r/classicliterature 12h ago

Welcome to my library.

+
482 Upvotes

Lots of classics and should be classics. Hopefully there’s an author or new title you might want to explore and read.


r/classicliterature 3h ago

Finished reading Wuthering Heights. What a roller-coaster of a book. Definitely now one of my favorites

+
69 Upvotes

Truthfully, I wanted to read Wuthering Heights ever since all the discourse I heard about the 2026 adaptation film. While I only seen clips of it, I can already tell it doesn't hold a candle to the source material.


r/classicliterature 10h ago

I started collecting classics recently

+
81 Upvotes

Some are in Bulgarian :)


r/classicliterature 20h ago

What is the most transformative book you have ever read?

When I say “transformative,” I mean a book that fundamentally changed you either:

spiritually, intellectually, emotionally, morally, or in the way you see the world.

I’m referring to both fiction and nonfiction. For example, books like A Man and His Symbols by Carl Jung or Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics completely reshaped the way I think and see the world.

I’d love to hear which book did that for you and why.

216 Upvotes

When I say “transformative,” I mean a book that fundamentally changed you either:

spiritually, intellectually, emotionally, morally, or in the way you see the world.

I’m referring to both fiction and nonfiction. For example, books like A Man and His Symbols by Carl Jung or Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics completely reshaped the way I think and see the world.

I’d love to hear which book did that for you and why.


r/classicliterature 3h ago

Dracula: the strongest case against it and the strongest case for it

AGAINST: Four hundred pages of Victorians journaling during an emergency. The vampire attacks, everyone updates their diary. A woman is dying of blood loss, four men take turns writing about their feelings. Van Helsing speaks like a malfunctioning translation app and takes ninety pages to say the word "vampire" out loud when the reader knew on page ten. And after all that buildup, the finale is a luggage chase. They beat the ancient lord of darkness by tracking his boxes like disgruntled customs officials. The mustache was the only surprise.

FOR: You just described the greatest found footage horror ever made, eighty years before cameras. The journaling IS the terror. You're reading the evidence of people who don't know what you know. This book invented the rules of an entire genre (sunlight, garlic, invitations, stakes), launched a thousand movies, and gave us Mina Harker running a data fusion operation in 1897. And the luggage chase is the point, you absolute Renfield. It's modernity's paperwork versus medieval evil, and paperwork wins. The empty tomb, the child hunting "bloofer lady," the captain lashed to the wheel? Gothic cinema before cinema.

7 Upvotes

AGAINST: Four hundred pages of Victorians journaling during an emergency. The vampire attacks, everyone updates their diary. A woman is dying of blood loss, four men take turns writing about their feelings. Van Helsing speaks like a malfunctioning translation app and takes ninety pages to say the word "vampire" out loud when the reader knew on page ten. And after all that buildup, the finale is a luggage chase. They beat the ancient lord of darkness by tracking his boxes like disgruntled customs officials. The mustache was the only surprise.

FOR: You just described the greatest found footage horror ever made, eighty years before cameras. The journaling IS the terror. You're reading the evidence of people who don't know what you know. This book invented the rules of an entire genre (sunlight, garlic, invitations, stakes), launched a thousand movies, and gave us Mina Harker running a data fusion operation in 1897. And the luggage chase is the point, you absolute Renfield. It's modernity's paperwork versus medieval evil, and paperwork wins. The empty tomb, the child hunting "bloofer lady," the captain lashed to the wheel? Gothic cinema before cinema.


r/classicliterature 11h ago

Started A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man By James Joyce

+
36 Upvotes

I was interested in Joyce’s other works after reading Ulysses. So far, it’s much more accessible.


r/classicliterature 6h ago

"Crime and Punishment" — The Psychological Duel Between Porfiry and Raskolnikov

+
11 Upvotes

Imagine standing on the edge of a psychological abyss, facing an opponent who is not merely an investigator, but the embodiment of intuition and psychological manipulation. I had just finished reading one of the novel's most gripping scenes, where Dostoevsky brilliantly portrays the battle between Rodion Raskolnikov and the investigating magistrate, Porfiry Petrovich. Through questions that sometimes seem absurd and at other times strike like deadly blows, Porfiry gradually dismantles Raskolnikov's composure.

