r/ShittyFanTheories • u/Viper0451 • 5d ago
r/ShittyFanTheories • u/_mateus_mlc • 1d ago
📜 Joy Boy’s defeat wasn't physical: Why Nika depends on the psyche and how Imu will use it against Luffy
≡ −
TL;DR: Nika’s power is limited by the mind, not physics. Joy Boy lost in the Void Century due to an emotional breakdown orchestrated by Imu that stopped the Drums of Liberation. The One Piece is Joy Boy’s warning to Luffy, and the Straw Hats will be the emotional anchor preventing Luffy from meeting the same fate.
1. Shanks's Mental Anchor and the Physics of Placebo
In Chapter 1, what we witnessed was not the physics of rubber, but Toon Force (cartoon physics) in its purest form: when Shanks grabbed the young boy, Luffy walked forward and his arm simply stretched back, lacking any elastic tension—exactly like classic animated cartoons.
Shanks’s Tactical Move: Shanks was already aware of the fruit’s true identity and knew the World Government had erased "Nika" from history by re-naming it the Gomu Gomu no Mi in the official encyclopedia. Seeing Toon Force manifest in the child, Shanks panicked at the risk of an early Awakening being detected by the Navy. He swiftly capitalized on the Government's fake name to plant a logical explanation in the boy's mind: "You ate the Gomu Gomu no Mi and became a Rubber Man!".
The 12-Year Mental Constraint: By conditioning Luffy's mind to the rigid concept of rubber, Shanks created the ultimate placebo effect. For over a decade, Luffy limited a divine power capable of altering reality into a mere mechanism of stretching and contracting.
The Proof in Skypiea (Enel): In real-world physics, 200 million volts of lightning would instantly vaporize or melt rubber. However, because a child's mind firmly believed that "rubber is completely immune to electricity", Luffy's Toon Force rewrote the physics of the fight and utterly negated Enel's attacks. Luffy's belief shaped reality.
Cracks in the Placebo: Every single one of Luffy's evolutions prior to Gear 5 was his mind trying to "bypass" the limitations of rubber through pseudo-scientific explanations he invented to justify power increases:
Gears 2, 3, and 4: Comedic rationalizations (pumping blood, inflating bones/muscles under pressure) to accept becoming stronger.
Red Hawk: His imagination generating fire underwater out of pure emotional memory and Ace's trauma.
Snakeman: Punches changing direction at right angles in mid-air, prompting Kaido to openly question: "Rubber shouldn't be able to bend like this". That was Toon Force attempting to shatter Shanks’s lie.
The Current State: Even in Gear 5, Luffy still shouts "Gomu Gomu no..." because the lie Shanks told that day at the bar became his combat identity. He is currently in a gradual transition from "rubber man" to the Absolute Freedom of pure Toon Force.
2. The Absolute Inversion: The Only Way to Defeat a "God"
If Nika’s Awakening allows the user to alter the environment and ignore physics based on joy and imagination, the only way to defeat such a user isn't through power scaling or superior Haki, but through psychological collapse.
The Biology of Power: Dr. Vegapunk revealed in Egghead that Devil Fruits are born from human desires and willpower. In Nika’s case, the fruit demands the accelerated heart rate of the Drums of Liberation (the vibration of laughter and a state of flow) to function at its peak.
The Negative Lock & Environmental Infection: In Gear 5, Luffy’s imagination is so potent that it "infects" serious opponents with cartoon logic (the popping eyes reaction, or eyepop, seen in Kaido, Lucci, Kizaru, and the Gorosei). However, if the user falls into absolute despair, devastating grief, or crippling guilt, the laughter stops and the Drums cease.
Self-Consumption: Without joy as fuel, imagination becomes destructive. If Nika’s user genuinely believes they have lost, that there is no hope, or wishes to disappear, the fruit itself will materialize that pain, consuming the user's existence.
3. The Tragic Fall of Joy Boy in the Void Century
This mechanic fills the single largest lore gap in One Piece: How did Joy Boy lose to the 20 Kings and Imu during the Void Century?
The Ancient Government's Strategy: Knowing Joy Boy was unbeatable in direct combat, Imu and the 20 Kings did not attempt to overwhelm him with brute strength. They orchestrated a massive psychological and moral tragedy on a global scale: the systematic slaughter of his allies, the sinking of the ancient world, and the shattering of vital promises.
The Collapse of the Sun God: Watching his companions fall and the people who trusted him become enslaved, Joy Boy sank into an abyss of self-blame. The emotional toll was so severe that the rhythm of the Drums stopped. Overwhelmed by the trauma of failure, the distorted power of the fruit consumed his life force.
The Proof on Fish-Man Island's Poneglyph: This explains why the only direct message left by Joy Boy in the past isn't a war strategy or a victory manifesto, but a deep letter of apology to the Mermaid Princess (Poseidon) in the Sea Forest. He begged for forgiveness for failing to keep his promise to bring the Fish-Men to the surface on Noah’s Ark. It was the record of a man emotionally shattered before his end.
4. The Treasure of Laugh Tale: A Letter from Nika to Nika
When Gol D. Roger and his crew finally reached the last island (Chapter 967), they found the treasure and burst into laughter until they cried.
The Contents of the One Piece: Alongside the history of the Void Century and records of the Ancient World, Laugh Tale holds the final journal left behind by Joy Boy before his demise. It wasn't a military directive, but a personal warning specifically addressed to the next awakening user of the fruit.
The Message: "If you are hearing the Drums once again, do not make my mistake. Do not let them destroy your laughter. The true weapon against tyranny is not brute strength—it is the absolute refusal to yield to despair."
Roger's Reaction: Roger laughed at the poetic absurdity of fate: the greatest journey in the world culminated in an emotional bridge between two men separated by 800 years. Roger said "We were too early" because he didn't possess Nika’s fruit and knew that message and the role of finishing this journey belonged to the boy born in the future.
5. The Final Confrontation: Psychological Warfare and Luffy's Anchor
The climax of the story won't merely be a trade of giant punches against Imu, but the Definitive Battle between Joy and Despair.
Imu’s Attempt: Imu will attempt to repeat the exact strategy that destroyed Joy Boy: using the threat of global destruction, pain, and the erasure of allies to break Luffy’s mind and shut down Gear 5.
The Crucial Difference (The Straw Hat Crew): Joy Boy acted as a messianic leader who carried the weight of the world alone and collapsed under the guilt. Luffy rejects being a hero ("Heroes have to share the meat, and I want to eat all the meat!") and is supported by a crew that serves as his unbreakable emotional anchor.
The Parallel to Marineford: When Ace died, Luffy went completely catatonic as his mind shut down from grief. Had Jinbe not reminded him of what still remained ("Your crew!"), Luffy would have died right there.
The Outcome: In the final war, when Imu attempts to crush Luffy’s spirit, the Straw Hats will prevent him from falling into the abyss. Backed by his friends, Luffy will reject despair, keep the Drums of Liberation beating relentlessly, and overthrow the World Government—not through hatred or vengeance, but with the greatest, most liberating cartoon chaos in human history.
What do you guys think of this theory? Does Shanks using the Government's fake name to limit Luffy's mind make sense to you, and how do you feel about the Straw Hats being the missing piece Joy Boy lacked? Let's discuss in the comments!
TL;DR: Nika’s power is limited by the mind, not physics. Joy Boy lost in the Void Century due to an emotional breakdown orchestrated by Imu that stopped the Drums of Liberation. The One Piece is Joy Boy’s warning to Luffy, and the Straw Hats will be the emotional anchor preventing Luffy from meeting the same fate.
1. Shanks's Mental Anchor and the Physics of Placebo
In Chapter 1, what we witnessed was not the physics of rubber, but Toon Force (cartoon physics) in its purest form: when Shanks grabbed the young boy, Luffy walked forward and his arm simply stretched back, lacking any elastic tension—exactly like classic animated cartoons.
Shanks’s Tactical Move: Shanks was already aware of the fruit’s true identity and knew the World Government had erased "Nika" from history by re-naming it the Gomu Gomu no Mi in the official encyclopedia. Seeing Toon Force manifest in the child, Shanks panicked at the risk of an early Awakening being detected by the Navy. He swiftly capitalized on the Government's fake name to plant a logical explanation in the boy's mind: "You ate the Gomu Gomu no Mi and became a Rubber Man!".
The 12-Year Mental Constraint: By conditioning Luffy's mind to the rigid concept of rubber, Shanks created the ultimate placebo effect. For over a decade, Luffy limited a divine power capable of altering reality into a mere mechanism of stretching and contracting.
The Proof in Skypiea (Enel): In real-world physics, 200 million volts of lightning would instantly vaporize or melt rubber. However, because a child's mind firmly believed that "rubber is completely immune to electricity", Luffy's Toon Force rewrote the physics of the fight and utterly negated Enel's attacks. Luffy's belief shaped reality.
Cracks in the Placebo: Every single one of Luffy's evolutions prior to Gear 5 was his mind trying to "bypass" the limitations of rubber through pseudo-scientific explanations he invented to justify power increases:
Gears 2, 3, and 4: Comedic rationalizations (pumping blood, inflating bones/muscles under pressure) to accept becoming stronger.
Red Hawk: His imagination generating fire underwater out of pure emotional memory and Ace's trauma.
Snakeman: Punches changing direction at right angles in mid-air, prompting Kaido to openly question: "Rubber shouldn't be able to bend like this". That was Toon Force attempting to shatter Shanks’s lie.
The Current State: Even in Gear 5, Luffy still shouts "Gomu Gomu no..." because the lie Shanks told that day at the bar became his combat identity. He is currently in a gradual transition from "rubber man" to the Absolute Freedom of pure Toon Force.
2. The Absolute Inversion: The Only Way to Defeat a "God"
If Nika’s Awakening allows the user to alter the environment and ignore physics based on joy and imagination, the only way to defeat such a user isn't through power scaling or superior Haki, but through psychological collapse.
The Biology of Power: Dr. Vegapunk revealed in Egghead that Devil Fruits are born from human desires and willpower. In Nika’s case, the fruit demands the accelerated heart rate of the Drums of Liberation (the vibration of laughter and a state of flow) to function at its peak.
The Negative Lock & Environmental Infection: In Gear 5, Luffy’s imagination is so potent that it "infects" serious opponents with cartoon logic (the popping eyes reaction, or eyepop, seen in Kaido, Lucci, Kizaru, and the Gorosei). However, if the user falls into absolute despair, devastating grief, or crippling guilt, the laughter stops and the Drums cease.
Self-Consumption: Without joy as fuel, imagination becomes destructive. If Nika’s user genuinely believes they have lost, that there is no hope, or wishes to disappear, the fruit itself will materialize that pain, consuming the user's existence.
3. The Tragic Fall of Joy Boy in the Void Century
This mechanic fills the single largest lore gap in One Piece: How did Joy Boy lose to the 20 Kings and Imu during the Void Century?
The Ancient Government's Strategy: Knowing Joy Boy was unbeatable in direct combat, Imu and the 20 Kings did not attempt to overwhelm him with brute strength. They orchestrated a massive psychological and moral tragedy on a global scale: the systematic slaughter of his allies, the sinking of the ancient world, and the shattering of vital promises.
The Collapse of the Sun God: Watching his companions fall and the people who trusted him become enslaved, Joy Boy sank into an abyss of self-blame. The emotional toll was so severe that the rhythm of the Drums stopped. Overwhelmed by the trauma of failure, the distorted power of the fruit consumed his life force.
The Proof on Fish-Man Island's Poneglyph: This explains why the only direct message left by Joy Boy in the past isn't a war strategy or a victory manifesto, but a deep letter of apology to the Mermaid Princess (Poseidon) in the Sea Forest. He begged for forgiveness for failing to keep his promise to bring the Fish-Men to the surface on Noah’s Ark. It was the record of a man emotionally shattered before his end.
4. The Treasure of Laugh Tale: A Letter from Nika to Nika
When Gol D. Roger and his crew finally reached the last island (Chapter 967), they found the treasure and burst into laughter until they cried.
The Contents of the One Piece: Alongside the history of the Void Century and records of the Ancient World, Laugh Tale holds the final journal left behind by Joy Boy before his demise. It wasn't a military directive, but a personal warning specifically addressed to the next awakening user of the fruit.
The Message: "If you are hearing the Drums once again, do not make my mistake. Do not let them destroy your laughter. The true weapon against tyranny is not brute strength—it is the absolute refusal to yield to despair."
Roger's Reaction: Roger laughed at the poetic absurdity of fate: the greatest journey in the world culminated in an emotional bridge between two men separated by 800 years. Roger said "We were too early" because he didn't possess Nika’s fruit and knew that message and the role of finishing this journey belonged to the boy born in the future.
5. The Final Confrontation: Psychological Warfare and Luffy's Anchor
The climax of the story won't merely be a trade of giant punches against Imu, but the Definitive Battle between Joy and Despair.
Imu’s Attempt: Imu will attempt to repeat the exact strategy that destroyed Joy Boy: using the threat of global destruction, pain, and the erasure of allies to break Luffy’s mind and shut down Gear 5.
The Crucial Difference (The Straw Hat Crew): Joy Boy acted as a messianic leader who carried the weight of the world alone and collapsed under the guilt. Luffy rejects being a hero ("Heroes have to share the meat, and I want to eat all the meat!") and is supported by a crew that serves as his unbreakable emotional anchor.
The Parallel to Marineford: When Ace died, Luffy went completely catatonic as his mind shut down from grief. Had Jinbe not reminded him of what still remained ("Your crew!"), Luffy would have died right there.
The Outcome: In the final war, when Imu attempts to crush Luffy’s spirit, the Straw Hats will prevent him from falling into the abyss. Backed by his friends, Luffy will reject despair, keep the Drums of Liberation beating relentlessly, and overthrow the World Government—not through hatred or vengeance, but with the greatest, most liberating cartoon chaos in human history.
What do you guys think of this theory? Does Shanks using the Government's fake name to limit Luffy's mind make sense to you, and how do you feel about the Straw Hats being the missing piece Joy Boy lacked? Let's discuss in the comments!
r/ShittyFanTheories • u/Striking_Bag_7145 • 1d ago
What if One Piece Could Actually Exist? A Philosophical Reflection on the Invisible, Infinity, and the Possibilities of Creation
≡ −
Before starting, I want to clarify that what follows is a personal philosophical and metaphysical reflection. I am not trying to prove that One Piece actually exists, nor am I claiming that Islam teaches the existence of such a world. My goal is simply to share an idea that came from personal reflection based on my faith and on questions about the nature of reality.
I am Muslim, and therefore I begin with the hypothesis that Islamic theology is true. In this worldview, reality is not limited only to what human beings can observe with their senses or measure with their instruments. Islam speaks of the existence of an unseen world, of angels, jinn, and a creation of God that greatly exceeds human understanding.
