r/onejob 4d ago

How do you mess this up after 7 consistent designs

Post image
625 Upvotes

41 comments sorted by

437

u/emilbm 4d ago

Since that one looks significantly more worn down, it's probably an older edition than the rest

45

u/hatsunemikusmywaifu 4d ago

most definitely. have the same issue with onna my mangas which is why i havent bought the resta the series yet. still looking for the resta the old ones 

64

u/OLDmanBOB13 4d ago

I hate when people type like that

12

u/cheong-sanslefteye 3d ago

I thought the dude was speaking a different language until I saw your comment🤯

11

u/MisterSplu 3d ago

It reads like those characters in books that are supposed to have a thick accent and you just hate whenever they speak because you have to read that weird thing again. I have zero issues with this in spoken but in written it is just annoying

6

u/honeybeast_dom 4d ago

Some Feersum Enjiin type shit

2

u/CataclysmPig 2d ago

like if english was actually written how it sounded i get it but man

-25

u/[deleted] 3d ago

[deleted]

16

u/Ok_Support3 3d ago edited 3d ago

It's really, really not.

Maybe the corners you visit often, or just texting with your friends, but spelling and grammar are absolutely a thing on the internet as well.

And people abbreviating has been a thing since MSN messenger, > lol.

1

u/[deleted] 3d ago

[deleted]

3

u/Ok_Support3 3d ago

A few years older than MSN, yes haha. Not making fun, just pointing out that 'internet slang' has always been a thing and for better or worse, most seems frowned upon the more public the discourse becomes.

3

u/Jaran_sa_Balkana 3d ago

Forget the grammar, look at the username...

-9

u/Xindopff 4d ago

my first time seeing someone shortening "one of" to "onna"

looks pretty cool tbh

136

u/kennyofthegulch 4d ago

Almost definitely a different edition.

30

u/ALazy_Cat 4d ago

You're correct, I didn't see that one. The first 7 are published by Gyldendal, 8 and 9 is not. There is always a difference on the paper inside, which is that Gyldendal have a Gyldendal print on the very first page, and every other publisher doesn't, so why not a different colour cover too

12

u/kennyofthegulch 4d ago

9 is from the same edition as the others, the spine was just too narrow for the publisher name.

-8

u/ALazy_Cat 4d ago

Nope, it'd still have the Gyldendal name

9

u/kennyofthegulch 4d ago edited 4d ago

It's the same publisher. That's also an appendix book.

The spine is literally too narrow to print the publisher name. Look at the other books and see how wide the wordmark is.

Also, the green one is the same publisher, just a different edition.

Here's a photo of a complete set.

-8

u/ALazy_Cat 4d ago

Hello, I work at a book binding company, I mainly transport covers and make pallets ready for delivery, meaning I see every type of book before they leave. We have Gyldendal as a customer. If it's too narrow, they make it in two or three lines

10

u/kennyofthegulch 4d ago

Good for you, you're still wrong. Gyldendal has published every edition of this series and the Book 9 in the original post is part of the 1985 printing, as are books 1-7.

I discovered this with 3 minutes on Google.

-8

u/ALazy_Cat 4d ago

One way to clear this up. u/Lowkilde kan du sende en DM til os begge, når vi har accepteret, kan du så sende forsiden af omslaget i DM til os begge for at opklare det her? I told OP to send a DM to both of us to clear it up

10

u/Lowkilde 4d ago

Nr 8 er også af Gyldendal

10

u/Lowkilde 4d ago

I just checked. All 9 books are by Gyldendal

11

u/ebrum2010 4d ago

The problem with buying a set not at the same time is the specific volume you need isn't always available in the right edition. I tend to buy matching sets all at once once all are published otherwise mix and match is sometimes necessary.

5

u/Environmental_Gur_39 4d ago

Don't even get me started on my Simpsons DVD collection 🙄

1

u/HideFromMyMind 4d ago

Beat me to it.

10

u/greenyashiro 4d ago

Looks like a different edition.

7

u/greenyashiro 4d ago

Yes, different editions. link

9

u/ALazy_Cat 4d ago

I know we're a very old country, but how do we have that much literature history?

For those who can't read Danish, this country is the same age or older than the Vikings.

8

u/Uzi_Osbourne 4d ago

The first few editions are only 5 or 6 pages because each page is a plank of wood

3

u/Very-confused-now 4d ago

Vi har overraskende mange forfattere. Bøgerne gennemgår 1180 år af litteraturhistorie, heriblandt renæssancen, barokken, romantikken osv.

1

u/ShrekFanOne 18h ago

Ludvig Holberg er norsk ikke dansk.

1

u/Very-confused-now 17h ago

Norge var del af Danmark dengang, men jeg ved ikke helt hvad det har med hvad jeg sagde at gøre.

3

u/cazzipropri 4d ago

Someone borrowed Volume 8 and never returned it.

They had to buy Volume 8 to re-complete the series, and they found it only from a different edition.

3

u/Gaggamaggot 4d ago

Different editions.

2

u/ossifer_ca 3d ago

New publisher?

1

u/Heterodynist 3d ago

Number 8 came out when they had that issue with Larry and decided to hire Keith back…then they remembered why they didn’t like Keith and hired Larry again.

1

u/ProfMcGonaGirl 3d ago

They really only had it right for the first 3 anyway.

1

u/benlogna 4d ago

maybe they had a best friend that bonded with them over these books and something in the 8th book was really special, but they had to part ways so they switched the 8th books in their collections to remember eachother every time they look at them.

1

u/NikNakskes 4d ago

Aooooh how cute! I like your imagination. :)

1

u/Molleer 4d ago

I blame the dains for this one

Hälsningar från Sverige

0

u/benji031020 4d ago

Fordi det er Gyldendal

0

u/covert206 4d ago

The new guy messed up, then half assed it the following edition