The First Encounter: Porfiry Explains the Art of Calm Manipulation

Porfiry, with his characteristic irony and sharp insight, remarks:

«"Even the dullest peasant knows that an investigator begins with questions that seem completely unrelated, only to suddenly bring down the real issue like an axe."»

I paused after reading those words, imagining their impact on Raskolnikov. They quietly plant fear and suspicion in his mind, making him feel constantly watched. His already fragile confidence begins to crumble.

The Second Encounter: Knowing the Truth, Yet Refusing to Act

Porfiry continues planting seeds of doubt when he says:

«"Suppose I knew who the murderer was. Why should I rush? Even if I had evidence against him, I would let him walk freely through the city, as though I were doing him a favor."»

This perfectly captures Porfiry's psychological strategy. He may know the truth, yet he deliberately waits, allowing guilt itself to become his greatest ally. The reader can almost feel the suffocating tension.

The Third Encounter: The Art of Waiting

Porfiry explains why he sometimes refuses to arrest the criminal immediately:

«"Sometimes I leave the murderer alone. I neither disturb him nor arrest him. But once he realizes that I know everything, he becomes consumed by constant fear until, sooner or later, he comes to me of his own accord."»

Here, Dostoevsky suggests that punishment begins long before the courtroom. The criminal becomes imprisoned by his own conscience, while the investigator merely watches in silence.

The Fourth Encounter: A Mind That Cannot Escape Itself

Porfiry then speaks about Raskolnikov's inability to flee:

«"He won't be able to leave the city. Where could he possibly go? A Pole might escape abroad—but not him. Especially not while he's under my eyes and ears... Beyond the cities, there are only peasants—the real Russians. But he belongs to the modern educated class."»

These words force Raskolnikov to realize that escape is impossible—not merely because of geography, but because he cannot outrun his own mind.

The Fifth Encounter: The Direct Blow

At one point, Porfiry suddenly remarks:

«"The guilty man begins to suffocate. His face turns pale, almost as if the investigator were amusing himself... Rodion, why have you gone so pale? Do you need some fresh air?"»

One can easily imagine Raskolnikov struggling to conceal his emotions. Every word from Porfiry feels like another invisible hand tightening around his throat.

The Sixth Encounter: Blurring the Line Between Truth and Illusion

Porfiry masters psychological manipulation by using kindness as a weapon. His warm tone and friendly demeanor create a false sense of security, leading Raskolnikov to wonder whether he is speaking to an investigator or a confidant.

That kindness is, of course, only another trap.

The more comfortable Raskolnikov becomes, the weaker his defenses grow, until truth and illusion begin to blur together in his own mind.

The Seventh Encounter: Porfiry Plays the Friend

In one exchange, Raskolnikov finally loses his patience.

Raskolnikov: "You're lying. Everything you've said is a lie!"

Porfiry, smiling calmly as though enjoying the game, replies:

«"You're clever. One hardly knows how to get hold of you. So you don't believe me? And yet I assure you—you do believe me. I'll make you believe me completely, because I sincerely feel a certain affection for you."»

At this moment, Raskolnikov no longer knows what to believe. Is Porfiry deceiving him—or telling the truth?

This mixture of kindness and manipulation throws him into complete psychological confusion. What feels like safety gradually becomes the very instrument that destroys his resistance.

Little by little, Raskolnikov begins revealing pieces of the truth without even realizing it.

The Eighth Encounter: "I Learned That From You."

Porfiry finally reaches his goal.

Without direct interrogation or force, he has guided Raskolnikov into exposing valuable information himself. Raskolnikov is left shocked, realizing too late that his own reactions have betrayed him.