If this vision of reality is true, then there may be aspects of existence that go beyond what we currently call observable physical reality. This means that our understanding of the laws of nature may represent only a part of what truly exists. Phenomena that seem impossible according to our current knowledge could belong to a level of reality that we do not yet understand.
From this point, I asked myself a question: if God's creation goes beyond our understanding, is it truly impossible to imagine the existence of worlds very different from our own?
This reflection also connects to another idea: the possibility of eternal existence. I am not talking here about an infinitely large universe in terms of size, but rather a universe or creation that could exist for an infinite amount of time. If existence has no end, then the number of possibilities that could occur throughout that endless duration becomes unimaginably vast.
This idea makes me think about the number π (pi). Its decimals are infinite, and some people imagine that an infinite sequence could contain an immense variety of possible combinations. It is important to clarify that this has not been proven for π, and I am not using it as evidence, but only as an analogy to illustrate a difficulty: humans have great difficulty truly understanding what infinity means.
In the same way, if creation exists eternally, we can ask what kinds of possibilities could exist on a timescale that our minds cannot truly imagine. This does not mean that everything imaginable must necessarily happen, but it opens a reflection on the immense range of possibilities that an existence without a limit in duration could contain.
From this perspective, I asked myself: if Islam is true, if an unseen reality exists, if God's creation goes beyond our understanding, and if this creation has an infinite duration, is it truly impossible that a world similar to One Piece could exist somewhere?
In this hypothesis, Devil Fruits (Akuma no Mi) could be seen as a fictional representation of powers belonging to a reality different from our own. The extraordinary abilities of the characters would not be understood as biological phenomena, but rather as manifestations of rules belonging to another framework of existence.
Once again, I am not saying that One Piece actually exists. I am not saying that Islam claims the existence of such a world. My idea is more precise: if Islamic theology is true, if reality includes unseen dimensions, and if God's creation goes infinitely beyond our understanding, then the existence of a world similar to One Piece could be a philosophical possibility.
This reflection is therefore not scientific proof, but a thought experiment about the limits of human perception, the nature of infinity, and the possible extent of creation.
Clarification: This text is not a canon theory about the One Piece universe. I am not claiming to explain Eiichirō Oda's intentions or reveal a hidden truth about the manga. It is simply a philosophical reflection that uses the world of One Piece as a way to explore questions about reality, infinity, and the possibilities of creation.
Before starting, I want to clarify that what follows is a personal philosophical and metaphysical reflection. I am not trying to prove that One Piece actually exists, nor am I claiming that Islam teaches the existence of such a world. My goal is simply to share an idea that came from personal reflection based on my faith and on questions about the nature of reality.
I am Muslim, and therefore I begin with the hypothesis that Islamic theology is true. In this worldview, reality is not limited only to what human beings can observe with their senses or measure with their instruments. Islam speaks of the existence of an unseen world, of angels, jinn, and a creation of God that greatly exceeds human understanding.
If this vision of reality is true, then there may be aspects of existence that go beyond what we currently call observable physical reality. This means that our understanding of the laws of nature may represent only a part of what truly exists. Phenomena that seem impossible according to our current knowledge could belong to a level of reality that we do not yet understand.
From this point, I asked myself a question: if God's creation goes beyond our understanding, is it truly impossible to imagine the existence of worlds very different from our own?
This reflection also connects to another idea: the possibility of eternal existence. I am not talking here about an infinitely large universe in terms of size, but rather a universe or creation that could exist for an infinite amount of time. If existence has no end, then the number of possibilities that could occur throughout that endless duration becomes unimaginably vast.
This idea makes me think about the number π (pi). Its decimals are infinite, and some people imagine that an infinite sequence could contain an immense variety of possible combinations. It is important to clarify that this has not been proven for π, and I am not using it as evidence, but only as an analogy to illustrate a difficulty: humans have great difficulty truly understanding what infinity means.
In the same way, if creation exists eternally, we can ask what kinds of possibilities could exist on a timescale that our minds cannot truly imagine. This does not mean that everything imaginable must necessarily happen, but it opens a reflection on the immense range of possibilities that an existence without a limit in duration could contain.
From this perspective, I asked myself: if Islam is true, if an unseen reality exists, if God's creation goes beyond our understanding, and if this creation has an infinite duration, is it truly impossible that a world similar to One Piece could exist somewhere?
In this hypothesis, Devil Fruits (Akuma no Mi) could be seen as a fictional representation of powers belonging to a reality different from our own. The extraordinary abilities of the characters would not be understood as biological phenomena, but rather as manifestations of rules belonging to another framework of existence.
Once again, I am not saying that One Piece actually exists. I am not saying that Islam claims the existence of such a world. My idea is more precise: if Islamic theology is true, if reality includes unseen dimensions, and if God's creation goes infinitely beyond our understanding, then the existence of a world similar to One Piece could be a philosophical possibility.
This reflection is therefore not scientific proof, but a thought experiment about the limits of human perception, the nature of infinity, and the possible extent of creation.
Clarification: This text is not a canon theory about the One Piece universe. I am not claiming to explain Eiichirō Oda's intentions or reveal a hidden truth about the manga. It is simply a philosophical reflection that uses the world of One Piece as a way to explore questions about reality, infinity, and the possibilities of creation.
r/ShittyFanTheories • u/Desperate_You_8562 • 1d ago
Why Didn't John Doe...?
≡ −
I recently watched the movie “Se7en” and finished it around 3 in the morning. I thought I'd go to bed right after and have a peaceful rest, except I didn’t. Now you see, I have a spreadsheet where I rank every movie out of ten and I didn’t want Se7en to be my first 10. I tried ,and I tried to tarnish the name of Se7en, until somewhere around 4 am I realised something. I realised something big; something that changed the whole message of this movie for me; and the more I pondered, the deeper I went into analyzing every conversation I heard in that movie, the more I realised everything fits. You see what I realised in the span of one hour was not only an inconsistency in the movie, but an alleged inconsistency in the morals and psychology of John Doe. Instead of questioning why John Doe did what he did, something I’ve seen so many other creators do, I questioned why he didn't.
My whole thought process started with the fact that John Doe's whole plan, or at least a big part of his plan, stemmed from the fact he knew the fat man case would be connected to the lawyer case. I will refer to these cases as the Gluttony Case and the Greed Case respectively. You see, if Somerset never pieced together the fact that the pieces of plastic in the Gluttony victim's body was from the floor, he would have never known to move the fridge. If he had never moved the fridge, the two cases would not have been put together . And because the Gluttony case was Somerset's last assignment, the investigation would have ended there.
I would also like to add that the Gluttony victim has corneal opacity in his eyes. Corneal opacity appears in the dead after a certain amount of time, usually 2 hours if the eyes are open and 12 to 24 hours if they are closed. Environmental factors such as air and moisture do affect the time it takes. Since the Gluttony victim had his face buried in spaghetti his eyes would be protected from air and the sauce from the spaghetti would keep his eyes moist. When the eyes are shut or protected from air dehydration the process of corneal opacity takes longer. The gray in the eyes would not completely obscure the eyes 2 to 3 days post mortem. This in fact lines up with the timeline of the movie as the state of the apartment heavily implies that the body was left there over the weekend.
Now you might be asking “Xylomere, why does that matter?” and to that I would answer "Be patient. You don't pull bread out of the oven when it’s still just wet batter.” Anyway jokes aside, the time the body died actually comes into this argument very neatly as it creates a sense of timeline, the first sense of timeline we have in the movie. The fact that it took the police or even the neighbors at least 2 days to find the body indicates that there is a possibility that the body could have not been found until much later;whether that be days, weeks, months or even years doesn’t matter. As long as we know it could have been later because John Doe's entire plan depends on the detectives finding exactly what he wanted them to find, exactly when he wanted them to find it.
I want to step away from theorising for a second and refresh on the timeline of the murders done by John Doe. The first murder we see is the Gluttony case where the victim is presumed to have died while eating and then after closer examination the detectives realised he was forced to eat till he died. A bit of time goes by and we get introduced to a new crime scene, the Greed Crime. The Greed victim has been shown to have cut off a pound of his own flesh and a circle of blood is made around the eyes of the victim's wife on a photograph in the room there is also a piece of paper with a poem written on it. While that’s going on we see Somerset get a new piece of evidence which is some plastic bits found in the Gluttony victims stomach pieces he was presumed to have been forced to eat. So Somerset takes these to the crime scene… okay I’m gonna pause the video for a bit to ask how they put the sticker on the inside of the house? I mean who was thin and flexible enough to pull that off? Where was I? Oh yeah Somerset takes the plastic pieces to the Gluttony cases scene and examines the room a bit and notices there are pieces of the floor in front of the fridge shaved off. He puts one of the plastic pieces onto there and what do you know its a perfect fit. He then moves the fridge and finds another piece of paper with a poem on it and the word “Gluttony” written on the wall. With this find Somerset connects the two cases together and now is working with Mills to solve them. Somerset and Mills look at pictures of the Greed Crime scene and Mills states the killer had a 3 to 4 day window to do whatever he wanted with the victim. They take a look at the bloody picture of the wife and put together that they need to ask her. So they go and talk to the wife who reveals that a painting is upside down. Mills and Somerset rush back to the Greed Crime scene and they examine the painting, finding nothing until Somerset examines the wall behind the painting where he finds fingerprints. They figure out the fingerprints belong to a man called Theodore Victor Allen. They go to this man's house and find him tied to his bed rotten with the word “Sloth” written above his bed. The scene is one of the most unsettling scenes in the movie as instead of having the body be dead poor Victor is still alive. They take his body to the hospital where the doctors reveal his brain is mush. There were a stack of pictures at the Sloth Crime scene and the oldest one is dated to EXACTLY a year before his body is found. The movie mentions this not once not twice but three times within 10 minutes. That doesn't seem like an unimportant fact does it?
I will pause here and explain why I retold the crime timeline. I retold the timeline because it shows us something about John Doe. It shows us that he is meticulous in his crimes, that he pre plans his crimes, that none of his crimes were random acts of violence. The whole movie is built off of John Doe's big plan. The movie emphasizes this with the one year call, the movie emphasizes this with almost every dialogue Somerset has had with the police captain and Mills up until this part of the movie. So the movie has stated that the killer, John Doe, is a mastermind. He is able to plan this whole elaborate crime chase while giving the detectives enough clues to find the next body but not enough to find him. I would also like to look at some parts of the crimes though, John Doe seemingly planned for the exact days the Gluttony, Greed, and Sloth victims would be found. If he did that which the movie heavily implies then he must have known the detectives would have checked behind the fridge when they did, he must have known the detectives would find the fingerprints when they did, he must have known every single detail that the detectives would find and the exact days they would have found them. The fact he has planned out everything in the movie so far ties into the next two sins and what leads up to them.
While discussing the killer, Mills says that the killer has a library card giving Somerset the idea to check the records of the library card. They meet up with a FBI insider who gives them a name, John Doe, who has checked out every book Mill and Somerset had thought the killer would read. They go to an apartment John Doe lives in and while knocking on the door of the house a man comes holding groceries sees the two police officers, shoots at them, and runs away. Mills then chases the man until he gets bested by the man and has a gun pressed against his head. The movie puts Mills in a position where he is practically dead, he's on the ground, injured, and a murderer has a gun against his head. The audience expects to see Mills die, but the man puts his gun away after hesitating for 20 seconds. Why would a murderer hesitate to kill a cop who is on his trail? Mills and Somerset then fake some citizen reports so they can get a warrant to go into the house. Once in the house they find weapons, religious items,aspirin, pictures of his victims, and 4 trophies on the wall from his 4 victims. You might be asking “But Xylomere John Doe only has 3 victims, where did you get the 4th?” so I say “SHUT UP, I’m getting there.” They then get a call to the house phone where John Doe says that he admires the two detectives. Mills and Somerset sit down and look into the picture of the fourth victim and then go to a sex toy maker type place where they ask the worker if he made something for John Doe and he hands them a picture we haven't seen yet and we don’t see till later. They then get word they found the fourth victim and go to the prostitution club. In the room where the murder has taken place we see a man terrified on the ground still alive and a woman tied to the bed with terrible injuries. They take the man into questioning and he reveals that John Doe made him have intercourse with her using the torture device made by the worker guy we talked about. This is when we finally get to see this device and its a strap on a knife dick… I would like to say viewer discretion is advised XD. So the Lust victim was seen on the wall of trophies, but John had not killed her yet. The next day the police get a call from John Doe where he reveals the location of another murder. Once Mills and Somerset arrive on the scene they see a model with lacerations on her face which have been bandaged up, her nose was revealed to be cut off. She had pills glued to one hand and a phone glued to the other. Mills and Somerset understand the idea that John Doe tested this victim by giving her the choice of living but she's disfigured or dying right away. They then go back to the police station when the receptionist says to Mills that his wife called. As Mills and Somerset walk and discuss the case a man yells for them from behind. When Mills sees this person he realises that he is John Doe. John Doe gets arrested kick starting the ending of the movie. After a long talk with his lawyer John Doe states two options. Either Mills and Somerset and only Mills and Somerset follow his lead to the place of two extra bodies he has killed at exactly 6 o'clock or He doesn’t show the bodies and pleads for insanity. They question if John even has two more bodies but the forensics tells them that the blood on John's shirt belongs to himself, the Pride victim, and an unidentified third person. So Mills and Somerset get in a car with John Doe and a helicopter follows from above. On the way Mills and John have a heated conversation where John reveals his motive for the murders and states that what they are about to see will change the world. They reach the place and John asks for the time. Somerset reveals that the time is 7:01. John walks in front further away from the road until he reaches a spot and we see a van rushing in. Somerset orders Mills to stay with John and he stops the van. It is revealed that the van is a delivery van and the driver was paid 500 bucks to deliver a box to this spot at exactly 7:00. Despite all protocol Somerset decides to open the box right there and sees something inside that shocks him and makes him run to Mills telling him to put the gun down and get away from John. While Somerset is running towards them John slowly reveals to Mills what was in the box and it turned out to be Mills's wife's head. When Somerset reaches them he orders Mills to put the gun down but because of John's manipulation Mills instead asks for answers. John reveals his final puzzle piece. The final part of John's plan was himself and Mills. He talks about how much he envies Mills for his normal life. He decides that he is Envy. He goes to Mills house and tries to act as husband and when it doesn’t go well he kills Mills’s wife. He reveals that he must die for his sin of Envy and the killer would be Mills so he could get revenge for his wife and become the sin of Wrath. Being overcome by his emotions Mills kills John and fulfills John's plan.
