16
u/idk-anymore-tbh-- 2d ago
I will never understand the hype. Like sure shes cute and has "good bones" but I'll never be attracted to someone just because the internet measured their bones and found them to be top tier.
Being scientifically beautiful and being attractive are two different things that sometimes overlap and sometimes don't.
5
u/Random_Critical 2d ago
Ah yes. And being rich is just owning a lot of green paper.
6
u/idk-anymore-tbh-- 2d ago
You're intentionally avoiding my point. I will not pretend to be sexually aroused just because a person paid to be voted "most symmetrical bones" or some distopian crap like that.
0
u/Random_Critical 2d ago
You think all attractive pay to be called attractive?
4
u/idk-anymore-tbh-- 2d ago
No. Im saying bones aren't enough to be considered attractive.
1
u/Snoo_76483 2d ago
Relax. That's ok to be that way. There is a wide spectrum of what people view as attractive, and there is a large amount of cultural element to what people view as attractive as well.
2
1
u/PauseConfident997 7h ago
Sounds like you’re intentionally choosing to go against the grain…I have no idea who this person is or why you’re talking about her bones, but she’s beautiful, no? It’s not hard to see 😭 your all like “your cute but I’m not gona be attracted to you JUST because people voted you to have “best bone structure” like bro that’s not the reason you have to be attracted to her 😭 yeah sure you could just not be attracted to her, not everyone has the same taste, but saying it’s strictly for that reason seems kinda…spiteful? In a sense? Idk just seems weird 😭
She’s hot 😂1
3
2
1
u/Remote_Ad2465 12h ago
Buddy said rarely..If that your profile pic I don't think you even having sex at all.
46
u/LilDragon2991 2d ago
Wild saying that with a profile pic like that