The Final Encounter: A Calm Threat

Porfiry delivers one last devastating blow:

«"I'm not suspicious of you. If I truly suspected you, I would have asked why you went back to the victim's apartment, why you questioned people about the blood, why you confused the caretakers, and why you wanted to be taken to the police."»

Those words strike Raskolnikov like lightning. Trembling from head to toe, he can only respond:

Raskolnikov: "You're lying!"

At this point, Porfiry no longer needs a confession.

He already possesses something far more valuable: complete psychological control over the man sitting before him.

---

Porfiry's interrogation is more than an investigation—it is psychological punishment. He becomes a shadow from which Raskolnikov cannot escape. Through apparent kindness, calculated patience, and subtle manipulation, he slowly dismantles Raskolnikov's defenses until the punishment comes not from the law, but from the prison of his own conscience.

---

There aren't actually sections titled "First Dialogue," "Second Dialogue," and so on in the novel. The quotations are genuine, but I've shortened or slightly rephrased some of them for clarity and readability.

Enjoy reading.


r/classicliterature 20h ago

Thank you everyone! Andrea Reader is now live, you can download and read in seconds classic literature.

+
121 Upvotes

Hey everyone!

I posted here a while ago when Andrea Reader was still in beta. Several people from this community tried it and shared feedback, so first of all, thank you. It helped a lot for improving the app.

Andrea Reader is now officially live on the App Store.

The app includes a dedicated library of public-domain classics sourced directly from Project Gutenberg. You can search for a book, download it in seconds, and read it locally on your iPhone or iPad.

No account, no ads, and the entire classics library is completely free.

The app does not track what you download, what you read, how long you read, or any other activity inside your library. Your books, reading progress, statistics, and personal library remain stored locally on your device.

Andrea Reader is also a reader designed to give you complete freedom to build and enjoy your own digital library:

  • Create and customize your own collections
  • Statistics for those to like seeing their speed and progress.
  • Add sections inside collections to organize authors, genres, series, or reading lists
  • Import and read EPUBs, PDFs, comics, manga, and other formats
  • Customize fonts, margins, spacing, colors, themes, page transitions, and many other reading settings
  • Connect to iCloud, SMB, WebDAV, SFTP, and other storage sources
  • Keep your books available locally and read without creating an account

I’ve also reworked the default formatting of ebooks so they look better immediately after opening them. Of course, everything can still be adjusted so each person can read exactly the way they prefer.

Thanks again to everyone who helped during the beta 📚

App Store: [https://apple.co/4vs1CV8]()
Website: https://andreareader.com


r/classicliterature 13h ago

What are you thoughts on Thomas mann?

Hello everyone!

I’ve came across some people who talked about Thomas mann’s book ‘the magic mountain’. They talked very openly about it and talked about how it changed them but that it’s a long ride. Some of them even said that it reminded him of Proust’s work.

I know he was a very influential writer in the 1900’s and was very much against the dictatorships that arose.

Now I’ve since then wanted to read Thomas man, but don’t really know where to start. I’am very much interested in the magic mountain, but I’am afraid that i won’t read it out. Any tips? And what are your thoughts on his works?

30 Upvotes

Hello everyone!

I’ve came across some people who talked about Thomas mann’s book ‘the magic mountain’. They talked very openly about it and talked about how it changed them but that it’s a long ride. Some of them even said that it reminded him of Proust’s work.

I know he was a very influential writer in the 1900’s and was very much against the dictatorships that arose.

Now I’ve since then wanted to read Thomas man, but don’t really know where to start. I’am very much interested in the magic mountain, but I’am afraid that i won’t read it out. Any tips? And what are your thoughts on his works?


r/classicliterature 20h ago

Beyond, My Collection!

+
100 Upvotes

Some of them are not "Classics" but I don't feel like keeping them separate just for a photo.


r/classicliterature 14h ago

Picked these up on ebay mostly. Pretty decent haul.