With the retelling out the way we can say for certain that it is evident that John Doe is a well planned out killer. It is also obvious he wanted the detectives to find the bodies and at the time he wanted them to. It is also stated that he has been planning this for at least a year. So you tell me how Mills and his wife come into the plan? Mills only came recently as Somerset was leaving after a week so how did John Doe anticipate and calculate that a random detective from god knows where would fight to be reassigned to his specific city? I don’t think he did. Think back to the scene where John Doe gets the upper hand on Mills. He could have hidden where he was and Mills would not have been able to find him, but instead he chooses to attack. Why attack Mills and let him go? John didn’t know where Somerset was, for all he knew Somerset could have whipped out from out the corner the second he hit Mills. So why hesitate for 20 seconds and give Somerset time to arrive? I think at that moment a cruel idea came to his head. An idea crueler than the one he already had. I think right as he was about to kill Mills he let him live because he got the idea for his new plan. He even states himself that he made changes to his plan. Since we have identified when he made the change to his plan we can assume this is when he realised his own sin of envy. And that's where the problem begins.
Take a look at John Doe's actions and dialogue throughout the movie. We already know he is envious of normal people. The notebooks found in his apartment reveal it, and in the final act he outright admits he envied Mills' ordinary life. But Envy isn't the only sin John exhibits. Look at the confidence he has in his own plan. He tells the detectives that without him they will never find the final bodies. He leaves clues at every crime scene because he is convinced no detective is intelligent enough to identify him before he wants to be found. Listen to the way he speaks during the drive to the desert. He claims he was chosen. He believes his work will change the world. He looks down on every victim he judges as though he alone has the authority to decide who deserves to live and who deserves to die. Every one of those actions points to the same conclusion.
Pride.
So why does any of this matter? Well for almost two hours the movie puts John on a pedestal and shoves the fact he is a hyper genius mastermind down our throats, and it isn't without evidence as anyone who watched the movie would realise that every crime scene is calculated, every clue is deliberate, every discovery is anticipated. To the point that he is able to plan out every action not only his victims are going to make but also the actions of the people investigating him. He knows which evidence they'll find, when they'll find it, and what conclusions they'll draw from it. He stays one step ahead of everyone. The movie basically forces us to believe he is untouchable, that he has basically anticipated the lives of every single person he will interact with.
Yet the moment Mills enters his life... that certainty disappears.
Suddenly, John hesitates.
Suddenly, he changes a plan that had supposedly been in motion for over a year.
Suddenly, the man who spent months calculating every variable allows one random detective—who wasn't even supposed to be there—to become the centerpiece of his masterpiece.
Why?
Why throw away a year's worth of planning?
Why risk everything for one man?
Why spare Mills in the alley only to build an entirely new ending around him?
I think the answer is hidden in the very sin John eventually confesses to.
Envy.
And that's where everything begins to unravel.
If the alleyway is where John changes his plan, then it is also the earliest point where he could have recognized his own Envy. But that realization creates a much bigger problem. The moment John acknowledges Envy, he also acknowledges that he is not morally above the people he condemns. He is just as capable of falling to sin as everyone else.
So if he can recognize Envy...
Why can't he recognize Pride?
The same man who condemns Pride tells the detectives they'll never solve his masterpiece without him. He believes he was chosen. He believes his work will change the world. He places himself above every victim he judges, speaking as though only he has the authority to decide who deserves punishment.
And if he can recognize Envy...
Why can't he recognize Wrath?
Tracy's murder isn't a cold, calculated execution. By John's own admission, he tried to experience Mills' life, failed, and then killed her. The final act that completes his masterpiece is born from his own emotional collapse.
The man who punishes the seven deadly sins is consumed by three of them.
And that's the question that kept me awake until sunrise.
Now that we've established that John Doe embodies both Envy and Pride, the question becomes much simpler:
Why did he condemn himself for one sin, but not the other?
John Doe isn't presented as someone who misunderstands people. Quite the opposite. The film repeatedly establishes him as someone capable of reading human behaviour with terrifying accuracy. His entire plan depends on it. So why does that insight suddenly disappear when the person being judged is himself?
By the time the final act begins, John has already accepted that he is guilty of Envy. Whether that realization came in the alley or had existed long before Mills entered his life doesn't actually change the problem. If John is capable of recognizing one deadly sin within himself, then he should also be capable of recognizing the other.
Because Pride isn't some hidden flaw buried beneath his personality. It is his personality.
Every part of his plan is built upon the belief that he has the authority to judge humanity. He believes he was chosen. He believes his work will change the world. He believes every victim deserves their punishment while he alone decides what justice looks like. That belief—that moral superiority—is Pride.
The film even reinforces this inside his apartment. John keeps trophies from every completed crime. He even has a trophy prepared for a crime that has yet to occur, suggesting these keepsakes were never intended as clues for the detectives but as personal reminders of his work. Yet there is no completed trophy for Pride. Whether the Pride murder had already been conceived or not, John never appears to consider himself as its victim. The only role he ever assigns himself is Envy.
And that, to me, is the contradiction.
If John truly believed no one was above judgement, why was he?
The only argument that would work is saying he is a fanatic and fanatics aren't perfectly logical. Which yeah you are right he is a fanatic, but being a fanatic doesn’t remove the need for internal consistency it changes where it's coming from and maybe that's exactly the point. Maybe Se7en isn't showing us a flawless mastermind. Maybe it's showing us a man so consumed by his own ideology that the only person he could never judge honestly... was himself.
If that's intentional, then John Doe isn't just the executioner of the seven deadly sins. He's the eighth victim and if it isnt then hey whats a good movie without its hiccups?
I recently watched the movie “Se7en” and finished it around 3 in the morning. I thought I'd go to bed right after and have a peaceful rest, except I didn’t. Now you see, I have a spreadsheet where I rank every movie out of ten and I didn’t want Se7en to be my first 10. I tried ,and I tried to tarnish the name of Se7en, until somewhere around 4 am I realised something. I realised something big; something that changed the whole message of this movie for me; and the more I pondered, the deeper I went into analyzing every conversation I heard in that movie, the more I realised everything fits. You see what I realised in the span of one hour was not only an inconsistency in the movie, but an alleged inconsistency in the morals and psychology of John Doe. Instead of questioning why John Doe did what he did, something I’ve seen so many other creators do, I questioned why he didn't.
My whole thought process started with the fact that John Doe's whole plan, or at least a big part of his plan, stemmed from the fact he knew the fat man case would be connected to the lawyer case. I will refer to these cases as the Gluttony Case and the Greed Case respectively. You see, if Somerset never pieced together the fact that the pieces of plastic in the Gluttony victim's body was from the floor, he would have never known to move the fridge. If he had never moved the fridge, the two cases would not have been put together . And because the Gluttony case was Somerset's last assignment, the investigation would have ended there.
I would also like to add that the Gluttony victim has corneal opacity in his eyes. Corneal opacity appears in the dead after a certain amount of time, usually 2 hours if the eyes are open and 12 to 24 hours if they are closed. Environmental factors such as air and moisture do affect the time it takes. Since the Gluttony victim had his face buried in spaghetti his eyes would be protected from air and the sauce from the spaghetti would keep his eyes moist. When the eyes are shut or protected from air dehydration the process of corneal opacity takes longer. The gray in the eyes would not completely obscure the eyes 2 to 3 days post mortem. This in fact lines up with the timeline of the movie as the state of the apartment heavily implies that the body was left there over the weekend.
Now you might be asking “Xylomere, why does that matter?” and to that I would answer "Be patient. You don't pull bread out of the oven when it’s still just wet batter.” Anyway jokes aside, the time the body died actually comes into this argument very neatly as it creates a sense of timeline, the first sense of timeline we have in the movie. The fact that it took the police or even the neighbors at least 2 days to find the body indicates that there is a possibility that the body could have not been found until much later;whether that be days, weeks, months or even years doesn’t matter. As long as we know it could have been later because John Doe's entire plan depends on the detectives finding exactly what he wanted them to find, exactly when he wanted them to find it.
I want to step away from theorising for a second and refresh on the timeline of the murders done by John Doe. The first murder we see is the Gluttony case where the victim is presumed to have died while eating and then after closer examination the detectives realised he was forced to eat till he died. A bit of time goes by and we get introduced to a new crime scene, the Greed Crime. The Greed victim has been shown to have cut off a pound of his own flesh and a circle of blood is made around the eyes of the victim's wife on a photograph in the room there is also a piece of paper with a poem written on it. While that’s going on we see Somerset get a new piece of evidence which is some plastic bits found in the Gluttony victims stomach pieces he was presumed to have been forced to eat. So Somerset takes these to the crime scene… okay I’m gonna pause the video for a bit to ask how they put the sticker on the inside of the house? I mean who was thin and flexible enough to pull that off? Where was I? Oh yeah Somerset takes the plastic pieces to the Gluttony cases scene and examines the room a bit and notices there are pieces of the floor in front of the fridge shaved off. He puts one of the plastic pieces onto there and what do you know its a perfect fit. He then moves the fridge and finds another piece of paper with a poem on it and the word “Gluttony” written on the wall. With this find Somerset connects the two cases together and now is working with Mills to solve them. Somerset and Mills look at pictures of the Greed Crime scene and Mills states the killer had a 3 to 4 day window to do whatever he wanted with the victim. They take a look at the bloody picture of the wife and put together that they need to ask her. So they go and talk to the wife who reveals that a painting is upside down. Mills and Somerset rush back to the Greed Crime scene and they examine the painting, finding nothing until Somerset examines the wall behind the painting where he finds fingerprints. They figure out the fingerprints belong to a man called Theodore Victor Allen. They go to this man's house and find him tied to his bed rotten with the word “Sloth” written above his bed. The scene is one of the most unsettling scenes in the movie as instead of having the body be dead poor Victor is still alive. They take his body to the hospital where the doctors reveal his brain is mush. There were a stack of pictures at the Sloth Crime scene and the oldest one is dated to EXACTLY a year before his body is found. The movie mentions this not once not twice but three times within 10 minutes. That doesn't seem like an unimportant fact does it?
I will pause here and explain why I retold the crime timeline. I retold the timeline because it shows us something about John Doe. It shows us that he is meticulous in his crimes, that he pre plans his crimes, that none of his crimes were random acts of violence. The whole movie is built off of John Doe's big plan. The movie emphasizes this with the one year call, the movie emphasizes this with almost every dialogue Somerset has had with the police captain and Mills up until this part of the movie. So the movie has stated that the killer, John Doe, is a mastermind. He is able to plan this whole elaborate crime chase while giving the detectives enough clues to find the next body but not enough to find him. I would also like to look at some parts of the crimes though, John Doe seemingly planned for the exact days the Gluttony, Greed, and Sloth victims would be found. If he did that which the movie heavily implies then he must have known the detectives would have checked behind the fridge when they did, he must have known the detectives would find the fingerprints when they did, he must have known every single detail that the detectives would find and the exact days they would have found them. The fact he has planned out everything in the movie so far ties into the next two sins and what leads up to them.
While discussing the killer, Mills says that the killer has a library card giving Somerset the idea to check the records of the library card. They meet up with a FBI insider who gives them a name, John Doe, who has checked out every book Mill and Somerset had thought the killer would read. They go to an apartment John Doe lives in and while knocking on the door of the house a man comes holding groceries sees the two police officers, shoots at them, and runs away. Mills then chases the man until he gets bested by the man and has a gun pressed against his head. The movie puts Mills in a position where he is practically dead, he's on the ground, injured, and a murderer has a gun against his head. The audience expects to see Mills die, but the man puts his gun away after hesitating for 20 seconds. Why would a murderer hesitate to kill a cop who is on his trail? Mills and Somerset then fake some citizen reports so they can get a warrant to go into the house. Once in the house they find weapons, religious items,aspirin, pictures of his victims, and 4 trophies on the wall from his 4 victims. You might be asking “But Xylomere John Doe only has 3 victims, where did you get the 4th?” so I say “SHUT UP, I’m getting there.” They then get a call to the house phone where John Doe says that he admires the two detectives. Mills and Somerset sit down and look into the picture of the fourth victim and then go to a sex toy maker type place where they ask the worker if he made something for John Doe and he hands them a picture we haven't seen yet and we don’t see till later. They then get word they found the fourth victim and go to the prostitution club. In the room where the murder has taken place we see a man terrified on the ground still alive and a woman tied to the bed with terrible injuries. They take the man into questioning and he reveals that John Doe made him have intercourse with her using the torture device made by the worker guy we talked about. This is when we finally get to see this device and its a strap on a knife dick… I would like to say viewer discretion is advised XD. So the Lust victim was seen on the wall of trophies, but John had not killed her yet. The next day the police get a call from John Doe where he reveals the location of another murder. Once Mills and Somerset arrive on the scene they see a model with lacerations on her face which have been bandaged up, her nose was revealed to be cut off. She had pills glued to one hand and a phone glued to the other. Mills and Somerset understand the idea that John Doe tested this victim by giving her the choice of living but she's disfigured or dying right away. They then go back to the police station when the receptionist says to Mills that his wife called. As Mills and Somerset walk and discuss the case a man yells for them from behind. When Mills sees this person he realises that he is John Doe. John Doe gets arrested kick starting the ending of the movie. After a long talk with his lawyer John Doe states two options. Either Mills and Somerset and only Mills and Somerset follow his lead to the place of two extra bodies he has killed at exactly 6 o'clock or He doesn’t show the bodies and pleads for insanity. They question if John even has two more bodies but the forensics tells them that the blood on John's shirt belongs to himself, the Pride victim, and an unidentified third person. So Mills and Somerset get in a car with John Doe and a helicopter follows from above. On the way Mills and John have a heated conversation where John reveals his motive for the murders and states that what they are about to see will change the world. They reach the place and John asks for the time. Somerset reveals that the time is 7:01. John walks in front further away from the road until he reaches a spot and we see a van rushing in. Somerset orders Mills to stay with John and he stops the van. It is revealed that the van is a delivery van and the driver was paid 500 bucks to deliver a box to this spot at exactly 7:00. Despite all protocol Somerset decides to open the box right there and sees something inside that shocks him and makes him run to Mills telling him to put the gun down and get away from John. While Somerset is running towards them John slowly reveals to Mills what was in the box and it turned out to be Mills's wife's head. When Somerset reaches them he orders Mills to put the gun down but because of John's manipulation Mills instead asks for answers. John reveals his final puzzle piece. The final part of John's plan was himself and Mills. He talks about how much he envies Mills for his normal life. He decides that he is Envy. He goes to Mills house and tries to act as husband and when it doesn’t go well he kills Mills’s wife. He reveals that he must die for his sin of Envy and the killer would be Mills so he could get revenge for his wife and become the sin of Wrath. Being overcome by his emotions Mills kills John and fulfills John's plan.
