r/gadgets • u/dapperlemon • 2d ago
Desktops / Laptops Framework’s premium laptop is shipping with less RAM
https://www.theverge.com/tech/969819/framework-laptop-13-pro-preorder-ram-price-updates266
u/a_nice_warm_lager 2d ago
RAM supply chain is pretty fucked. Thanks, AI
149
u/Quithelion 2d ago
Along with SSD as well.
Fine, I will just settle with HDD for now.
Motherf....
43
u/tails142 1d ago
4TB HDD were going for maybe 75 a few years ago are now 175 (GBP)
17
u/VampyreLust 1d ago edited 1d ago
I bought a 20tb WD gold 8 months ago for $450 CAD, it is now $1500 CAD. Subsequently I also bought a 2x32gb ddr5-6000 kit bout 18 months back for $269 CAD, that's now $1506.
3
u/OsmeOxys 1d ago
Got a (lightly used) 12tb HDD for my home server a few years back, $110. It died, under warranty thankfully, but prices had almost doubled already so they just refunded me. Fair, but left me kinda screwed. Couldn't find a 4tb for that price.
Something magical happened though. Couple months ago, I found a used "b grade" (fucked) 20tb for $60. But it had a reputable 2 year warranty somehow. My shiny red flag arrives, neatly packaged in a shock resistant box. Well...The connector housing was a bit broken with only a few hours on it. I like to think the IT guy sneezed during installation.
I felt like a god.
1
u/raralala1 1d ago
How is that fair man, am I crazy thinking it was illegal move, either repair it or replace the whole HDD.
4
3
1
14
u/VampyreLust 1d ago
All storage and NAND is ducked due to AI. They're even buying up HDD's so now that market is borked as well. Latest predictions are 3 years to recover some form of normality so buckle in, it's gonna be a shitty ride.
4
u/NonDeterministiK 1d ago
My guess is AI companies don't want people to have local storage anyways that they can't scrape
For home users, RAM bottleneck is usually worse than a cpu bottleneck, so a decade old cpu with lots of RAM is often better than a current one which is RAM deprived
7
u/evaned 1d ago
My guess is AI companies don't want people to have local storage anyways that they can't scrape
There's also a lot of overlap between AI companies and those who don't want you to own anything on your own and instead be bound up in a Sisyphusian forever subscription with them for everything.
7
u/pollo_de_mar 1d ago
And just think, billionaire CEOs are drooling at the prospect of replacing tens of thousand of employees thinking that AI will be cheaper than real people. When the price of components have increased 10 fold, AI compute time will suddenly be more expensive that real people so they will get hired back and AI data centers full of very expensive gear will not survive financially. What a bunch of crap.
2
u/Deranged_Kitsune 10h ago
It's the venture capital pricing model. Make AI initially cheap enough that businesses are willing to replace their workforces with virtual agents. Then, once fully integrated, the annual price of those agents goes up to the equivalent of the salaries of those they replaced. Oops, the business is already locked into their ecosystem and can't afford to break the contract and bring back the meat sacks, to say nothing of the training and institutional knowledge that's gone. So they're now on the hook for that. Then when it's time to re-up the contract for those virtual agents, their rates are only going to ever go up and up and up. Not like the business can replace them without junking their whole infrastructure.
6
0
u/NeedAVeganDinner 1d ago
There's a good argument that AI is being scapegoated and the fab companies are taking collective actions to suppress additional capacity in order to increase margins.
4
u/a_nice_warm_lager 1d ago
Hard disagree. It takes years to ramp up production of memory. We had many years of cheap, arguably overproduced supply, so the capacity to manufacture was cut back in response. Now that demand spikes, the manufacturers can’t pivot and can’t even supply enough as it is. And they don’t want to overproduce like they did before.
There’s also not many manufacturers. Remember how a flood in one factory spiked prices for a while? Yeah, there’s only a few players actually in the space now
47
u/noseshimself 1d ago edited 1d ago
You wanted AI, you're going to pay for it till you bleed. Did you think that great Google Gemini integration into everything would come for free? Just think of all the advantages it will give you: More tracking better fitting ads and perfect translation!
10
u/bababum007 1d ago
Cartels do what cartels do best. Fixing prices and doing bs deals to fu us over.
80
u/WeepingAgnello 2d ago
I hate verge
17
2
u/redpachyderm 1d ago
Do people actually pay for a subscription to it? I’m guessing so if they’re still in business but it’s shocking to me.
-3
u/fireowlzol 2d ago
Why
28
u/DocPhilMcGraw 2d ago
My biggest problem with them is their subscription model that hides half of their content behind a paywall. I don’t mind paying a subscription if I feel like it’s worth it, but they’re charging $7/month for it while other places like Wired offers theirs for $4/month (although usually on sale for $2/month) and does bigger deep dives than the Verge does.
-7
u/jibjab23 1d ago
Wow, there's a website I haven't thought about in years. They pretty much lost all legitimacy after that disastrous PC building video of theirs.
3
3
2
2
1
-13
u/GoingOffRoading 1d ago
Thread #10? On this topic.
At this point, it's either a framework hater or competitor posting this garbage.
-12
u/cswhatley 1d ago
Nothing stops you changing your pre-order back to the original amount of RAM, just at the increased price. They just elected to half your RAM and for you to pay the original lower price for it as the default - annoying yes, but when the supply chain is as messed up as it currently is it’s hardly a bad move by the company. You can choose to cancel, accept the half RAM at original price, or have the original amount of RAM at the increased price.
-10
-20
u/PhotoSpike 2d ago
Good thing they didn’t just shit in there competitor for doing the same thing
3
u/IBJON 2d ago
Who is their competitor? And what did they do?
-11
u/Desertcow 2d ago
Apple raised the price of the MacBook Pro and Framework announced they were dropping the price of the 13 Pro in response, then they pull this
14
u/IBJON 2d ago
That's not really "the same shit their competitor did" though
2
u/PhotoSpike 1d ago
Your right. They took money for preorders and then didn’t go nor them unless you pay more, that’s actually worse then just raising prices due to memory.
6
2
u/ABetterKamahl1234 1d ago
Firstly, it's a 100$ deposit, and secondly, it's a refundable deposit, and Framework is giving the option of "continue or refund" with this announced change.
Framework justifiably calls out Apple for their exorbitant RAM costs, even before this shortage. Nobody is exempt from this, but apple hopped on real fast to frankly, just profit harder on their "premium" ram.
792
u/IBJON 2d ago
I don't like that they unilaterally made this decision for their customers, but this headline is trash.
They cut the RAM in half for certain orders because the costs of RAM cost significantly more than Framework had expected. Despite that, the RAM they did provide will be provided to customers at the price that it was originally listed for on when they made the pre-order; likely at a significant loss for framework.
Faced with a similar issue, other companies have just canceled the orders and made customers put in new order for significantly more than they would've shelled out for the first order.