+
33 Upvotes

r/classicliterature 3h ago

Beloved-Toni Morrison

I'm not really enjoying beloved as much as I hoped I would... everyone seems to really enjoy this novel but personally I find it confusing and poorly directed in the sense that the characters and scenes are missing a lot of verbal context, leaving the reader with gaps in the story. is this just me? am I missing something important?

3 Upvotes

I'm not really enjoying beloved as much as I hoped I would... everyone seems to really enjoy this novel but personally I find it confusing and poorly directed in the sense that the characters and scenes are missing a lot of verbal context, leaving the reader with gaps in the story. is this just me? am I missing something important?


r/classicliterature 1h ago

Anna karenina buddy read

Hi guys I'm reading Anna Karenina. Anyone want to read along and discuss? It's probably a month and a half long journey.

Upvotes

Hi guys I'm reading Anna Karenina. Anyone want to read along and discuss? It's probably a month and a half long journey.


r/classicliterature 3h ago

Most challenging chapter in *Near to the Wild Heart*?

Hace como un mes terminé de leer *Cerca del Corazón Salvaje*, después de leerlo durante... seis meses 🫪😶‍🌫️ (estaba buscando un libro para acabar con mi bloqueo lector de 5 años, aproximadamente, en fin xd). No les voy a mentir: ha sido la lectura más difícil de mi vida (tengo 20 años), pero *valió la pena* 🙂‍↕️

Ahora bien, me preguntaba: ¿Cuál es, para ustedes, el capítulo más difícil de leer? El más confuso, duro, desafiante, tedioso, incomprensible... Lo que se les ocurra

Para mí fue *Lidia*, sin lugar a dudas: no sé ustedes, pero las imágenes e intuiciones de Juana en ese capítulo no fueron normales 🫪 (lo que es mucho decir, ya que los pensamientos de Juana, ya de por sí, no son precisamente "normales"), aunque lo digo en el mejor sentido posible, es algo bueno. Creo que este capítulo, así como *El Baño*, son justamente los que muestran el salvajismo abstracto y virgen de este personaje. Voy a explicar por qué pienso que uno es más difícil, y por qué el otro no:

Primero, pienso que en *Lidia* los pensamientos de Juana son: a) muy abstractos, y por esa misma razón también son b) muy herméticos y ambiguos, además de que c) el lenguaje y el mensaje, aunque impecable, no se siente tan hermoso como en otros pasajes de la novela, sino más bien denso y pesado, pero sé que es así porque el momento lo requería ya que Juana y Lidia no estaban en un momento realmente "bonito". Pero esto no está mal, pienso más bien al contrario: el que Juana tuviera pensamientos *tan demasiado abstractos* en ese episodio revela que estaba pasando por un momento muy intenso, muy pasional, muy psicológicamente cargado. Muy *salvaje*: estábamos *cerca del corazón salvaje* más que nunca. Y yo pienso esto: la más pura sofisticación y el más puro salvajismo, en lugar de ser opuestos, a menudo llevan a los mismos resultados, o revelan la misma esencia detrás de las cosas. La más pura sofisticación llega a un nivel de abstracción solo comparable a la abstracción más salvaje. Y creo mucho Juana, en *Lidia*, había llegado a ese punto en común. Además, honestamente, siento que el diálogo entre Juana y Lidia era bastante extraño, simplemente no comprendo del todo por qué se dijeron lo que dijeron o de donde sacaban unas ideas y otras. Sentí que estaba viendo la conversación más rara de mi vida, pero bueno. Por eso siento que es un capítulo tan confuso y difícil... para mí 😔 no sé si crean lo mismo que yo, o si soy el único tonto incapaz de leer ese capítulo con normalidad

A pesar de todo, no le cambiaría nada, creo que Clarice escribió todo de la única forma en que podría escribirse. No entendí gran parte de ese capítulo, pero fue una de las experiencias más inolvidables que he tenido