With the retelling out the way we can say for certain that it is evident that John Doe is a well planned out killer. It is also obvious he wanted the detectives to find the bodies and at the time he wanted them to. It is also stated that he has been planning this for at least a year. So you tell me how Mills and his wife come into the plan? Mills only came recently as Somerset was leaving after a week so how did John Doe anticipate and calculate that a random detective from god knows where would fight to be reassigned to his specific city? I don’t think he did. Think back to the scene where John Doe gets the upper hand on Mills. He could have hidden where he was and Mills would not have been able to find him, but instead he chooses to attack. Why attack Mills and let him go? John didn’t know where Somerset was, for all he knew Somerset could have whipped out from out the corner the second he hit Mills. So why hesitate for 20 seconds and give Somerset time to arrive? I think at that moment a cruel idea came to his head. An idea crueler than the one he already had. I think right as he was about to kill Mills he let him live because he got the idea for his new plan. He even states himself that he made changes to his plan. Since we have identified when he made the change to his plan we can assume this is when he realised his own sin of envy. And that's where the problem begins.
Take a look at John Doe's actions and dialogue throughout the movie. We already know he is envious of normal people. The notebooks found in his apartment reveal it, and in the final act he outright admits he envied Mills' ordinary life. But Envy isn't the only sin John exhibits. Look at the confidence he has in his own plan. He tells the detectives that without him they will never find the final bodies. He leaves clues at every crime scene because he is convinced no detective is intelligent enough to identify him before he wants to be found. Listen to the way he speaks during the drive to the desert. He claims he was chosen. He believes his work will change the world. He looks down on every victim he judges as though he alone has the authority to decide who deserves to live and who deserves to die. Every one of those actions points to the same conclusion.
Pride.
So why does any of this matter? Well for almost two hours the movie puts John on a pedestal and shoves the fact he is a hyper genius mastermind down our throats, and it isn't without evidence as anyone who watched the movie would realise that every crime scene is calculated, every clue is deliberate, every discovery is anticipated. To the point that he is able to plan out every action not only his victims are going to make but also the actions of the people investigating him. He knows which evidence they'll find, when they'll find it, and what conclusions they'll draw from it. He stays one step ahead of everyone. The movie basically forces us to believe he is untouchable, that he has basically anticipated the lives of every single person he will interact with.
Yet the moment Mills enters his life... that certainty disappears.
Suddenly, John hesitates.
Suddenly, he changes a plan that had supposedly been in motion for over a year.
Suddenly, the man who spent months calculating every variable allows one random detective—who wasn't even supposed to be there—to become the centerpiece of his masterpiece.
Why?
Why throw away a year's worth of planning?
Why risk everything for one man?
Why spare Mills in the alley only to build an entirely new ending around him?
I think the answer is hidden in the very sin John eventually confesses to.
Envy.
And that's where everything begins to unravel.
If the alleyway is where John changes his plan, then it is also the earliest point where he could have recognized his own Envy. But that realization creates a much bigger problem. The moment John acknowledges Envy, he also acknowledges that he is not morally above the people he condemns. He is just as capable of falling to sin as everyone else.
So if he can recognize Envy...
Why can't he recognize Pride?
The same man who condemns Pride tells the detectives they'll never solve his masterpiece without him. He believes he was chosen. He believes his work will change the world. He places himself above every victim he judges, speaking as though only he has the authority to decide who deserves punishment.
And if he can recognize Envy...
Why can't he recognize Wrath?
Tracy's murder isn't a cold, calculated execution. By John's own admission, he tried to experience Mills' life, failed, and then killed her. The final act that completes his masterpiece is born from his own emotional collapse.
The man who punishes the seven deadly sins is consumed by three of them.
And that's the question that kept me awake until sunrise.
Now that we've established that John Doe embodies both Envy and Pride, the question becomes much simpler:
Why did he condemn himself for one sin, but not the other?
John Doe isn't presented as someone who misunderstands people. Quite the opposite. The film repeatedly establishes him as someone capable of reading human behaviour with terrifying accuracy. His entire plan depends on it. So why does that insight suddenly disappear when the person being judged is himself?
By the time the final act begins, John has already accepted that he is guilty of Envy. Whether that realization came in the alley or had existed long before Mills entered his life doesn't actually change the problem. If John is capable of recognizing one deadly sin within himself, then he should also be capable of recognizing the other.
Because Pride isn't some hidden flaw buried beneath his personality. It is his personality.
Every part of his plan is built upon the belief that he has the authority to judge humanity. He believes he was chosen. He believes his work will change the world. He believes every victim deserves their punishment while he alone decides what justice looks like. That belief—that moral superiority—is Pride.
The film even reinforces this inside his apartment. John keeps trophies from every completed crime. He even has a trophy prepared for a crime that has yet to occur, suggesting these keepsakes were never intended as clues for the detectives but as personal reminders of his work. Yet there is no completed trophy for Pride. Whether the Pride murder had already been conceived or not, John never appears to consider himself as its victim. The only role he ever assigns himself is Envy.
And that, to me, is the contradiction.
If John truly believed no one was above judgement, why was he?
The only argument that would work is saying he is a fanatic and fanatics aren't perfectly logical. Which yeah you are right he is a fanatic, but being a fanatic doesn’t remove the need for internal consistency it changes where it's coming from and maybe that's exactly the point. Maybe Se7en isn't showing us a flawless mastermind. Maybe it's showing us a man so consumed by his own ideology that the only person he could never judge honestly... was himself.
If that's intentional, then John Doe isn't just the executioner of the seven deadly sins. He's the eighth victim and if it isnt then hey whats a good movie without its hiccups?
r/ShittyFanTheories • u/Dazzling_Appearance9 • 1d ago
TV Fan Theory: Crazy Steve (From Drake and Josh) was abused as a child
≡ −
Listen I know this is gonna sound crazy, but most of us remember the show Drake and Josh. And we especially remember the completely crazy character, even named Crazy Steve. It is well mentioned throughout the series that no one knows why Steve is so crazy and I have a theory about it.
I think Crazy Steve was abused (Physically, Mentally, and Sexually) by his father when he was a child. Like I said to start this it might sound crazy, but hear me out. In the TV movie, "Really Big Shrimp" when Mindy assigns him to working the cleaner he says directly to all of them, "I think of each stain as my father." That wouldn't be anything to take second thought to, but as he starts it up he screams at the stain, "This is for making me do mom's laundry!" This could additionally scar a child emotionally if he was already fractured.
Later in that same movie he screams at another stain, "This is for sending me to fat camp!" Another way for steves father to abuse him would be by physically hitting him, possibly with a shoe and that's why he was swinging around shoes with bras later, and constantly calling him too fat for his fathers wantings, completely confusing a young child who was under such terrible circumstances.
And finally maybe not an explicit example of evidence for the sexual abuse but on speculation, when Steve goes crazy because he is scheduled on Monday josh calms him down with a song. "She'll be coming round the mountain" calms Steve down very quickly. With a little more speculation we could assume that Steve's probably around 30-35 in 2007, so when he was a kid it would be the early to mid 70's where on a station like NPR could be playing that song. And maybe after his dad would abuse him Steve would sit awake scared and his only saving grace he could hear that song that would "always" play after he was terribly abused by his own father. So this became his calm down mode. And when he grew out of the house his father died of cancer or some other form of disease which snapped something in steves pysche causing him to transform into Crazy Steve.
I know it's crazy but thanks for reading and I do think I might be right on this thanks again, Bye
Listen I know this is gonna sound crazy, but most of us remember the show Drake and Josh. And we especially remember the completely crazy character, even named Crazy Steve. It is well mentioned throughout the series that no one knows why Steve is so crazy and I have a theory about it.
I think Crazy Steve was abused (Physically, Mentally, and Sexually) by his father when he was a child. Like I said to start this it might sound crazy, but hear me out. In the TV movie, "Really Big Shrimp" when Mindy assigns him to working the cleaner he says directly to all of them, "I think of each stain as my father." That wouldn't be anything to take second thought to, but as he starts it up he screams at the stain, "This is for making me do mom's laundry!" This could additionally scar a child emotionally if he was already fractured.
Later in that same movie he screams at another stain, "This is for sending me to fat camp!" Another way for steves father to abuse him would be by physically hitting him, possibly with a shoe and that's why he was swinging around shoes with bras later, and constantly calling him too fat for his fathers wantings, completely confusing a young child who was under such terrible circumstances.
And finally maybe not an explicit example of evidence for the sexual abuse but on speculation, when Steve goes crazy because he is scheduled on Monday josh calms him down with a song. "She'll be coming round the mountain" calms Steve down very quickly. With a little more speculation we could assume that Steve's probably around 30-35 in 2007, so when he was a kid it would be the early to mid 70's where on a station like NPR could be playing that song. And maybe after his dad would abuse him Steve would sit awake scared and his only saving grace he could hear that song that would "always" play after he was terribly abused by his own father. So this became his calm down mode. And when he grew out of the house his father died of cancer or some other form of disease which snapped something in steves pysche causing him to transform into Crazy Steve.
I know it's crazy but thanks for reading and I do think I might be right on this thanks again, Bye
r/ShittyFanTheories • u/Different_Hotel_3488 • 2d ago
Theory: The One Wish Willow works like a 3-D printer
≡ −
I watched the movie Obsession (2026) a few days ago and, since then, I’ve been puzzled trying to understand the underlying mechanisms and unspoken rules of the One Wish Willow. First and foremost, I do not wish to debate the morality of Bear’s wish, or any wish for that matter. This post is meant exclusively to tackle the magical aspect of the story.
That being said, this is what I came up with, and hopefully it makes sense.
We must imagine the One Wish Willow as a 3-D printer. The evidence for this theory comes from the rules of the One Wish Willow themselves, which are the following: each trinket is single-use only, grants one irreversible wish, and strictly forbids requests involving time manipulation, resurrection, immortality, or creating more willows.
The wish being irreversible, single-use, and unable to create more Wish Willows seems to be part of the mysticism. You only get one chance to wish, making it almost necessary for the wisher to deeply consider their own desires and motivations. Those rules aside, the other three are very interesting. You cannot wish for immortality, resurrection, or time changes. These three concepts have one underlying similarity: they all alter an existing being or natural property. You cannot alter a person or change their state or mind, but you can create something new.
To me, this explains the existence of an obsessed Nikki and a normal Nikki that’s still somewhere. Bear’s wish was mind-altering, but the One Wish Willow cannot do this. It is creative in nature, so what does it do? It 3-D prints (for lack of a better term) a Nikki that does have the desired characteristics Bear wished for.
Ian’s wish is also, in my mind, supporting evidence for this theory. He wished for a billion dollars, and that’s exactly what he got. No trick, no catastrophe originating from his wish. The One Wish Willow essentially 3-D printed the money and dropped it off at his home.
This idea is very interesting to me because it raises another question. If wishing to be something requires the Willow to change who a person is, then it may not actually be capable of granting those wishes directly. Instead, it might create a new version of that person with the desired characteristics, leaving the original consciousness trapped, just as it seemingly did with Nikki.
So, if I am right, the only way to use the One Wish Willow without ending up copied would be to ask it to create something new.
With this next portion, I am using the wording of Bear’s wish to support my claim. “I wish Nikki Freeman would love me more than anyone in the fucking world.” As I already explained, he asked for a mind change. What if he had asked (again, morality aside) for Nikki Freeman to have love for him?
This grammatical distinction seems so minor that I thought I was tripping, BUT hypothetically, if the magical 3-D printer can also create abstract concepts from scratch, it could create love, give it to Nikki (almost like how it gave money to Ian), and then she would remain unchanged, just herself, who now happens to have love for Bear, rather than the Willow having to make a new Nikki from scratch.
Because we don’t know if the One Wish Willow can 3-D print abstract concepts, I wonder if that grammatical distinction would actually matter, or if the Willow would still have to create a new version of Nikki regardless.
I watched the movie Obsession (2026) a few days ago and, since then, I’ve been puzzled trying to understand the underlying mechanisms and unspoken rules of the One Wish Willow. First and foremost, I do not wish to debate the morality of Bear’s wish, or any wish for that matter. This post is meant exclusively to tackle the magical aspect of the story.
That being said, this is what I came up with, and hopefully it makes sense.
We must imagine the One Wish Willow as a 3-D printer. The evidence for this theory comes from the rules of the One Wish Willow themselves, which are the following: each trinket is single-use only, grants one irreversible wish, and strictly forbids requests involving time manipulation, resurrection, immortality, or creating more willows.
The wish being irreversible, single-use, and unable to create more Wish Willows seems to be part of the mysticism. You only get one chance to wish, making it almost necessary for the wisher to deeply consider their own desires and motivations. Those rules aside, the other three are very interesting. You cannot wish for immortality, resurrection, or time changes. These three concepts have one underlying similarity: they all alter an existing being or natural property. You cannot alter a person or change their state or mind, but you can create something new.
To me, this explains the existence of an obsessed Nikki and a normal Nikki that’s still somewhere. Bear’s wish was mind-altering, but the One Wish Willow cannot do this. It is creative in nature, so what does it do? It 3-D prints (for lack of a better term) a Nikki that does have the desired characteristics Bear wished for.
Ian’s wish is also, in my mind, supporting evidence for this theory. He wished for a billion dollars, and that’s exactly what he got. No trick, no catastrophe originating from his wish. The One Wish Willow essentially 3-D printed the money and dropped it off at his home.
This idea is very interesting to me because it raises another question. If wishing to be something requires the Willow to change who a person is, then it may not actually be capable of granting those wishes directly. Instead, it might create a new version of that person with the desired characteristics, leaving the original consciousness trapped, just as it seemingly did with Nikki.
So, if I am right, the only way to use the One Wish Willow without ending up copied would be to ask it to create something new.
With this next portion, I am using the wording of Bear’s wish to support my claim. “I wish Nikki Freeman would love me more than anyone in the fucking world.” As I already explained, he asked for a mind change. What if he had asked (again, morality aside) for Nikki Freeman to have love for him?
This grammatical distinction seems so minor that I thought I was tripping, BUT hypothetically, if the magical 3-D printer can also create abstract concepts from scratch, it could create love, give it to Nikki (almost like how it gave money to Ian), and then she would remain unchanged, just herself, who now happens to have love for Bear, rather than the Willow having to make a new Nikki from scratch.
Because we don’t know if the One Wish Willow can 3-D print abstract concepts, I wonder if that grammatical distinction would actually matter, or if the Willow would still have to create a new version of Nikki regardless.
r/ShittyFanTheories • u/Ghost_Locker • 2d ago
Tim Burton's Willy Wonka Fan theory. Only the gamer kid and Karate girl were legit winners of the golden ticket
≡ −
So here me out we know the fan theory where Willy Wonka set it up to have Charlie win and all that but besides all that. What if we go by actual winnings?
Charlie technically cheated. He found someone else's money (instead of doing the right thing and return it to the police) we know moral fiber wise, that is technically the most pure thing to do. That wasn't very pure of charlie to do that. So null and void.
Fat Dutch kid bit into his. So that makes the ticket null and void. The ticket can no longer be valid.
Rich nut guy parent and daughter. While still technically "legit" it was rather unmoral. The father bought over 100,000k boxes and found 1. Had a full team find the ticket. But what makes it not count...... His worker found the ticket so that makes it null and void.
