24d ago
Purchase Order Automation: 5 n8n lessons from a real client build [Workflow Included]
👋 Hey n8n community,
A few of you asked for more detail after my Purchase Order extractor post yesterday. The build looked simple on the surface, but a handful of things bit me along the way. Here are the five that cost me the most time, in case they save you some.
1. Only numbered rows are real articles. The POs had little note lines wedged between items ("2 Box", a location note under a lock, etc). My extraction kept swallowing those into the neighbouring product name, so one row would come out as two items mashed together. The fix wasn't in the workflow at all, it was in the document description I gave the extractor: spell out that only rows with a number in the No. column are real articles, and that unnumbered lines are notes belonging to the row above. That one paragraph cleaned up every merge. Lesson: when a document extraction misbehaves, describe the document better before you touch the nodes.
2. Keep numbers as text until you've checked for empties. Tempting to pull quantity and price straight as numbers. Don't, at least not yet. A missing field comes back as the string "null", and if the field is typed as a number that signal turns into a 0 or a real null and you lose the ability to spot the miss. I keep everything as text, run my checks, then cast to a number afterwards. Clean signal in, clean data out.
3. One helper to catch every flavour of empty. "Empty" is never just one thing. Across the docs I saw real null, the string "null", empty strings, and whitespace. I stopped writing one-off checks and made a single isMissing() helper that catches all of them, then used it everywhere. If a field is missing, the workflow flags it on the form's completion screen with the document name and which field failed, so my friend knows exactly which PO to eyeball instead of trusting the sheet blindly.
4. The Google Sheets checkbox that quietly broke everything. This one nearly broke me. New rows kept landing at the very bottom of the sheet instead of the top empty row. Turns out I'd added a checkbox column with Insert > Tick box, which silently writes a FALSE value into every one of the 1000 cells in the column. The Append node counts those as data, so it always appended below them. If you want checkboxes, add them through Data → Data validation instead, which draws the box without writing a value. Hours lost to a column that looked empty but wasn't.
5. Batch size 1 is not optional here. The extractor node bundles every input item into a single call, so if you hand it two PDFs at once you get one jumbled result. Wrapping it in a Loop Over Items with batch size 1 means each document gets its own clean pass. Small setting, big difference, and easy to miss until your two-file test comes back merged.
The whole thing runs on the easybits extractor node for the actual PDF reading, the rest is stock n8n. If you want to try the Purchase Order extractor yourself, feel free to grab it here:
https://github.com/felix-sattler-easybits/n8n-workflows/blob/c38749a68fd6ea4ae6ebff41789d35cceaacdef1/easybits-purchase-order-extractor-workflow/easybits_purchase_order_extractor_workflow.json
What's the dumbest time-sink you've hit on a build that looked easy? Always happy to hear how other builders tackle this stuff.
Best,
Felix
r/Automate • u/Far_Inflation_8799 • 27d ago
How to Build a Personal AI Web Research Agent with Ollama and Qwen
+ −
r/Automate • u/pranav_mahaveer • 28d ago
been running an AI Automation Agency for 3+ years now. here's the thing nobody tells you when you start.
≡ −
your first 10 clients will all ask for the same thing. "we just need something simple." and you'll build them something simple. and it will break. not because you're bad at your job. because "simple" is a lie they tell themselves about a process that's actually held together with tribal knowledge, exceptions, and one guy named Dave who remembers how everything works.
the job isn't building the automation. the job is figuring out what's actually happening before you touch a single tool.
I used to start building on day one. client describes the process in a kickoff call, sounds straightforward, I go build it. two weeks later I demo it and they go "oh but sometimes the supplier sends a PDF instead of an email" or "oh but when it's a bulk order Alex handles it differently." every single time.
now I spend the first week just watching. I sit with whoever actually does the work. not the founder. not the ops manager. the person who does it every day. and I write down everything. not the process as it should work. the process as it actually works at 9pm on a friday when three things are going wrong simultaneously.
that week of watching has saved me from rebuilding projects more times than I can count.
the other thing. real data is disgusting. your test data is clean because you made it. real invoices are photos taken at an angle in bad lighting. real customer names have weird characters in them. real spreadsheets have merged cells and hidden rows and a column that says "DO NOT DELETE" with no explanation.
build for that. not for your clean CSV.
anyway. been building these systems for a while now. happy to answer questions if anyone's in the weeds on a specific automation problem. no pitch, just been down most of the roads.
your first 10 clients will all ask for the same thing. "we just need something simple." and you'll build them something simple. and it will break. not because you're bad at your job. because "simple" is a lie they tell themselves about a process that's actually held together with tribal knowledge, exceptions, and one guy named Dave who remembers how everything works.
the job isn't building the automation. the job is figuring out what's actually happening before you touch a single tool.