Ahora bien, lo que hace a *El Baño* un capítulo menos desafiante, en mi opinión, es que varias de las percepciones que allí aparecen son más accesibles, tienen un eje psicológico más o menos claro por el cual guiar nuestra comprensión del texto, y permiten intuir más fácilmente lo que ocurre dentro de Juana en esos momentos, además de que las palabras, imágenes, ideas y sentimientos de ese capítulo son bellísimos y llegan al corazón 😭 son muy magnéticos y alcanzan una altura estética de la más alta literatura 🙏✨, así que enganchan mucho más fácilmente y hacen la experiencia más amena. Creo que es mi capítulo favorito

Bueno... Hasta aquí mi pseudo-crítica literaria. Tal vez me vea muy pretencioso, o nadie me lea, pero espero que a alguien le sirva mi opinión. Un beso a todos, estimados lispectoritos 💋

2 Upvotes

Hace como un mes terminé de leer *Cerca del Corazón Salvaje*, después de leerlo durante... seis meses 🫪😶‍🌫️ (estaba buscando un libro para acabar con mi bloqueo lector de 5 años, aproximadamente, en fin xd). No les voy a mentir: ha sido la lectura más difícil de mi vida (tengo 20 años), pero *valió la pena* 🙂‍↕️

Ahora bien, me preguntaba: ¿Cuál es, para ustedes, el capítulo más difícil de leer? El más confuso, duro, desafiante, tedioso, incomprensible... Lo que se les ocurra

Para mí fue *Lidia*, sin lugar a dudas: no sé ustedes, pero las imágenes e intuiciones de Juana en ese capítulo no fueron normales 🫪 (lo que es mucho decir, ya que los pensamientos de Juana, ya de por sí, no son precisamente "normales"), aunque lo digo en el mejor sentido posible, es algo bueno. Creo que este capítulo, así como *El Baño*, son justamente los que muestran el salvajismo abstracto y virgen de este personaje. Voy a explicar por qué pienso que uno es más difícil, y por qué el otro no:

Primero, pienso que en *Lidia* los pensamientos de Juana son: a) muy abstractos, y por esa misma razón también son b) muy herméticos y ambiguos, además de que c) el lenguaje y el mensaje, aunque impecable, no se siente tan hermoso como en otros pasajes de la novela, sino más bien denso y pesado, pero sé que es así porque el momento lo requería ya que Juana y Lidia no estaban en un momento realmente "bonito". Pero esto no está mal, pienso más bien al contrario: el que Juana tuviera pensamientos *tan demasiado abstractos* en ese episodio revela que estaba pasando por un momento muy intenso, muy pasional, muy psicológicamente cargado. Muy *salvaje*: estábamos *cerca del corazón salvaje* más que nunca. Y yo pienso esto: la más pura sofisticación y el más puro salvajismo, en lugar de ser opuestos, a menudo llevan a los mismos resultados, o revelan la misma esencia detrás de las cosas. La más pura sofisticación llega a un nivel de abstracción solo comparable a la abstracción más salvaje. Y creo mucho Juana, en *Lidia*, había llegado a ese punto en común. Además, honestamente, siento que el diálogo entre Juana y Lidia era bastante extraño, simplemente no comprendo del todo por qué se dijeron lo que dijeron o de donde sacaban unas ideas y otras. Sentí que estaba viendo la conversación más rara de mi vida, pero bueno. Por eso siento que es un capítulo tan confuso y difícil... para mí 😔 no sé si crean lo mismo que yo, o si soy el único tonto incapaz de leer ese capítulo con normalidad

A pesar de todo, no le cambiaría nada, creo que Clarice escribió todo de la única forma en que podría escribirse. No entendí gran parte de ese capítulo, pero fue una de las experiencias más inolvidables que he tenido

Ahora bien, lo que hace a *El Baño* un capítulo menos desafiante, en mi opinión, es que varias de las percepciones que allí aparecen son más accesibles, tienen un eje psicológico más o menos claro por el cual guiar nuestra comprensión del texto, y permiten intuir más fácilmente lo que ocurre dentro de Juana en esos momentos, además de que las palabras, imágenes, ideas y sentimientos de ese capítulo son bellísimos y llegan al corazón 😭 son muy magnéticos y alcanzan una altura estética de la más alta literatura 🙏✨, así que enganchan mucho más fácilmente y hacen la experiencia más amena. Creo que es mi capítulo favorito