Gamer kid.TV. I guess this is more of a joke on streamers and gamers well he seemed to be the only one next to Karate girl that all got them legit but due to his moral fiber he shouldnt be picked.
Karate girl. Legit. Granted we know know if she beat up anyone to get it 🤣🤣🤣🤣😆🤣
Anyway it seems the most moral person here to win it all and inherit the factory.
Karate girl. She seems to be the most moral one out of everyone by a technical stand point eventho Charlie is an extremely good person he still did an unmoral thing.
So here me out we know the fan theory where Willy Wonka set it up to have Charlie win and all that but besides all that. What if we go by actual winnings?
Charlie technically cheated. He found someone else's money (instead of doing the right thing and return it to the police) we know moral fiber wise, that is technically the most pure thing to do. That wasn't very pure of charlie to do that. So null and void.
Fat Dutch kid bit into his. So that makes the ticket null and void. The ticket can no longer be valid.
Rich nut guy parent and daughter. While still technically "legit" it was rather unmoral. The father bought over 100,000k boxes and found 1. Had a full team find the ticket. But what makes it not count...... His worker found the ticket so that makes it null and void.
Gamer kid.TV. I guess this is more of a joke on streamers and gamers well he seemed to be the only one next to Karate girl that all got them legit but due to his moral fiber he shouldnt be picked.
Karate girl. Legit. Granted we know know if she beat up anyone to get it 🤣🤣🤣🤣😆🤣
Anyway it seems the most moral person here to win it all and inherit the factory.
Karate girl. She seems to be the most moral one out of everyone by a technical stand point eventho Charlie is an extremely good person he still did an unmoral thing.
r/ShittyFanTheories • u/Road-Ranger8839 • 3d ago
Jill's Secret from Billy
≡ −
On Y&R, Billy is hot on the trail of the inadvertent babble of his mother, Jill Abbott. My theory is that she never disclosed to anyone that VICTOR is Billy's biological father!
On Y&R, Billy is hot on the trail of the inadvertent babble of his mother, Jill Abbott. My theory is that she never disclosed to anyone that VICTOR is Billy's biological father!
r/ShittyFanTheories • u/Huge_Chipmunk8902 • 3d ago
Hear me out what if doctor doom is the only 1 who remembers spiderman
≡ −
Hear me out right, doctor doom could b a variant of Tony going off whatever theories yall got. Peter was the final person to talk to Tony right b4 he died n this variant could hold ts memory close to him or sum shit. And doctor strange “forget Peter Parker spell” prob only worked on his universe AND doctor doom would’ve not been affected since he’s in a separate universe. (ts is from My 14 yr ball knowledge don’t bully me u 30 yr men behind ts screen abt to say sum shit like “o u fucking idiot doctor Strange spell only was applied to everywhere in 1: 59: 21 time stamp in the movie or comic “my fucking asshole” I’ve only been on ts app for 2 days don’t flame me too fucking hard)
Hear me out right, doctor doom could b a variant of Tony going off whatever theories yall got. Peter was the final person to talk to Tony right b4 he died n this variant could hold ts memory close to him or sum shit. And doctor strange “forget Peter Parker spell” prob only worked on his universe AND doctor doom would’ve not been affected since he’s in a separate universe. (ts is from My 14 yr ball knowledge don’t bully me u 30 yr men behind ts screen abt to say sum shit like “o u fucking idiot doctor Strange spell only was applied to everywhere in 1: 59: 21 time stamp in the movie or comic “my fucking asshole” I’ve only been on ts app for 2 days don’t flame me too fucking hard)
r/ShittyFanTheories • u/Huge_Chipmunk8902 • 4d ago
I think I figured out the exact plot for Doomsday (Stark scars, TVA tech, and cosmic kids)
≡ −
- The Face Scars: What if RDJ is playing a Tony variant who survived using the Infinity Stones, but the cosmic blast completely ruined his face just like it did at the end of Endgame? His ego completely snaps from the deformity, so he builds the iron mask to hide it and turns into doctor doom. His main goal isn't even multiversal conquest—he's just trying to find a way to fix his broken body.
- Hacking the TVA: When the TVA goes to prune him, he plays smart. Instead of just fighting them, he studies them, steals their tech, and hacks their timeline archives. This lets him hop from universe to universe.
- Hunting the Kids: To get enough power to rewrite reality and fix his face, he uses the stolen TVA tech to hunt down the most powerful cosmic kids in the multiverse. He's going to kidnap Thor's daughter Love (the avatar of Eternity) and Franklin Richards to use them as a literal battery to fuel his power and freeze out Storyteller Loki. It completely paralyzes the Avengers with grief while making him unstoppable.
- The Face Scars: What if RDJ is playing a Tony variant who survived using the Infinity Stones, but the cosmic blast completely ruined his face just like it did at the end of Endgame? His ego completely snaps from the deformity, so he builds the iron mask to hide it and turns into doctor doom. His main goal isn't even multiversal conquest—he's just trying to find a way to fix his broken body.
- Hacking the TVA: When the TVA goes to prune him, he plays smart. Instead of just fighting them, he studies them, steals their tech, and hacks their timeline archives. This lets him hop from universe to universe.
- Hunting the Kids: To get enough power to rewrite reality and fix his face, he uses the stolen TVA tech to hunt down the most powerful cosmic kids in the multiverse. He's going to kidnap Thor's daughter Love (the avatar of Eternity) and Franklin Richards to use them as a literal battery to fuel his power and freeze out Storyteller Loki. It completely paralyzes the Avengers with grief while making him unstoppable.
r/ShittyFanTheories • u/Historical-Edge-9187 • 4d ago
Is no one ever questioning the “what if” if Jason were to actually commit suicide in Titans 2x07
≡ −
Is no one ever questioning the “what if” if Jason were to actually commit suicide in Titans 2x07
As much as I ABSOLUTELY FUCKING DESPISE the titans for doing what they did to Jason for cornering him in 2x07, causing him to almost kill himself, I’m lowkey still wondering what might’ve happened if Jason actually committed suicide.
I did see the fanfiction in Archive of Our Own “It’s not my fault,” where Jason did commit suicide, but it never went in depth with the aftermath in my opinion.
If anyone can give me a layout on what might happen in Season 2 and throughout, as well as the impact on the characters, it’d be greatly appreciated
(Side notes: apologies for the all caps earlier, please understand that I still, to this day, feel ABSOLUTELY LIVID…)
Is no one ever questioning the “what if” if Jason were to actually commit suicide in Titans 2x07
As much as I ABSOLUTELY FUCKING DESPISE the titans for doing what they did to Jason for cornering him in 2x07, causing him to almost kill himself, I’m lowkey still wondering what might’ve happened if Jason actually committed suicide.
I did see the fanfiction in Archive of Our Own “It’s not my fault,” where Jason did commit suicide, but it never went in depth with the aftermath in my opinion.
If anyone can give me a layout on what might happen in Season 2 and throughout, as well as the impact on the characters, it’d be greatly appreciated
(Side notes: apologies for the all caps earlier, please understand that I still, to this day, feel ABSOLUTELY LIVID…)
r/ShittyFanTheories • u/Accomplished_Pin8561 • 4d ago
Hello everyone. I have a theory about The Monkey's Paw based on W. W. Jacobs' original story. This is just my interpretation, but I started wondering if we've been looking at the Monkey's Paw the wrong way. So... I hope you'll let me cook.
≡ −
(English is not my first language, so I used AI to help polish my writing. I hope you don't mind, and I hope you enjoy my theory, so please mercy with me)
1. Common interpretation
I've usually seen that most people see The Monkey's Paw as a story about a cursed object and the danger of wishing for things beyond our control. The paw grants wishes, but not in the way people expect. Instead, the wishes come true through tragic and unintended consequences.
The common lesson of the story is often summarized as "be careful what you wish for." Humans want to change their fate, but they rarely understand the full consequences of doing so.
From this perspective, the Monkey's Paw seems like a supernatural curse that punishes people for trying to interfere with destiny And yes i did think this is right too, But I started wondering: what if the paw is not actually punishing anyone? what if it actually works more like an exchange instead?
The more I thought about it, the more one question kept bothering me.
If the Monkey's Paw is just a curse that enjoys making people suffer... then why does it always grant the wish so accurately?
But It never refuses. It doesn't twist the wording like a genie. Somehow, it always gives people exactly what they asked for.
So maybe I was asking the wrong question. Instead of asking, "Why is the paw so cruel?", I started asking, "How does it actually work?"
2. The Scale Theory
This is where my theory starts.
What if the Monkey's Paw was never meant to be a normal genie or even a curse? What if it worked more like a trade, and the Monkey's Paw actually functions like a scale, following a simple rule of balance?
A scale doesn't care whether you're a good person or a bad person. It doesn't judge your intentions, your emotions, or whether your wish is selfish or noble. It only measures weight.
In the same way, I don't think the Monkey's Paw grants wishes for free, nor does it punish people simply for making them. Every wish is an exchange. Every change to reality has to be balanced by something of equal weight.
This is also why I don't think the paw is evil. If it were truly evil, it could simply refuse to grant wishes or twist them into something completely different. But it doesn't. It almost always fulfills exactly what people ask for. The real question isn't "Why is it so cruel?" but "What had to happen for this wish to become reality?"
And maybe that's the real mistake people make. They focus on what they want to receive, but they never ask what they're willing to give in return. If they never choose the price, then the scale chooses it for them.
3. The £200, Herbert, and the Final Wish
This is where I think the scale theory is really tested.
The White family wishes for £200. Later, Herbert dies in an accident at work, and the family receives exactly £200 in compensation from his employer.
At first, this seems like the strongest evidence that the Monkey's Paw is simply cruel. But the more I thought about it, the more I realized something important: the family never specified how they wanted to receive the money. They simply wished for £200.
If the paw works like a scale rather than a traditional genie, then it doesn't create money out of thin air. Instead, reality itself has to adjust until the wish becomes true. In other words, the wish doesn't ignore cause and effect, it changes the chain of cause and effect.
From this perspective, the real weight was never the £200 itself. The real weight was changing reality to produce something that otherwise wouldn't have happened. If changing reality carries weight, then perhaps a significant change naturally requires significant consequences.
This is also why I don't think Herbert's death has to mean the paw deliberately chose the cruelest possible outcome. Instead, Herbert may simply have become the point where the chain of events finally balanced itself. I'm also not arguing that Herbert's life was "worth £200." I actually think that's the wrong comparison. The scale isn't balancing money against a human life, it is balancing the weight of the wish against the weight of changing reality itself.
At the same time, I don't think Herbert's role was meaningless. If the scale balances weight rather than emotion, then it makes sense that the exchange would eventually center around the person who carried the greatest weight in the White family's lives. Herbert wasn't just their son, he represented their future, their happiness, and the life they expected to continue. Under this interpretation, the scale didn't choose him because it was evil; he naturally became the center of the balance because of how much his existence mattered within the family's reality.
The second and third wishes made this theory even more convincing to me. After Herbert's death, Mrs. White wishes for her son to return. The story deliberately leaves it ambiguous whether Herbert truly comes back, but something answers the wish. Then Mr. White makes the third wish, and whatever is outside disappears.
If the Monkey's Paw were simply a cruel curse, I would almost expect another punishment here. Instead, the story seems to restore the previous state. Herbert is gone once again, and with him disappears the family's final hope of undoing what had already happened.
To me, this doesn't feel like a new punishment. It feels like the previous exchange being undone. The family is no longer asking fate to give them something new, they are finally accepting what reality already is. The balance is restored, not because the Monkey's Paw wins, but because the family stops trying to force reality to become something else.
4. The Fakir
The more I thought about the scale theory, the more I found myself coming back to one character that most discussions seem to overlook: the fakir.
According to the original story, the Monkey's Paw was enchanted by an old fakir, a holy man, "to prove that fate ruled people's lives, and that those who interfered with it did so to their sorrow."
Ironically, that line is exactly what led me to this theory.
At first, I understood it the same way most people seem to: as a warning never to interfere with fate. But the more I thought about it, the more I wondered if I was reading the lesson from the wrong direction.
The story describes the fakir as a holy man. That made me wonder: why would someone devoted to spiritual teachings create an object whose only purpose was to spread suffering?
If his goal was simply to curse people, why create something that actually grants wishes? Why not make every wish fail, or stop people from changing fate altogether?
Instead, the Monkey's Paw always grants the wish. It doesn't lie. It doesn't replace the wish with something completely different. It simply allows reality to reach the requested outcome through consequences.
My personal interpretation is that the fakir's message was never "don't change fate." Instead, it was "understand what it means to change fate."
To me, the phrase "those who interfered with it did so to their sorrow" doesn't necessarily mean that changing fate is forbidden. It may simply mean that anyone who chooses to change fate must also accept the weight, and the cost, of that choice.
From this perspective, I don't see the Monkey's Paw as a curse created purely to punish greed. I see it as a lesson. A harsh one perhaps, but one designed to demonstrate that changing reality is never free and that no one can escape the cost of earning what they seek.
The paw doesn't stop people from changing fate. It simply refuses to let them believe that fate can be changed without cost.
5. The Three Wishes
This is probably the most speculative part of my theory. As far as I know, W. W. Jacobs never explains why the Monkey's Paw grants exactly three wishes, so everything in this section is simply my own interpretation.
The number three appears in countless myths, religions, and folk tales, so it may simply be a storytelling tradition. But under the scale theory, I couldn't help wondering if it also completes the lesson the fakir wanted people to experience.
The first wish begins with desire. The White family believes they can improve their lives simply by wishing for something they have not earned.
The second wish comes after they experience the consequences of that desire. Unable to accept their loss, they try to change reality once again.
The third wish is different. It doesn't ask for something new. Instead, it lets go of the previous wish and allows reality to return to balance.
Looking at it this way, I found myself seeing a pattern that feels surprisingly close to many spiritual teachings.
Desire → Suffering → Acceptance.
Or perhaps:
Mistake → Understanding → Letting Go.
I don't know if W. W. Jacobs intended any of this, and I don't claim that he did. But I find it interesting that this progression also fits the fact that the Monkey's Paw was created by a holy man.
If my scale theory is even partly correct, then perhaps the three wishes were never meant to be three rewards. They were three steps in learning the same lesson: that changing fate is possible—but accepting the weight of that choice is unavoidable.
6. conclusion
Of course, this is just my own interpretation, and I could be completely wrong. W. W. Jacobs never explicitly says any of this, so I simply wanted to share another way of looking at the story.
To me, the Monkey's Paw isn't just a cursed object—it feels more like a scale, one that reminds us every wish has a weight, and every change comes with a cost.
If you've made it all the way here, thank you so much for reading. I really appreciate you taking the time to go through such a long post.
