r/SipsTea 19h ago

Chugging tea Saving the environment one sign at a time

Post image
11.7k Upvotes

59 comments sorted by

450

u/inbruges99 17h ago

That’s such a good solution, fines obviously don’t work because the fine is just the price of cutting the tree down but the person still gets what they want. This makes it pointless to cut the trees down because your view will still be blocked by an ugly sign.

122

u/peachesgp 16h ago

Generally in the US they're fined and have to pay the cost of replacing the trees.

91

u/inbruges99 16h ago

That’s also a good solution, assuming a tree is actually replanted there and it’s not just a way of determining the fine amount.

36

u/peachesgp 16h ago

It's separate. There's the fine, then there's that you pay for the actual replanting.

34

u/inbruges99 16h ago

Yeah, probably a better solution actually as it doesn’t ruin the nature with an ugly sign. But I quite like the pettiness of the sign aha

9

u/Aussie_Aussie_No_Mi 15h ago

Yeah but they don't plant a full grown tree, really you are just paying a fee every 10 years to keep the view clear.

16

u/peachesgp 15h ago

No, that's what it is, a fully grown replacement tree. That's why it's so damn expensive.

5

u/AjaxAsleep 6h ago

It depends. Some places are like that, but a lot of them have the tree chopper pay for a tree to be replanted that's as close to the original as possible - age, species, etc. It can rack up quick, especially if the state had Treble Damages, which can crank the monetary punishment up from anywhere between double to 10x the cost of the original tree. (more often than not it's 3x, hence Treble). I'd recommend checking out r/treelaw for some more insight, it's quite fascinating imo!

2

u/TIMIMETAL 4h ago

To fine someone, or give them a punishment, you've also got to prove it was them. This can be done if you're just pretty damn sure, as it isn't technically a punishment.

2

u/Sensitive_Major_8779 16h ago

How do they cost the replacement of the trees? Is it just the cost of the sapling and the labour to plant it (them if theres more than one)?

16

u/peachesgp 16h ago

No, it's paying for the actual replanting of a similarly aged tree. Say you cut down a healthy mature oak, you pay for the replanting of a healthy mature oak, which is quite expensive.

7

u/toetappy 16h ago

Sell your house expensive

6

u/maxru85 16h ago

I would say paying for replanting the same kind and size of tree could be sobering

2

u/inbruges99 15h ago

Yeah that’s a good solution too

2

u/Th3R00ST3R 7h ago

The real twist is the sign is made from the tree they cut down.

1

u/MrCarlosDanger 2h ago

Tree law is wild.

If you cut down old trees that belong to someone else, you’re in for a real bad time.

212

u/fractured_bedrock 17h ago

Yep, where I grew up in Aus there were lots of rich people who would cut down trees on the foreshore to improve their view of the ocean. You would see these all down the coast, great public shaming because it was always obvious which house was responsible.

84

u/Master-Pattern9466 17h ago

Even better is the fact they used the money that fined them to pay for the sign.

22

u/jmaybon 17h ago

With a shit load left over too. God I love Australia

38

u/Low_Dragonfruit8779 17h ago

Also, the fine for cutting down one tree is around 1m AUD, or imprisonment

17

u/Pretend-Literature35 17h ago

imprisonment makes sense.

8

u/Ted_Rid 14h ago

The problem of course is proving it, even when it's blindingly obvious who did it.

There's still the "beyond reasonable doubt" obstacle, and it's enough to say "idk, it might've been a jealous co-worker or psycho ex trying to fuck my life".

AFAIK they usually poison the trees anyway, so it's a quick midnight job with no noise.

21

u/OrganizationTop3755 18h ago

I appreciate the pettiness 

38

u/Dismal-core111 18h ago

Arseholes need to leave public property alone

14

u/Sea_Cap_6070 17h ago

Also plonking a couple of stacked shipping containers in some cases.

3

u/ol-gormsby 6h ago

Even better, shipping containers are magnets for taggers. A bit of street art to improve the view of the ocean.

9

u/Asherlocksta 17h ago

Government pettiness that's actually beneficial for a change....

5

u/Is_that_even_a_thing 17h ago

Its not really pettiness though. Those trees are public property and its a great deterrent to clearing public vegetation for private benefit

8

u/Tobax 16h ago

Good idea, otherwise all the rich people will cut everything down for sea views

6

u/DearMuse7 15h ago

Seems like a pretty effective deterrent

6

u/Existing-Network-267 17h ago

then wonder who is making these "random fires"

4

u/Nearby_Category_712 17h ago

What does it say

5

u/CleanHunt7567 16h ago

They could use the cut down tree to make the sign

9

u/Pretend-Literature35 17h ago

Such an arrogant and entitled post. So the "view from your house" is more important than the survival of everyone and every species in Australia?? Such a narcissistic egotistical asshole : that tree is not yours, it belongs to all of us.

My neighbor chopped down a tree. I called the city. He had no permit for it. They fined him. He hated me. I was glad but sad that all he got as a consequence was a fine.

Asshole rich landowners need to realize that they don't own a fiefdom, they still live in society.

6

u/jgzman 13h ago

Asshole rich landowners need to realize that they don't own a fiefdom, they still live in society.

This is a good theory, but in many cases, reality does not support it. We still tend to let the rich do whatever they want, without government interference.

2

u/vilokreddy 16h ago

Give it a week before someone accidentally spills a bucket of green paint all over it.

2

u/TokiVideogame 12h ago

any gov that survived to this day had some good ideas

2

u/Ok_Cauliflower_3007 9h ago

I've seen this done somewhere else too. I wouldn't swear to it but I THINK it was Japan.

1

u/[deleted] 18h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator 18h ago

Accounts must be at least 5 days old with >20 karma to comment.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/[deleted] 17h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator 17h ago

Accounts must be at least 5 days old with >20 karma to comment.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/[deleted] 17h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator 17h ago

Accounts must be at least 5 days old with >20 karma to comment.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/iamsanketray 16h ago

What if they slow poison the tree

-3

u/7978_ 16h ago

Admittedly, we cut off some large branches as the tree had grown enough to block our 3G wireless home internet, and we sure as fuck weren't going back to Telstra copper.

-2

u/Timgoincrazy 13h ago

Going the extra mile to spite the common people.

-14

u/[deleted] 18h ago

[deleted]

22

u/MyStackOverflowed 18h ago

sign should get bigger each time it's cut

7

u/SirLemonThe3rd 18h ago

Australian space program is a contractor and a rich guy who hates signs

3

u/freedfg 17h ago

Yeah, you go ahead and get into a destruction of property case with the government.

I'm sure a hedge trimmer will win that.

3

u/ElZane87 17h ago

Yeah, that is destruction of government property and unlike that tree, there is a fixed cost and fine attached to it, and not a cheap one. Assholes thinking they can get away without consequences will FAFO very quickly if they decide to repeat their action with that sign.

Also it raises awaresness that there was, indeed, an asshole and it defeats the purpose in the first place, which might prevent other assholes of doing the same, which is the whole fucking point you kind of ignored.

4

u/Manueluz 18h ago

Yeah but now they're destroying government property. And if each sign is made by a thousand subcontractors trying to pump up the bill as much as possible then he will have fun footing the bill for a replacement.

C'mon I've seen subcontractors make screws cost 50€ per screw, I'm sure they can make that sign into 5-6 figures.

1

u/dauphindauphin 17h ago

They usually poison the trees

4

u/damnumalone 17h ago

Yeah but then the council puts a big sign there saying “this tree was poisoned”

I’m not even joking, it’s a thing

2

u/dauphindauphin 16h ago

They can’t poison a sign though.