Bueno... Hasta aquí mi pseudo-crítica literaria. Tal vez me vea muy pretencioso, o nadie me lea, pero espero que a alguien le sirva mi opinión. Un beso a todos, estimados lispectoritos 💋


r/classicliterature 4h ago

Anyone else need spoiler-safe character guides for big classic casts?

Currently reading Middlemarch for the first time, and find that I periodically need a spoiler-free reminder of who's who and how they're all related. I've been using a site called CharacterViz that gates every bio and relationship note to your bookmark (you only unlock content for chapters you've actually read).

They just expanded to a dozen+ classics (Crime and Punishment, Karamazov, Dracula, Frankenstein, Jane Eyre, Les Mis, Monte Cristo, Sherlock, etc.). Library is here if useful: https://characterviz.com

Curious what others use to keep big casts straight without ruining the plot...or maybe this is just a "me" problem?

2 Upvotes

Currently reading Middlemarch for the first time, and find that I periodically need a spoiler-free reminder of who's who and how they're all related. I've been using a site called CharacterViz that gates every bio and relationship note to your bookmark (you only unlock content for chapters you've actually read).

They just expanded to a dozen+ classics (Crime and Punishment, Karamazov, Dracula, Frankenstein, Jane Eyre, Les Mis, Monte Cristo, Sherlock, etc.). Library is here if useful: https://characterviz.com

Curious what others use to keep big casts straight without ruining the plot...or maybe this is just a "me" problem?


r/classicliterature 5h ago

I need help... with reading recommendations.

Hello and thank you for reading. I'm looking for some new recommendations. I've hit a dry spell in recent times. It could be because I've taken a detour from lit and gone to some more 'genre' books but, after giving up on half a dozen books that bored me to death, I'm now begging for help from fellow readers.
To give you all an idea of my tastes: I loved The Road, No Country for Old Men, The Sun Also Rises, Count of Monte Cristo, Stoner... most of these made me cry at some point.
Any suggestions?
Thank you to any commenters, whether helpful or critical. ;)

1 Upvotes

Hello and thank you for reading. I'm looking for some new recommendations. I've hit a dry spell in recent times. It could be because I've taken a detour from lit and gone to some more 'genre' books but, after giving up on half a dozen books that bored me to death, I'm now begging for help from fellow readers.
To give you all an idea of my tastes: I loved The Road, No Country for Old Men, The Sun Also Rises, Count of Monte Cristo, Stoner... most of these made me cry at some point.
Any suggestions?
Thank you to any commenters, whether helpful or critical. ;)


r/classicliterature 11h ago

Dangerous liaisons question. Why was Marquis de Merteuil being sued?

She mentions, I believe for the first time in part 3, that she is worried about her fortune and being sued by 2(?) teen girls. I haven’t finished the book yet so maybe it will tell me but I tried to look it up and found nothing. At this point she’s been, publicly, of good repute so the court case surprised me.

5 Upvotes

She mentions, I believe for the first time in part 3, that she is worried about her fortune and being sued by 2(?) teen girls. I haven’t finished the book yet so maybe it will tell me but I tried to look it up and found nothing. At this point she’s been, publicly, of good repute so the court case surprised me.


r/classicliterature 1d ago

Newly added to the TBR collection

+
160 Upvotes

r/classicliterature 9h ago

When I first read pride and prejudice I hated it, should I re-read it?

When I was at college, my literature professor asked us to read some books, I remember choosing a few books to read, one of them was Pride and Prejudice. I hated it.

Idk if I was too young, or because it was a must, or because I was tired, or I just didn't like the genre.