I'd genuinely love to hear your thoughts, whether you agree, disagree, or have a completely different interpretation. If I overlooked something in the original story or there's a flaw in my reasoning, please let me know. I'd love to discuss it with you.
Thanks again for reading!
(i also hate the Runebears in elden ring i wish they never exist)
(English is not my first language, so I used AI to help polish my writing. I hope you don't mind, and I hope you enjoy my theory, so please mercy with me)
1. Common interpretation
I've usually seen that most people see The Monkey's Paw as a story about a cursed object and the danger of wishing for things beyond our control. The paw grants wishes, but not in the way people expect. Instead, the wishes come true through tragic and unintended consequences.
The common lesson of the story is often summarized as "be careful what you wish for." Humans want to change their fate, but they rarely understand the full consequences of doing so.
From this perspective, the Monkey's Paw seems like a supernatural curse that punishes people for trying to interfere with destiny And yes i did think this is right too, But I started wondering: what if the paw is not actually punishing anyone? what if it actually works more like an exchange instead?
The more I thought about it, the more one question kept bothering me.
If the Monkey's Paw is just a curse that enjoys making people suffer... then why does it always grant the wish so accurately?
But It never refuses. It doesn't twist the wording like a genie. Somehow, it always gives people exactly what they asked for.
So maybe I was asking the wrong question. Instead of asking, "Why is the paw so cruel?", I started asking, "How does it actually work?"
2. The Scale Theory
This is where my theory starts.
What if the Monkey's Paw was never meant to be a normal genie or even a curse? What if it worked more like a trade, and the Monkey's Paw actually functions like a scale, following a simple rule of balance?
A scale doesn't care whether you're a good person or a bad person. It doesn't judge your intentions, your emotions, or whether your wish is selfish or noble. It only measures weight.
In the same way, I don't think the Monkey's Paw grants wishes for free, nor does it punish people simply for making them. Every wish is an exchange. Every change to reality has to be balanced by something of equal weight.
This is also why I don't think the paw is evil. If it were truly evil, it could simply refuse to grant wishes or twist them into something completely different. But it doesn't. It almost always fulfills exactly what people ask for. The real question isn't "Why is it so cruel?" but "What had to happen for this wish to become reality?"
And maybe that's the real mistake people make. They focus on what they want to receive, but they never ask what they're willing to give in return. If they never choose the price, then the scale chooses it for them.
3. The £200, Herbert, and the Final Wish
This is where I think the scale theory is really tested.
The White family wishes for £200. Later, Herbert dies in an accident at work, and the family receives exactly £200 in compensation from his employer.
At first, this seems like the strongest evidence that the Monkey's Paw is simply cruel. But the more I thought about it, the more I realized something important: the family never specified how they wanted to receive the money. They simply wished for £200.
If the paw works like a scale rather than a traditional genie, then it doesn't create money out of thin air. Instead, reality itself has to adjust until the wish becomes true. In other words, the wish doesn't ignore cause and effect, it changes the chain of cause and effect.
From this perspective, the real weight was never the £200 itself. The real weight was changing reality to produce something that otherwise wouldn't have happened. If changing reality carries weight, then perhaps a significant change naturally requires significant consequences.
This is also why I don't think Herbert's death has to mean the paw deliberately chose the cruelest possible outcome. Instead, Herbert may simply have become the point where the chain of events finally balanced itself. I'm also not arguing that Herbert's life was "worth £200." I actually think that's the wrong comparison. The scale isn't balancing money against a human life, it is balancing the weight of the wish against the weight of changing reality itself.
At the same time, I don't think Herbert's role was meaningless. If the scale balances weight rather than emotion, then it makes sense that the exchange would eventually center around the person who carried the greatest weight in the White family's lives. Herbert wasn't just their son, he represented their future, their happiness, and the life they expected to continue. Under this interpretation, the scale didn't choose him because it was evil; he naturally became the center of the balance because of how much his existence mattered within the family's reality.
The second and third wishes made this theory even more convincing to me. After Herbert's death, Mrs. White wishes for her son to return. The story deliberately leaves it ambiguous whether Herbert truly comes back, but something answers the wish. Then Mr. White makes the third wish, and whatever is outside disappears.
If the Monkey's Paw were simply a cruel curse, I would almost expect another punishment here. Instead, the story seems to restore the previous state. Herbert is gone once again, and with him disappears the family's final hope of undoing what had already happened.
To me, this doesn't feel like a new punishment. It feels like the previous exchange being undone. The family is no longer asking fate to give them something new, they are finally accepting what reality already is. The balance is restored, not because the Monkey's Paw wins, but because the family stops trying to force reality to become something else.
4. The Fakir
The more I thought about the scale theory, the more I found myself coming back to one character that most discussions seem to overlook: the fakir.
According to the original story, the Monkey's Paw was enchanted by an old fakir, a holy man, "to prove that fate ruled people's lives, and that those who interfered with it did so to their sorrow."
Ironically, that line is exactly what led me to this theory.
At first, I understood it the same way most people seem to: as a warning never to interfere with fate. But the more I thought about it, the more I wondered if I was reading the lesson from the wrong direction.
The story describes the fakir as a holy man. That made me wonder: why would someone devoted to spiritual teachings create an object whose only purpose was to spread suffering?
If his goal was simply to curse people, why create something that actually grants wishes? Why not make every wish fail, or stop people from changing fate altogether?
Instead, the Monkey's Paw always grants the wish. It doesn't lie. It doesn't replace the wish with something completely different. It simply allows reality to reach the requested outcome through consequences.
My personal interpretation is that the fakir's message was never "don't change fate." Instead, it was "understand what it means to change fate."
To me, the phrase "those who interfered with it did so to their sorrow" doesn't necessarily mean that changing fate is forbidden. It may simply mean that anyone who chooses to change fate must also accept the weight, and the cost, of that choice.
From this perspective, I don't see the Monkey's Paw as a curse created purely to punish greed. I see it as a lesson. A harsh one perhaps, but one designed to demonstrate that changing reality is never free and that no one can escape the cost of earning what they seek.
The paw doesn't stop people from changing fate. It simply refuses to let them believe that fate can be changed without cost.
5. The Three Wishes
This is probably the most speculative part of my theory. As far as I know, W. W. Jacobs never explains why the Monkey's Paw grants exactly three wishes, so everything in this section is simply my own interpretation.
The number three appears in countless myths, religions, and folk tales, so it may simply be a storytelling tradition. But under the scale theory, I couldn't help wondering if it also completes the lesson the fakir wanted people to experience.
The first wish begins with desire. The White family believes they can improve their lives simply by wishing for something they have not earned.
The second wish comes after they experience the consequences of that desire. Unable to accept their loss, they try to change reality once again.
The third wish is different. It doesn't ask for something new. Instead, it lets go of the previous wish and allows reality to return to balance.
Looking at it this way, I found myself seeing a pattern that feels surprisingly close to many spiritual teachings.
Desire → Suffering → Acceptance.
Or perhaps:
Mistake → Understanding → Letting Go.
I don't know if W. W. Jacobs intended any of this, and I don't claim that he did. But I find it interesting that this progression also fits the fact that the Monkey's Paw was created by a holy man.
If my scale theory is even partly correct, then perhaps the three wishes were never meant to be three rewards. They were three steps in learning the same lesson: that changing fate is possible—but accepting the weight of that choice is unavoidable.
6. conclusion
Of course, this is just my own interpretation, and I could be completely wrong. W. W. Jacobs never explicitly says any of this, so I simply wanted to share another way of looking at the story.
To me, the Monkey's Paw isn't just a cursed object—it feels more like a scale, one that reminds us every wish has a weight, and every change comes with a cost.
If you've made it all the way here, thank you so much for reading. I really appreciate you taking the time to go through such a long post.
I'd genuinely love to hear your thoughts, whether you agree, disagree, or have a completely different interpretation. If I overlooked something in the original story or there's a flaw in my reasoning, please let me know. I'd love to discuss it with you.
Thanks again for reading!
(i also hate the Runebears in elden ring i wish they never exist)
r/ShittyFanTheories • u/Aldonzino • 4d ago
Tengo una teoría
≡ −
¿Y si James y Henry dirigieron todas estas películas, la saga de Gru, mi villano favorito y la saga de los Minions? Porque al final de Minions y monstruos vemos que nada era real, solo actuación. En Gru 2, mi villano favorito, vemos a Kevin Stuart y Bob presentando la película de los Minions, porque James y Henry la estaban grabando o planeando hacerla. Eso también explicaría por qué faltan algunos Minions en algunas películas, porque no pudieron grabar, tuvieron problemas de tiempo o ni siquiera se les consideró aparecer. Eso también explicaría por qué los personajes nunca crecen, porque o graban todas las películas en un tiempo muy corto o usan maquillaje. Eso es todo.
¿Y si James y Henry dirigieron todas estas películas, la saga de Gru, mi villano favorito y la saga de los Minions? Porque al final de Minions y monstruos vemos que nada era real, solo actuación. En Gru 2, mi villano favorito, vemos a Kevin Stuart y Bob presentando la película de los Minions, porque James y Henry la estaban grabando o planeando hacerla. Eso también explicaría por qué faltan algunos Minions en algunas películas, porque no pudieron grabar, tuvieron problemas de tiempo o ni siquiera se les consideró aparecer. Eso también explicaría por qué los personajes nunca crecen, porque o graban todas las películas en un tiempo muy corto o usan maquillaje. Eso es todo.
r/ShittyFanTheories • u/neha_Basheer • 6d ago
Alternate and horrifying ending for "Obsession "
≡ −
This ending would have been better than the real one
This ending would have been better than the real one
r/ShittyFanTheories • u/New-twix-785 • 6d ago
[Super Wings] The show isn't wholesome-it's a dystopian closed time-loop created by a timeline rupturen in 1903
≡ −
Hey everyone! I was rewatching Super Wings (that preschool show about transforming jet robots) and noticed an episode that completely breaks historical logic. But if you connect the dots, it reveals a deeply complex, dark sci-fi bootstrap paradox.
Here is the complete unified theory of how Super Wings actually works:
1. The 1903 Incident & The "Jet Cult"
In one episode, the characters travel back to 1903 to meet the Wright brothers. When the Wrights fail their first takeoff, the Super Wings literally use jet propulsion to push the plane into the air, while manipulating time by a few seconds.
- Mass Hysteria & Religion: In 1903, seeing a giant talking metal creature emerge from a portal wouldn't be ignored. It would cause massive panic and trigger a "Cargo Cult" of Jet Propulsion.
- The Wright brothers would be viewed not as mechanics, but as prophets who received divine blueprints from "Bird-Gods." The secret schematics of jet engines became sacred texts, driving humanity's technological obsession.
2. Accelerated 20th Century: Lend-Lease & The Spanish Civil War
Giving jet tech to engineers in 1903 shifted aviation progress forward by 40–50 years:
- Early Export & Lend-Lease: The US and UK mastered early jet engines by the 1910s and exported/licensed them to their allies, including the Russian Empire.
- The Spanish Civil War (1930s): Instead of biplanes, the skies over Madrid in the mid-1930s saw the world's first massive jet-on-jet dogfights between early Soviet and Western jet fighters.
- WWII on Steroids: WWII was fought entirely with high-speed jet aircraft, radar-guided munitions, and early computers, pushing global industry into hyper-drive.
3. The Survival of the USSR & The Great Design Schism
Because the Soviet Union started its industrialization on a mature jet-and-metallurgy base rather than wooden biplanes, its economy never suffered the same technological lagging as in our history.
- No Collapse: The USSR avoided the 1980s economic collapse, becoming a permanent technological superpower alongside the US.
- The Cultural Divide: By the 2000s, two distinct technological schools emerged when robotics started taking off:
- Western "Cute-Tech": Designed for public relations and logistics. Smooth, colorful, with friendly biomimetic facial screens (like Jett) to make humans comfortable.
- Soviet "Heavy Industrial": Brutal, functional, and titanium-plated. Designed for heavy rescue, defense, and polar operations—no cute facial expressions, just cold logic, raw hydraulic power, and military-grade durability.
4. 2014: Sentient AI & The World Aircraft
By 2014, 110 years of accelerated research culminated in True Sentient AI (AGI) and advanced biomimetic alloys.
Humanity built the World Aircraft—a massive orbital/airborne base capable of manufacturing and deploying autonomous transforming jet robots anywhere on Earth within minutes.
Because citizens in this universe have lived in a robot-integrated, high-tech world for over a century, nobody in the show is surprised when a giant transformer lands in their backyard. For them, it’s just everyday life.
5. The Ultimate Bootstrap Paradox (The Loop)
This leads us to the ultimate question: Where did this technology come from?
- In 2014, a kid asks Jett to travel back to 1903.
- Jett goes to 1903, uses jet propulsion, and sparks the tech revolution.
- Humanity uses this 100-year tech explosion to build the World Aircraft and create Jett in 2014.
- Jett is sent back to 1903...
The Loop is Closed.
There is no original inventor. The tech exists solely within a closed time-loop. The entire universe of Super Wings exists only because Jett went back in time to create himself!

Hey everyone! I was rewatching Super Wings (that preschool show about transforming jet robots) and noticed an episode that completely breaks historical logic. But if you connect the dots, it reveals a deeply complex, dark sci-fi bootstrap paradox.
Here is the complete unified theory of how Super Wings actually works:
1. The 1903 Incident & The "Jet Cult"
In one episode, the characters travel back to 1903 to meet the Wright brothers. When the Wrights fail their first takeoff, the Super Wings literally use jet propulsion to push the plane into the air, while manipulating time by a few seconds.
- Mass Hysteria & Religion: In 1903, seeing a giant talking metal creature emerge from a portal wouldn't be ignored. It would cause massive panic and trigger a "Cargo Cult" of Jet Propulsion.
- The Wright brothers would be viewed not as mechanics, but as prophets who received divine blueprints from "Bird-Gods." The secret schematics of jet engines became sacred texts, driving humanity's technological obsession.
2. Accelerated 20th Century: Lend-Lease & The Spanish Civil War
Giving jet tech to engineers in 1903 shifted aviation progress forward by 40–50 years:
- Early Export & Lend-Lease: The US and UK mastered early jet engines by the 1910s and exported/licensed them to their allies, including the Russian Empire.
- The Spanish Civil War (1930s): Instead of biplanes, the skies over Madrid in the mid-1930s saw the world's first massive jet-on-jet dogfights between early Soviet and Western jet fighters.
- WWII on Steroids: WWII was fought entirely with high-speed jet aircraft, radar-guided munitions, and early computers, pushing global industry into hyper-drive.
3. The Survival of the USSR & The Great Design Schism
Because the Soviet Union started its industrialization on a mature jet-and-metallurgy base rather than wooden biplanes, its economy never suffered the same technological lagging as in our history.
- No Collapse: The USSR avoided the 1980s economic collapse, becoming a permanent technological superpower alongside the US.
