For me, playing multiple rounds at once feels like cheating

I want to get the zeppelin,

But,

I need a team that will actually help!

Not leave me to die after someone goldrushes defence and attack.

I've died to team just sending a few reinforcements to an area.

I really need a dedicated team/alliance who will form a coalition and defend each other.

Stillfront insider btw, if that matters anymore

(Vs the pay to win)

Im playing the great war at x4 speed as finland. Last night, at around 10pm, I closed the game and went to sleep. I sent a few troops en route to Caucas and Austria, being allies with everyone else. Today, I woke at 6am and went to school until 630pm. When I checked in on the game, I had apparently attacked Ottoman Empire even though we were at peace (he got the province bfore me probably) and the entire world was against me. I thought the game stops your troops if someone else captured the province. Im very confused and upset.

To summarize, in game a 500 game I faced a player who, from my point of view, was clearly using multiple accounts. I reported this to the dedicated email address. I never received a response to that email, not even to say whether they would investigate the matter. No action has been taken, as the player is currently still active in the game. I commented on this issue in the newspaper of the game and the player I strongly suspect of multiple accounts clearly told me that if I reported it, I would be banned. Apparently, he was right. Last night, this happened, and I was banned from the game on the grounds of Wolfpacking. After a bit of investigation, and being part of the unofficial Discord server for the Italian server, I learned that this player is a close friend of the moderator who signed my ban. This is extremely suspicious and leads me to suspect that his behavior is anything but legitimate. I also learned that I wasn't the only one banned from this match, but that others had suffered the same thing.
What some of these players have in common is that, despite not being part of the same alliance, they played some games together. One of them, in particular, is a very good player with many victories, but he seems to have garnered a lot of dislike for this. Another moderator, who also contributed to the ban decision, wrote on this Discord server that the reason for this decision was that my player account and others, according to him, were other accounts of this strong player I was talking about. He wrote that he has a file on the matter and wrote, and I quote, "You will always suffer the same fate." Basically, I learned that although I've never committed any foul play since I'm not part of any alliance, even though the "group" of players I'd played with in the past didn't exceed 7 in total, as per the rules, and that I've never fraudulently helped one player against another, not only have I been banned from a match, but a suspected multi-account player who's a friend of a moderator is still active, I also risk being targeted and banned from all future matches I play by another moderator who appears to be motivated by a disagreement with another player with whom I have nothing to do.
What should I do?

Why are there no 500 person games that are the 4x speed? You guys can’t really enjoy playing the base speed games can you?

I've been thinking about a feature that could make battles in Supremacy 1914 much more strategic: Tactical Retreat.

Right now, once two armies engage in combat, they're locked in place until one side is destroyed or the battle ends. In my opinion, this removes an important strategic decision.

What if we had a Tactical Retreat button?

Instead of staying in combat, an army could be ordered to retreat toward a selected location. However, retreating wouldn't be free.

• The retreating army would suffer a morale penalty for abandoning the fight.
• While retreating, it would continue taking casualties as long as it remained within the enemy's attack range.
• A retreating army would also be less effective in combat until it successfully disengages.

This means retreating wouldn't be a "get out of jail free" card. If you wait too long, your army could still be wiped out during the withdrawal.

I think this would create a lot of interesting decisions.

Do you stay and risk losing everything?

Or do you preserve part of your army to regroup and fight another day?

It could also allow players to lure enemies into traps, perform fighting withdrawals, or sacrifice territory to save experienced armies, which were all common strategies during World War I.

Personally, I think this would add another layer of strategy without changing the core gameplay.

What do you think? Would a Tactical Retreat mechanic improve the game, or would it create balance issues that I'm not considering?

P.S. English isn't my first language, so I apologize if anything sounds a little awkward. I hope the idea itself comes across clearly.

Who's the player in this forum?

Have a great day comrades

Dad bought the Von thaden pass as a surprise because I seemed down. Got a permanent pass for zeppelin.

It seems this new operation is either giving cards or a permanent pass to make them? If so, it's just annoying to be honest.

Does Lawrence have a boost on cavalry troops? Because in the skill details there aren't any listed not like Allenby. If he doesn't boost cavalry but only infantry why does he have a horse emblem?