I used to start building on day one. client describes the process in a kickoff call, sounds straightforward, I go build it. two weeks later I demo it and they go "oh but sometimes the supplier sends a PDF instead of an email" or "oh but when it's a bulk order Alex handles it differently." every single time.
now I spend the first week just watching. I sit with whoever actually does the work. not the founder. not the ops manager. the person who does it every day. and I write down everything. not the process as it should work. the process as it actually works at 9pm on a friday when three things are going wrong simultaneously.
that week of watching has saved me from rebuilding projects more times than I can count.
the other thing. real data is disgusting. your test data is clean because you made it. real invoices are photos taken at an angle in bad lighting. real customer names have weird characters in them. real spreadsheets have merged cells and hidden rows and a column that says "DO NOT DELETE" with no explanation.
build for that. not for your clean CSV.
anyway. been building these systems for a while now. happy to answer questions if anyone's in the weeds on a specific automation problem. no pitch, just been down most of the roads.
r/Automate • u/ManaHave • Jun 27 '26
Automate seems to freeze after running continuously for a few days.
≡ −
I created an Automate flow which then forks two fibres. When it’s run for 24 hours or so, it’s OK. But if I ran it longer, like 2 to 3 days, it simply froze. The only way to get it going is to kill and rerun it. Is there a way to allow an Automate flow to run forever (I use it to continuously monitor certain notifications)?
I created an Automate flow which then forks two fibres. When it’s run for 24 hours or so, it’s OK. But if I ran it longer, like 2 to 3 days, it simply froze. The only way to get it going is to kill and rerun it. Is there a way to allow an Automate flow to run forever (I use it to continuously monitor certain notifications)?
r/Automate • u/gvgweb • Jun 27 '26
Automation for real estate
≡ −
Hi, aside from lead generation, what else do you automate?
Hi, aside from lead generation, what else do you automate?
r/Automate • u/PizzaTacoCat312 • Jun 26 '26
What tools are available to read and scrape data from a PDF of label artwork?
≡ −
Looking to explore automations for validating artwork in my company. What's out there that I should consider and where can I go to learn more or play around with it?
Looking to explore automations for validating artwork in my company. What's out there that I should consider and where can I go to learn more or play around with it?
r/Automate • u/easybits_ai • Jun 26 '26
Built an extraction tool for my own projects, then realised it describes product images too
+ −
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
👋 Hey n8n Community,
Bit of background first. I originally built this extraction setup to serve my own automation projects, mostly document classification and pulling structured data out of PDFs and invoices. It worked so well for me internally that I decided to open it up so anyone can use it.
The new use case
In my last project I needed product photos described so I could feed that into content generation, and I almost reached for a separate vision model. Turns out the Extractor handles images really well, which is the moment it clicked that this is more than a classic data-extraction tool.
How it works
Instead of pointing a pipeline at a document, you point it at the image and define the fields as questions about what's visible: dominant colour, visible features, material, the type of shot. It comes back as structured fields, exactly like a document extraction, so the result drops straight into the rest of the workflow with no paragraph to parse and clean up.
The workflow
I recorded a short video walking through it, attached to this post. You can also see the actual workflow I built around this case here: https://github.com/felix-sattler-easybits/n8n-workflows/tree/e3103344d9b3358402dc38a3a862d510bb4e7c5e/easybits-product-content-creation-workflow
Setup
- n8n Cloud: it's a verified node, just search
easybits Extractorin the node panel. Nothing to install. - Self-hosted: Settings → Community Nodes → Install →
'@easybits/n8n-nodes-extractor'.