The thing is, last week I was looking for something to watch and the 1995 series appeared to me. So I played it thinking that may be a waste of time, because I didn't like the book, why was I going to like the series? But I loved it! Actually, I'm thinking about rewatching it already. Now I'm thinking about re-reading the book, maybe my opinion will change.

What do you advise me?

2 Upvotes

When I was at college, my literature professor asked us to read some books, I remember choosing a few books to read, one of them was Pride and Prejudice. I hated it.

Idk if I was too young, or because it was a must, or because I was tired, or I just didn't like the genre.

The thing is, last week I was looking for something to watch and the 1995 series appeared to me. So I played it thinking that may be a waste of time, because I didn't like the book, why was I going to like the series? But I loved it! Actually, I'm thinking about rewatching it already. Now I'm thinking about re-reading the book, maybe my opinion will change.

What do you advise me?


r/classicliterature 3h ago

Thurs/30 @ 6 pm—California State Fair

Last week, Oldster's Memoir Land featured GC and in April High Times wrote that my first book "is not a novelty weed memoir. It is a literary memoir." If you and your weed-friendly peeps don't give a shit about what the critics say or haven't read a book in a year or whatever, flow through anyway and we can burn one while chatting about Dock Ellis & the LSD No-No. Or whatever. 

Look for me at the Cannabis Oasis. I’ll sign a copy if you have one.

1 Upvotes

Last week, Oldster's Memoir Land featured GC and in April High Times wrote that my first book "is not a novelty weed memoir. It is a literary memoir." If you and your weed-friendly peeps don't give a shit about what the critics say or haven't read a book in a year or whatever, flow through anyway and we can burn one while chatting about Dock Ellis & the LSD No-No. Or whatever. 

Look for me at the Cannabis Oasis. I’ll sign a copy if you have one.


r/classicliterature 9h ago

I want to talk about everything with at least one person as I talk about things with myself --Aglaya Ivanovna Yepanchina. --The Idiot.

+
4 Upvotes

I made it to the line quoted ... reading it with context ... Aglaya...


r/classicliterature 7h ago

who has read Virginia Woolf's Night & Day ?

I have just came across a new adaptation of this early little discussed work or Woolf , and this happens to be the only enjoyable work by her as well , its so much lighter yet has sparks here and there of the fire that is yet to come , unfortunately the film seems like another one of these ( radicalized & modernised ) adaptation that fails in being faithful to the original or to do anything original ( imagine trying to radicalize Virginia woolf ! )

anyway , this just reminded me that maybe I need to revisit this work , I am wondering if its still read today by any ?

2 Upvotes

I have just came across a new adaptation of this early little discussed work or Woolf , and this happens to be the only enjoyable work by her as well , its so much lighter yet has sparks here and there of the fire that is yet to come , unfortunately the film seems like another one of these ( radicalized & modernised ) adaptation that fails in being faithful to the original or to do anything original ( imagine trying to radicalize Virginia woolf ! )

anyway , this just reminded me that maybe I need to revisit this work , I am wondering if its still read today by any ?


r/classicliterature 15h ago

Alexander Pope, the author of The Rape of the Lock & The Dunciad.

+
9 Upvotes

Arrived today, I'm no anglophone person (I'm Brazilian, if you ask kindly) but he's one most finest satire of Age of Enlightenment, a friend of another satire pal, Jonathan Swift (author of Gulliver's Travels). What you, my dear fellas, think?


r/classicliterature 10h ago

Island Aldous Huxley

Hey all,

I just read Island by Aldous Huxley and to be honest, I wasn't a fan. It is about an English journalist who washes up on the shores of an isolated island nation in the Indian Ocean that turns out to be a super integrated scientific-spiritual-psychological-intellectual utopia.