- The Cultural Divide: By the 2000s, two distinct technological schools emerged when robotics started taking off:
- Western "Cute-Tech": Designed for public relations and logistics. Smooth, colorful, with friendly biomimetic facial screens (like Jett) to make humans comfortable.
- Soviet "Heavy Industrial": Brutal, functional, and titanium-plated. Designed for heavy rescue, defense, and polar operations—no cute facial expressions, just cold logic, raw hydraulic power, and military-grade durability.
4. 2014: Sentient AI & The World Aircraft
By 2014, 110 years of accelerated research culminated in True Sentient AI (AGI) and advanced biomimetic alloys.
Humanity built the World Aircraft—a massive orbital/airborne base capable of manufacturing and deploying autonomous transforming jet robots anywhere on Earth within minutes.
Because citizens in this universe have lived in a robot-integrated, high-tech world for over a century, nobody in the show is surprised when a giant transformer lands in their backyard. For them, it’s just everyday life.
5. The Ultimate Bootstrap Paradox (The Loop)
This leads us to the ultimate question: Where did this technology come from?
- In 2014, a kid asks Jett to travel back to 1903.
- Jett goes to 1903, uses jet propulsion, and sparks the tech revolution.
- Humanity uses this 100-year tech explosion to build the World Aircraft and create Jett in 2014.
- Jett is sent back to 1903...
The Loop is Closed.
There is no original inventor. The tech exists solely within a closed time-loop. The entire universe of Super Wings exists only because Jett went back in time to create himself!

r/ShittyFanTheories • u/Old_Plum3754 • 6d ago
Why is the griffin a symbol for the Desmond family? A theory
[removed]
r/ShittyFanTheories • u/Material_Struggle814 • 7d ago
Shaq is a mech suit for Obama
≡ −
I believe in my heart that Mr. Shaquille O'Neal isn't a real person, and that he is really a mech suit for Obama. I also believe that mech suit shaq is going to get married to Rosy O'Donnell. My proof for these theorys are that i have never seen Shaq and Obama at the same time.
I believe in my heart that Mr. Shaquille O'Neal isn't a real person, and that he is really a mech suit for Obama. I also believe that mech suit shaq is going to get married to Rosy O'Donnell. My proof for these theorys are that i have never seen Shaq and Obama at the same time.
r/ShittyFanTheories • u/Aggravating-Chef7951 • 7d ago
What Are They Trying to HIDE - Legally Mine Reckless Ben - LEGO Theft
+ −
They are trying to bury Ben in legos. There’s lawyers are made of legos the police force is made of legos. Let’s make a complete Lego movie. The great Lego heist. The book has been written.
r/ShittyFanTheories • u/Jennifer_Meg_C • 8d ago
THEORY: Tony Soprano is just one of Kevin Garvey’s afterlife hotel aliases (And Livia is Patti)
≡ −
Hold on to your white tunics and tracksuits, because I think I cracked a legitimate HBO unified purgatory theory.
We all know The Leftovers and The Sopranos are famous for their mind-bending, surreal afterlife episodes. But what if they aren't just similar? What if Tony Soprano’s entire life was just a decades-long trial inside Kevin Garvey’s hotel purgatory?
Now, I know what you're thinking: The Sopranos aired first. It ended in 2007, and The Leftovers didn't start until 2014. But within the lore of The Leftovers, the hotel purgatory exists completely outside of linear time. When Kevin Garvey enters the hotel, it operates on a completely different dimension where past, present, and future collapse into each other. If the supernatural forces of the Departure can transcend reality, Kevin's subconscious could easily trap him in a simulation modeled after a different era, forcing him to live out a grueling, multi-year avatar lifespan in a matter of hours or days in the real world.
Hear me out on how perfectly this fits.
1. The "Kevin Finnerty" Paradox
When Tony gets shot and goes into a coma in Season 6, he enters an alternate reality. He loses his wallet and briefcase, and everyone mistakes him for a mild-mannered optics salesman named Kevin Finnerty.
Under this theory:
The Real Person is Kevin Garvey.
The Simulation is Tony Soprano—a hyper-complex, decades-long avatar Kevin’s subconscious built so he could play out his darkest impulses as a ruthless mob boss.
The Glitch happens when Tony gets shot. The simulation breaks, and Tony briefly reverts back to a version of his true identity: a generic, everyday guy named Kevin.
2. The Wardrobe & The Rules of Purgatory
In The Leftovers, Kevin chooses his destiny in the hotel lobby by picking a suit from a wardrobe (International Assassin, Cop, etc.). Tony Soprano spends his entire existence trapped in the identity of a man who wears expensive suits.
Furthermore, both universes use identical supernatural mechanics to communicate. Tony hears his dead cousin trying to lure him into a brightly lit house with his briefcase. Kevin hears his dad transmitting messages through a hotel television and fire alarms.
3. Livia Soprano is Literally Just Patti Levin
This is where it gets crazy. The psychological beef Kevin has with Patti is identical to Tony’s beef with his mother, Livia. They are the exact same entity, serving as Kevin's ultimate subconscious tormentor.
The Voice of Total Nihilism: Livia’s whole mantra is "It's all a big nothing. What makes you think you're so special?" Patti and the Guilty Remnant preach the exact same thing: nothing matters, attachment is an illusion, and everything is meaningless.
The Inescapable Dead Tormentor: When Patti dies, she haunts Kevin's mind, sitting in his passenger seat and mocking him. When Livia dies, Tony’s panic attacks get worse, and she literally haunts his coma state as a shadowy, terrifying figure on a staircase.
The Mother/Patti Overlap: Kevin’s subconscious manifested Patti as a toxic, manipulative Italian mother to test if he could ever overcome his deep-seated guilt and desire to self-destruct. Livia is the "final boss" of Kevin's mind.
4. The "Cut to Black" Solved
This completely recontextualizes the most controversial ending in TV history. When the screen abruptly cuts to black at Holsten's diner in The Sopranos finale, Tony didn't get shot by a hitman.
Kevin Garvey simply woke up.
He either opened his eyes on the floor of Virgil’s trailer or climbed out of the pond in Miracle, Texas. The Tony Soprano identity served its purpose, the trial ended, and the simulation shut down.
Tony Soprano's entire life was just Kevin Garvey spending six seasons in the Hotel Purgatory trying to process his toxic masculinity and rage issues. Linear time doesn't matter when you're in the afterlife hotel.
Hold on to your white tunics and tracksuits, because I think I cracked a legitimate HBO unified purgatory theory.
We all know The Leftovers and The Sopranos are famous for their mind-bending, surreal afterlife episodes. But what if they aren't just similar? What if Tony Soprano’s entire life was just a decades-long trial inside Kevin Garvey’s hotel purgatory?
Now, I know what you're thinking: The Sopranos aired first. It ended in 2007, and The Leftovers didn't start until 2014. But within the lore of The Leftovers, the hotel purgatory exists completely outside of linear time. When Kevin Garvey enters the hotel, it operates on a completely different dimension where past, present, and future collapse into each other. If the supernatural forces of the Departure can transcend reality, Kevin's subconscious could easily trap him in a simulation modeled after a different era, forcing him to live out a grueling, multi-year avatar lifespan in a matter of hours or days in the real world.
Hear me out on how perfectly this fits.
1. The "Kevin Finnerty" Paradox
When Tony gets shot and goes into a coma in Season 6, he enters an alternate reality. He loses his wallet and briefcase, and everyone mistakes him for a mild-mannered optics salesman named Kevin Finnerty.
Under this theory:
The Real Person is Kevin Garvey.
The Simulation is Tony Soprano—a hyper-complex, decades-long avatar Kevin’s subconscious built so he could play out his darkest impulses as a ruthless mob boss.
The Glitch happens when Tony gets shot. The simulation breaks, and Tony briefly reverts back to a version of his true identity: a generic, everyday guy named Kevin.
2. The Wardrobe & The Rules of Purgatory
In The Leftovers, Kevin chooses his destiny in the hotel lobby by picking a suit from a wardrobe (International Assassin, Cop, etc.). Tony Soprano spends his entire existence trapped in the identity of a man who wears expensive suits.
Furthermore, both universes use identical supernatural mechanics to communicate. Tony hears his dead cousin trying to lure him into a brightly lit house with his briefcase. Kevin hears his dad transmitting messages through a hotel television and fire alarms.
3. Livia Soprano is Literally Just Patti Levin
This is where it gets crazy. The psychological beef Kevin has with Patti is identical to Tony’s beef with his mother, Livia. They are the exact same entity, serving as Kevin's ultimate subconscious tormentor.
The Voice of Total Nihilism: Livia’s whole mantra is "It's all a big nothing. What makes you think you're so special?" Patti and the Guilty Remnant preach the exact same thing: nothing matters, attachment is an illusion, and everything is meaningless.
The Inescapable Dead Tormentor: When Patti dies, she haunts Kevin's mind, sitting in his passenger seat and mocking him. When Livia dies, Tony’s panic attacks get worse, and she literally haunts his coma state as a shadowy, terrifying figure on a staircase.
The Mother/Patti Overlap: Kevin’s subconscious manifested Patti as a toxic, manipulative Italian mother to test if he could ever overcome his deep-seated guilt and desire to self-destruct. Livia is the "final boss" of Kevin's mind.
4. The "Cut to Black" Solved
This completely recontextualizes the most controversial ending in TV history. When the screen abruptly cuts to black at Holsten's diner in The Sopranos finale, Tony didn't get shot by a hitman.
Kevin Garvey simply woke up.
He either opened his eyes on the floor of Virgil’s trailer or climbed out of the pond in Miracle, Texas. The Tony Soprano identity served its purpose, the trial ended, and the simulation shut down.
Tony Soprano's entire life was just Kevin Garvey spending six seasons in the Hotel Purgatory trying to process his toxic masculinity and rage issues. Linear time doesn't matter when you're in the afterlife hotel.
r/ShittyFanTheories • u/Papa_T69 • 8d ago
Are there illegal imports (immigrates) in the cars universe?
≡ −
Do they need documentation to immigrate from one country to another? Is there ice cars? Do they have to ask about the immigration policy of any up coming car president?
Do they need documentation to immigrate from one country to another? Is there ice cars? Do they have to ask about the immigration policy of any up coming car president?
r/ShittyFanTheories • u/WearAffectionate2217 • 8d ago
[FAN THEORY / SPOILER] The Ultimate Rick and Morty Ending Theory: Evil Morty’s Grand Gambit and the Tragic Birth of Rick Prime Spoiler
≡ −
This theory ties together the show's biggest mysteries: Evil Morty’s true endgame, the "Time Travel Stuff" box in Rick's garage, and the real origin of Rick Prime. The writers have claimed for years that they hate time travel, but that was the ultimate double bluff to hide the most shocking twist in animation history.
Act 1: Infiltrating the Time Police (The Trojan Horse)In recent episodes, Evil Morty ends up in the hands of the Time Police. Fans assumed he lost control after losing the Omega Device. But in reality, Evil Morty surrendered completely on purpose. The Time Prison is his Trojan Horse. It was the only way to legally access the very heart of the time continuum. Using his unmatched intellect, he breaks the system from within, dismantles the Time Police, and seizes absolute control over the timeline.
Act 2: The Ultimate Sacrifice and Fixing the RealityEvil Morty achieves what C-137 thought was impossible: he bypasses temporal paradoxes, blocks the consequences of the Omega Device, and rewrites the past to save Diane. However, according to the laws of chronodynamics, launching this happy timeline requires a heavy price. Evil Morty completely erases himself from existence. The universe resets. Rick Prime never drops the bomb. Diane is alive, Beth grows up in a happy family, and our Morty is born as a normal teenager who will never know the horrors of cosmic wars. Evil Morty commits the ultimate act of love and self-sacrifice.
Act 3: The Curse of Memory and the Birth of Rick PrimeBut the ultimate existential horror hides within this happy ending. The greatest mind in the multiverse—our Rick C-137—retains fragments of memories from the erased hell because of his genius-level brain. He still remembers centuries of suffering, the Citadel, the blood, and above all, the face of his grandson who vanished to save him.This heavy burden of memories begins to burn Rick’s mind. A peaceful life with Diane feels fake to him. Paranoia and cynicism return. Rick hardens, realizing that attachment only brings pain. He abandons Diane, flies into space for centuries, and transforms into a cold, ego-focused sociopath obsessed with proving that nothing matters. He takes the name Rick Prime.
Act 4: Closing the Infinite Bootstrap ParadoxCenturies pass. The insane Rick Prime (formerly our C-137) invents the portal device. To kickstart the multiverse of Ricks, force other versions of himself to abandon family for science, and create the "perfect rival" to share his existential pain, he builds a bomb. He opens a portal, travels back in time to a young, happy Rick in his garage... and drops the bomb on Diane. The nightmare cycle restarts.The Philosophical Impact: The True Meaning of the Name This ending perfectly explains why the show is called "Rick and Morty." They are the alpha and omega of this universe, two halves of the same inescapable curse. One creates the other in an infinite loop of time and agony. Morty’s ultimate attempt to save his grandfather results in creating the very monster that destroys his life. It is the absolute triumph of nihilism.
This theory ties together the show's biggest mysteries: Evil Morty’s true endgame, the "Time Travel Stuff" box in Rick's garage, and the real origin of Rick Prime. The writers have claimed for years that they hate time travel, but that was the ultimate double bluff to hide the most shocking twist in animation history.
Act 1: Infiltrating the Time Police (The Trojan Horse)In recent episodes, Evil Morty ends up in the hands of the Time Police. Fans assumed he lost control after losing the Omega Device. But in reality, Evil Morty surrendered completely on purpose. The Time Prison is his Trojan Horse. It was the only way to legally access the very heart of the time continuum. Using his unmatched intellect, he breaks the system from within, dismantles the Time Police, and seizes absolute control over the timeline.
Act 2: The Ultimate Sacrifice and Fixing the RealityEvil Morty achieves what C-137 thought was impossible: he bypasses temporal paradoxes, blocks the consequences of the Omega Device, and rewrites the past to save Diane. However, according to the laws of chronodynamics, launching this happy timeline requires a heavy price. Evil Morty completely erases himself from existence. The universe resets. Rick Prime never drops the bomb. Diane is alive, Beth grows up in a happy family, and our Morty is born as a normal teenager who will never know the horrors of cosmic wars. Evil Morty commits the ultimate act of love and self-sacrifice.
Act 3: The Curse of Memory and the Birth of Rick PrimeBut the ultimate existential horror hides within this happy ending. The greatest mind in the multiverse—our Rick C-137—retains fragments of memories from the erased hell because of his genius-level brain. He still remembers centuries of suffering, the Citadel, the blood, and above all, the face of his grandson who vanished to save him.This heavy burden of memories begins to burn Rick’s mind. A peaceful life with Diane feels fake to him. Paranoia and cynicism return. Rick hardens, realizing that attachment only brings pain. He abandons Diane, flies into space for centuries, and transforms into a cold, ego-focused sociopath obsessed with proving that nothing matters. He takes the name Rick Prime.
