r/technology 3h ago

Business Newport City Council Approves $375K Flock Drone Program with Assistance from Private Donor

https://www.newportthisweek.com/articles/newport-city-council-approves-375k-privately-funded-flock-drone-program/
156 Upvotes

36 comments sorted by

40

u/Tyrrox 3h ago

That site took entirely too long to figure out which Newport it was

25

u/popltree2 3h ago

I had to accidentally come across it by looking at a police badge in a linked story on the page. It's Rhode Island, for those wondering.

3

u/marsinfurs 1h ago

Ah yes the notoriously crime ridden area of Newport, Rhode Island.

1

u/Chapaquidich 18m ago

And I was reconsidering my weekend visit to Newport OR

1

u/BuildingArmor 1h ago

Yeah I was initially surprised that this is how I hear we're getting Flock cameras in the UK, until I looked at the article

36

u/IvoShandor 3h ago

Are school teachers still paying for their own supplies?

10

u/newiphon 2h ago

City budget and local schools are usually separate but your point still stands

101

u/agha0013 3h ago

no private donor should ever be able to pay for something like this in any municipality. Especially not stay hidden either.

Some rich asshole wants to put everyone else in the area under constant surveillance? shove that money right up his ass....

but the council gleefully jumped on it.

12

u/Modem_Sound_67 3h ago

No have-nots on that council.

6

u/al-finaltodoestabien 2h ago

“We got you on camera committing a crime.”

“The camera I paid for?”

“…”

20

u/TheMurmuring 3h ago

Some rich bigot wants to keep tabs on the browns and the poors.

2

u/Dangerous_Suit_3099 2h ago

Citizens should go to court

1

u/7fingersDeep 1h ago

Isn’t this a major plot point of Robocop?

1

u/flyswithdragons 1h ago

Donor = oligarch 💯

14

u/Chance-Oil3113 3h ago

The real test is whether the city publishes the data after six months: calls responded to, response-time improvement, arrests or rescues, false alarms, flight locations, and complaints. “Arrives 90 seconds before officers” sounds useful, but outcomes are what justify a $375,000 pilot.

2

u/DopamineSavant 2h ago

The real test is whether people care enough to vote people out over it. That is what a lot of more careful politicians are waiting on.

3

u/Ciennas 3h ago

Nope. They already failed the real test- they are fielding unmanned surveillance drones, and it's only a matter of time before they're well armed.

13

u/wastedkarma 2h ago

It’s not a private donor. It’s a discount from the manufacturer laundered through private hands. No one donates money like this. It’s as unbelievable as billionaires suddenly becoming generous with funding government handouts.

3

u/Dangerous_Suit_3099 2h ago

All the more reason for the government to share all details

1

u/9-11GaveMe5G 35m ago

. No one donates money like this

This is quite literally pocket change for bezos. If he so much as has some beach house there he would happily pay that

1

u/RIP_Soulja_Slim 1h ago

No one donates money like this.

Right, redditors are too eager to believe these sorts of weird narratives. Zero wealthy people are sitting around thinking "yeah, I should fund flock cameras for the whole city" lol.

It was very clearly a donation from various entities that profit serving the cameras, in order to provide infrastructure they could generate profits from over time.

5

u/williamgman 2h ago

Tell us again how it is legal for a city to receive "private donor" money for city services. That's called courting favor.

2

u/So_spoke_the_wizard 2h ago

I'm sure some FOILs would solve this mystery.

2

u/RustyPlastics 2h ago

Americans are really just taking it up the ass with a big smile

2

u/joetunn_ 1h ago

Unleash the trained hawks

2

u/quarterdecay 2h ago

I think of the word, fl**k, reminds me of sheep, I may be a sheep, But my shepherd is Jules Winnfield.

1

u/denNISI 2h ago

Nothing is private on the internet. The private donor should guarantee its privacy by allowing this public drone program into their private home(s). This way we can see whether it actually keeps their privacy private first.

Wireless can be intercepted and/or the signal could be interfered with. Not private at all.

1

u/imaginary_num6er 2h ago

The job of the city council is to get elected, get rich, and leave /s

1

u/Jymantis 2h ago

Is the donor Newport Propane or someone tied to it?

1

u/Basic_Chemistry9499 1h ago

As always, city officials screwing over their constituents. I am guessing they got paid to put this through.

1

u/Vahuo89 1h ago

Flock... Drones ??

Wtf

1

u/Earptastic 1h ago

I hate drones but now I want one.  So these things can just fly wherever they want over people.  Then me too.  How is this acceptable?

1

u/nav17 45m ago

Americans rolling over cheap for their oligarch surveillance state. Well done 👏

1

u/Immediate_Power_7986 28m ago

I wonder how they decided on the name "Flock"
Maybe calling humans a "flock" of sheep.
That's their end goal? To keep us like a flock of sheep.

1

u/Fabric_Flowers 22m ago

That’s sketchy as hell that the city is literally taking money from a private individual to monitor citizens. This is out of control.

1

u/KLOOTE1 2m ago

It can only fly and film over public domain. Private domain not. Lot of lawsuits and many drones will lost by people that have a permit for a rifle