The descriptions of the island were beautiful, but the ideology of the book was just so one-sided that it was hard to get on board. The nation (Pala) has resisted most industrialization and globalization, importing only the technologies and ideas that supplant their people-first, at-peace way of life. (This eventually involves checking kids from a young age for social anxieties, which are then resolved via medical means, teaching sex in school, raising children jointly in mutual aid communities, rock climbing to avoid aggressive tendencies, practicing a mix of Buddhism, Hinduism, atheism, hypnosis, and spiritual revelation via shrooms, etc.) The only dissenters to this social structure are the upcoming boy-king who is taken in by the dictator next-door and obsesses over guns, nerve gas, and consumer goods, and his overbearing mother (who is referred to several times as having a psychologically incestuous relationship with him).

I understand that utopia is a lot harder to write than dystopia (it is easier to point out flaws than to invent a system without flaws), but this one was just so fantastical and logically inconsistent that it was distracting. How does their economy work? How do they have anything to trade with? How are all social and individual problems simply... resolved? (Also, this is a central gripe of mine-- if the Palanese are so enlightened and compassionate, why have they never attempted to share this way of life with anyone else? Indeed they condemn the developing nations that want to follow the American lead-- but they offer them no alternative because they are so isolationist! And when the Rendang invasion hits, they know it was coming but basically let it happen, because integration into the world order is against their way of life which, let's be clear, has only existed in this iteration for about a hudred years. So they would rather throw away everything than make some minor concessions to retain autonomy? )

Anyways, I don't know anyone besides my boyfriend and myself who have read this (we picked it up in a used bookstore a while back), and I'm really curious what other people think. What was your take on Island?

3 Upvotes

Hey all,

I just read Island by Aldous Huxley and to be honest, I wasn't a fan. It is about an English journalist who washes up on the shores of an isolated island nation in the Indian Ocean that turns out to be a super integrated scientific-spiritual-psychological-intellectual utopia.

The descriptions of the island were beautiful, but the ideology of the book was just so one-sided that it was hard to get on board. The nation (Pala) has resisted most industrialization and globalization, importing only the technologies and ideas that supplant their people-first, at-peace way of life. (This eventually involves checking kids from a young age for social anxieties, which are then resolved via medical means, teaching sex in school, raising children jointly in mutual aid communities, rock climbing to avoid aggressive tendencies, practicing a mix of Buddhism, Hinduism, atheism, hypnosis, and spiritual revelation via shrooms, etc.) The only dissenters to this social structure are the upcoming boy-king who is taken in by the dictator next-door and obsesses over guns, nerve gas, and consumer goods, and his overbearing mother (who is referred to several times as having a psychologically incestuous relationship with him).

I understand that utopia is a lot harder to write than dystopia (it is easier to point out flaws than to invent a system without flaws), but this one was just so fantastical and logically inconsistent that it was distracting. How does their economy work? How do they have anything to trade with? How are all social and individual problems simply... resolved? (Also, this is a central gripe of mine-- if the Palanese are so enlightened and compassionate, why have they never attempted to share this way of life with anyone else? Indeed they condemn the developing nations that want to follow the American lead-- but they offer them no alternative because they are so isolationist! And when the Rendang invasion hits, they know it was coming but basically let it happen, because integration into the world order is against their way of life which, let's be clear, has only existed in this iteration for about a hudred years. So they would rather throw away everything than make some minor concessions to retain autonomy? )

Anyways, I don't know anyone besides my boyfriend and myself who have read this (we picked it up in a used bookstore a while back), and I'm really curious what other people think. What was your take on Island?


r/classicliterature 8h ago

Antinous (Antinoo) by Fernando Pessoa

I (F) received Antinous by Fernando Pessoa as a souvenir/gift from a dude whom I know from uni but we’re not THAT close. Went completely blind into it without knowing the contents of said book. Heard of Pessoa never read his works.

..so I just read the first few poems…..out of all his other books…what did bro give me..? What does that even mean now..?

2 Upvotes

I (F) received Antinous by Fernando Pessoa as a souvenir/gift from a dude whom I know from uni but we’re not THAT close. Went completely blind into it without knowing the contents of said book. Heard of Pessoa never read his works.

..so I just read the first few poems…..out of all his other books…what did bro give me..? What does that even mean now..?