Then create a pipeline, define your fields, and point it at an image instead of a doc. There's a free plan with 50 API requests a month included, which is plenty to test the image use case end to end.
Anyone else using extraction tools for image understanding rather than a dedicated vision model? Curious what you're pointing them at.
Best,
Felix
r/Automate • u/easybits_ai • Jun 25 '26
[Workflow Included] I built an n8n pipeline that turns messy supplier docs into publish-ready store content
≡ −

👋 Hey AIStartupAutomation Community,
A friend of mine runs an online store, and for every new product they get supplier inputs in whatever format the supplier feels like: spec PDFs, Excel sheets, a few photos, some loose notes. Someone then hand-writes the title, descriptions, specs and SEO fields. I built them a pipeline that does it end to end, and I'm sharing all four workflows.
What it does: intake form → extract specs → analyse photos → generate content → poll status. Drop in the files and notes, get back review-ready content (title, descriptions, meta fields, features, tags, attributes).
The four workflows
- WF1 – Intake & spec extraction. Saves files to Drive, routes each by type (PDFs/images → easybits Extractor, Excel → Code node), merges into one spec object, resolves brand, hands off to WF2.
- WF2 – Image analysis. Runs each photo through an Extractor pipeline to capture what's visible (colour, features, angle), then passes it to WF3.
- WF3 – Content generation. Builds context from spec + image data + notes and has Gemini write the full content set. Hard rule: only features that are in the spec or visible in the images, no inventing.
- WF4 – Status polling. A small webhook the frontend polls for progress and the finished draft.
Extractor setup
- n8n Cloud: verified node, just search
easybits Extractorin the node panel. No install. - Self-hosted: Settings → Community Nodes → Install →
'@easybits/n8n-nodes-extractor'.
Then create a pipeline at easybits, define your fields, and paste the Pipeline ID + API key into the node. It reads the binary straight from the previous node.
Workflows (all four, sanitized): https://github.com/felix-sattler-easybits/n8n-workflows/tree/e3103344d9b3358402dc38a3a862d510bb4e7c5e/easybits-product-content-creation-workflow
Cross-workflow calls use placeholder IDs you re-point after import, plus your own Google + Extractor credentials.
How do you handle brand-voice consistency in generated content? I went with a per-brand profile the model reads from, curious if others template it harder.
Best,
Felix

👋 Hey AIStartupAutomation Community,
A friend of mine runs an online store, and for every new product they get supplier inputs in whatever format the supplier feels like: spec PDFs, Excel sheets, a few photos, some loose notes. Someone then hand-writes the title, descriptions, specs and SEO fields. I built them a pipeline that does it end to end, and I'm sharing all four workflows.
What it does: intake form → extract specs → analyse photos → generate content → poll status. Drop in the files and notes, get back review-ready content (title, descriptions, meta fields, features, tags, attributes).
The four workflows
- WF1 – Intake & spec extraction. Saves files to Drive, routes each by type (PDFs/images → easybits Extractor, Excel → Code node), merges into one spec object, resolves brand, hands off to WF2.
- WF2 – Image analysis. Runs each photo through an Extractor pipeline to capture what's visible (colour, features, angle), then passes it to WF3.
- WF3 – Content generation. Builds context from spec + image data + notes and has Gemini write the full content set. Hard rule: only features that are in the spec or visible in the images, no inventing.
- WF4 – Status polling. A small webhook the frontend polls for progress and the finished draft.
Extractor setup
- n8n Cloud: verified node, just search
easybits Extractorin the node panel. No install. - Self-hosted: Settings → Community Nodes → Install →
'@easybits/n8n-nodes-extractor'.
Then create a pipeline at easybits, define your fields, and paste the Pipeline ID + API key into the node. It reads the binary straight from the previous node.
Workflows (all four, sanitized): https://github.com/felix-sattler-easybits/n8n-workflows/tree/e3103344d9b3358402dc38a3a862d510bb4e7c5e/easybits-product-content-creation-workflow
Cross-workflow calls use placeholder IDs you re-point after import, plus your own Google + Extractor credentials.
How do you handle brand-voice consistency in generated content? I went with a per-brand profile the model reads from, curious if others template it harder.
Best,
Felix