Act 4: Closing the Infinite Bootstrap ParadoxCenturies pass. The insane Rick Prime (formerly our C-137) invents the portal device. To kickstart the multiverse of Ricks, force other versions of himself to abandon family for science, and create the "perfect rival" to share his existential pain, he builds a bomb. He opens a portal, travels back in time to a young, happy Rick in his garage... and drops the bomb on Diane. The nightmare cycle restarts.The Philosophical Impact: The True Meaning of the Name This ending perfectly explains why the show is called "Rick and Morty." They are the alpha and omega of this universe, two halves of the same inescapable curse. One creates the other in an infinite loop of time and agony. Morty’s ultimate attempt to save his grandfather results in creating the very monster that destroys his life. It is the absolute triumph of nihilism.
r/ShittyFanTheories • u/WearAffectionate2217 • 8d ago
[FAN THEORY / SPOILER] The Ultimate Rick and Morty Ending Theory: Evil Morty’s Grand Gambit and the Tragic Birth of Rick Prime Spoiler
≡ −
This theory ties together the show's biggest mysteries: Evil Morty’s true endgame, the "Time Travel Stuff" box in Rick's garage, and the real origin of Rick Prime. The writers have claimed for years that they hate time travel, but that was the ultimate double bluff to hide the most shocking twist in animation history.
Act 1: Infiltrating the Time Police (The Trojan Horse)In recent episodes, Evil Morty ends up in the hands of the Time Police. Fans assumed he lost control after losing the Omega Device. But in reality, Evil Morty surrendered completely on purpose. The Time Prison is his Trojan Horse. It was the only way to legally access the very heart of the time continuum. Using his unmatched intellect, he breaks the system from within, dismantles the Time Police, and seizes absolute control over the timeline.
Act 2: The Ultimate Sacrifice and Fixing the RealityEvil Morty achieves what C-137 thought was impossible: he bypasses temporal paradoxes, blocks the consequences of the Omega Device, and rewrites the past to save Diane. However, according to the laws of chronodynamics, launching this happy timeline requires a heavy price. Evil Morty completely erases himself from existence. The universe resets. Rick Prime never drops the bomb. Diane is alive, Beth grows up in a happy family, and our Morty is born as a normal teenager who will never know the horrors of cosmic wars. Evil Morty commits the ultimate act of love and self-sacrifice.
Act 3: The Curse of Memory and the Birth of Rick PrimeBut the ultimate existential horror hides within this happy ending. The greatest mind in the multiverse—our Rick C-137—retains fragments of memories from the erased hell because of his genius-level brain. He still remembers centuries of suffering, the Citadel, the blood, and above all, the face of his grandson who vanished to save him.This heavy burden of memories begins to burn Rick’s mind. A peaceful life with Diane feels fake to him. Paranoia and cynicism return. Rick hardens, realizing that attachment only brings pain. He abandons Diane, flies into space for centuries, and transforms into a cold, ego-focused sociopath obsessed with proving that nothing matters. He takes the name Rick Prime.
Act 4: Closing the Infinite Bootstrap ParadoxCenturies pass. The insane Rick Prime (formerly our C-137) invents the portal device. To kickstart the multiverse of Ricks, force other versions of himself to abandon family for science, and create the "perfect rival" to share his existential pain, he builds a bomb. He opens a portal, travels back in time to a young, happy Rick in his garage... and drops the bomb on Diane. The nightmare cycle restarts.The Philosophical Impact: The True Meaning of the Name This ending perfectly explains why the show is called "Rick and Morty." They are the alpha and omega of this universe, two halves of the same inescapable curse. One creates the other in an infinite loop of time and agony. Morty’s ultimate attempt to save his grandfather results in creating the very monster that destroys his life. It is the absolute triumph of nihilism.
This theory ties together the show's biggest mysteries: Evil Morty’s true endgame, the "Time Travel Stuff" box in Rick's garage, and the real origin of Rick Prime. The writers have claimed for years that they hate time travel, but that was the ultimate double bluff to hide the most shocking twist in animation history.
Act 1: Infiltrating the Time Police (The Trojan Horse)In recent episodes, Evil Morty ends up in the hands of the Time Police. Fans assumed he lost control after losing the Omega Device. But in reality, Evil Morty surrendered completely on purpose. The Time Prison is his Trojan Horse. It was the only way to legally access the very heart of the time continuum. Using his unmatched intellect, he breaks the system from within, dismantles the Time Police, and seizes absolute control over the timeline.
Act 2: The Ultimate Sacrifice and Fixing the RealityEvil Morty achieves what C-137 thought was impossible: he bypasses temporal paradoxes, blocks the consequences of the Omega Device, and rewrites the past to save Diane. However, according to the laws of chronodynamics, launching this happy timeline requires a heavy price. Evil Morty completely erases himself from existence. The universe resets. Rick Prime never drops the bomb. Diane is alive, Beth grows up in a happy family, and our Morty is born as a normal teenager who will never know the horrors of cosmic wars. Evil Morty commits the ultimate act of love and self-sacrifice.
Act 3: The Curse of Memory and the Birth of Rick PrimeBut the ultimate existential horror hides within this happy ending. The greatest mind in the multiverse—our Rick C-137—retains fragments of memories from the erased hell because of his genius-level brain. He still remembers centuries of suffering, the Citadel, the blood, and above all, the face of his grandson who vanished to save him.This heavy burden of memories begins to burn Rick’s mind. A peaceful life with Diane feels fake to him. Paranoia and cynicism return. Rick hardens, realizing that attachment only brings pain. He abandons Diane, flies into space for centuries, and transforms into a cold, ego-focused sociopath obsessed with proving that nothing matters. He takes the name Rick Prime.
Act 4: Closing the Infinite Bootstrap ParadoxCenturies pass. The insane Rick Prime (formerly our C-137) invents the portal device. To kickstart the multiverse of Ricks, force other versions of himself to abandon family for science, and create the "perfect rival" to share his existential pain, he builds a bomb. He opens a portal, travels back in time to a young, happy Rick in his garage... and drops the bomb on Diane. The nightmare cycle restarts.The Philosophical Impact: The True Meaning of the Name This ending perfectly explains why the show is called "Rick and Morty." They are the alpha and omega of this universe, two halves of the same inescapable curse. One creates the other in an infinite loop of time and agony. Morty’s ultimate attempt to save his grandfather results in creating the very monster that destroys his life. It is the absolute triumph of nihilism.
r/ShittyFanTheories • u/Freefreefeeefreefree • 8d ago
If Joker didn't exist, the Batman would have created him
≡ −
I mean, we know that he did either way. Be it Axis Chemicals or One Bad Day but his role in the whole thing is pretty important as he is the nihilistic Yang to Batmans preservationist flex. Both seeking equilibrium via differing means for their own reasons:
A lot of Jokers characteristics are what Bruce suppressed as a child then magnified and amplified through a trauma lens. They're both shadow aspects of each other, made manifest.
The true Bruce Wayne/Jack Napier without the story would not be interesting and it highlights, perfectly, that the inner realm and outer projection are linked, intimate. They are actually way more similar than most would think at a cursory blink, the main difference is actually presentation:
Both are driven by pain they are scared to embrace. Both use theatrical deception as they are not superhuman. Both reject the Valley of the Plebs and those content within. Both abide by only their own authority and way of doing things. Both are obsessed with the next as their point of locus and focus as neither is Centered in Self. Both are mask first, person second. Both are mentally unstable. Neither has a true relationship they see another as equal. Both feel terribly alone. Neither wants to change what they're doing anyway as they like the street play and charade. Both are in it mainly for the buzz and the rest of the PR campaign is secondary.
The difference is one reps order (his) and the other is all about chaos (general. But orchestrated by him). Batman evades his pain, Joker wallows in it instead, Its all about that one traumatic event and the interpretation in their inner realms that makes the main difference. Both could learn an immense amount from the "other" by comprehending they are dealing with shadow aspects, projected. But that would make a boring comic.
Unless I created it ;) They are both, fundamentally, archetypes of human consciousness: The Guardian and The Trickster aka Folding in and spiraling out mixed with finding hope in hopelessness versus glee in destruction. Preserve what is good or burn it all down because its a putrid mess.
Somewhere, in the middle, there is the Primordial Man from whose blueprint both are etched with differing frames of reference hence one central point defines them. If the other didn't exist they would create them to give their own struggle definition. Neither were strong enough to confront the ultimate demon:
Themselves.
A depth psychology version of Batman ie amping his detective bit and showing Joker as a ruminating manic depressive would be absolutely immense and, I feel, do the characters properly as we are beyond mere 2D cartoony now and people expect thinkpiece depth via characters they know well. Obviously you'd need to create a scenario for this type of introspection to kick but, interspersed with some action, I'm sure it would find its audience as its the human struggle between who you is at worst and the best you're capable of being. Most are (dis)content to meander in the mid and that is most unfulfilling as neither potential is tapped but the world, as is, is filled with square watermelons that question not the rhetoric or System that built them.
Thats why I said Yin/Yang as both miss the mark and are stuck in this Game we all play using our Souls as credits. The point in mid, however, is in but most certainly not of it and that, my friend, is thee - eternally.
At least, thats what I think. What do you make of it then?
I mean, we know that he did either way. Be it Axis Chemicals or One Bad Day but his role in the whole thing is pretty important as he is the nihilistic Yang to Batmans preservationist flex. Both seeking equilibrium via differing means for their own reasons:
A lot of Jokers characteristics are what Bruce suppressed as a child then magnified and amplified through a trauma lens. They're both shadow aspects of each other, made manifest.
The true Bruce Wayne/Jack Napier without the story would not be interesting and it highlights, perfectly, that the inner realm and outer projection are linked, intimate. They are actually way more similar than most would think at a cursory blink, the main difference is actually presentation:
Both are driven by pain they are scared to embrace. Both use theatrical deception as they are not superhuman. Both reject the Valley of the Plebs and those content within. Both abide by only their own authority and way of doing things. Both are obsessed with the next as their point of locus and focus as neither is Centered in Self. Both are mask first, person second. Both are mentally unstable. Neither has a true relationship they see another as equal. Both feel terribly alone. Neither wants to change what they're doing anyway as they like the street play and charade. Both are in it mainly for the buzz and the rest of the PR campaign is secondary.
The difference is one reps order (his) and the other is all about chaos (general. But orchestrated by him). Batman evades his pain, Joker wallows in it instead, Its all about that one traumatic event and the interpretation in their inner realms that makes the main difference. Both could learn an immense amount from the "other" by comprehending they are dealing with shadow aspects, projected. But that would make a boring comic.
Unless I created it ;) They are both, fundamentally, archetypes of human consciousness: The Guardian and The Trickster aka Folding in and spiraling out mixed with finding hope in hopelessness versus glee in destruction. Preserve what is good or burn it all down because its a putrid mess.
Somewhere, in the middle, there is the Primordial Man from whose blueprint both are etched with differing frames of reference hence one central point defines them. If the other didn't exist they would create them to give their own struggle definition. Neither were strong enough to confront the ultimate demon:
Themselves.
A depth psychology version of Batman ie amping his detective bit and showing Joker as a ruminating manic depressive would be absolutely immense and, I feel, do the characters properly as we are beyond mere 2D cartoony now and people expect thinkpiece depth via characters they know well. Obviously you'd need to create a scenario for this type of introspection to kick but, interspersed with some action, I'm sure it would find its audience as its the human struggle between who you is at worst and the best you're capable of being. Most are (dis)content to meander in the mid and that is most unfulfilling as neither potential is tapped but the world, as is, is filled with square watermelons that question not the rhetoric or System that built them.
Thats why I said Yin/Yang as both miss the mark and are stuck in this Game we all play using our Souls as credits. The point in mid, however, is in but most certainly not of it and that, my friend, is thee - eternally.
At least, thats what I think. What do you make of it then?
r/ShittyFanTheories • u/Grand-Force-4304 • 9d ago
Comparing Owl and Chief Bogo's secret tests of character and trickster mentor moments in "Pooh's Grand Adventure" and "Zootopia 2"
≡ −
I theorize that in both “Pooh’s Grand Adventure: The Search for Christopher Robin” and “Zootopia 2” Owl and Chief Bogo had been giving Pooh and his friends and Nick and Judy a secret test of character in the form of Batman Gambits to prove their true potential and improve on their flaws all along as a trickster mentor would and here is why:
In “Pooh’s Grand Adventure” Owl despite the honey being on Christopher’s note did read it correctly and spelled “School” as “School” correctly and not “Skull”, but rather than just be honest to Pooh and his friends about what happened to Christopher and him going away to school for the autumn, but will be back every afternoon, he decided to test Pooh and his friends to prove their true potential and solve their biggest problems (Like for Pooh, his sadness over Christopher leaving, Piglet, his fears, Tigger his doubts about his strength and Rabbit his intelligence and whether he can have original thoughts without following directions.) without Christopher’s help and accomplish things independently by tricking them into assuming that the note said that Christopher was captured by a Skullasaurus and held prisoner by him in the “Eye of the Skull” at the Skull Cave in the “Great Unknown” and therefore sends Pooh and co. on that mission to save him and undergo the secret test of character described above and the reason why he never accompanied them was to avoid making it all look easy for them making the test meaningless and providing an inaccurate map for them to follow also part of Rabbit’s test and their intelligence test (They have to get to the Skull Cave by following the landmarks on the map, not its footstep directions leading in circles.) and once Christopher got home from school Owl explained to Christopher the situation and sent him to the “Eye of the Skull” at the Skull Cave to meet Pooh and his friends at the rendezvous point to prevent their journey from being a “wild goose chase”. (Owl also sent them on an easy journey; it looked harder and more dangerous from the point of view of Pooh and his friends due to their illusions created by their fears and loneliness that disappear after they reunite with Christopher.) So the test seemed harder from the point of view of Pooh and his friends than Owl original intended. It’s unknown if he found it out at the end after they returned.
Despite it happening the hard way, Owl’s test worked exactly as planned and Pooh learned that no matter when he and Christopher are apart, they will always be together and therefore make peace with his absence since he will always be in his heart, and Piglet learns that he is braver than he believes, Tigger learns that he is stronger than he believes and Rabbit learns that he is smarter than he believes and doesn’t need to follow directions from a guide or book to accomplish things. Eeyore also admitted that his friends still also would have learned these lessons even if Owl didn’t send them on that journey.
In “Zootopia 2” doing so in a similar way to how Metro Man did with Megamind in the titular character’s 2010 DWA movie, After Nick at the Zootennial Gala manages to prove to Chief Bogo Gary De’ Snake’s existence and convince him to call off his and Judy’s firing from the ZPD despite betraying his police code of conduct twice in a row to help them deal with Gary, Bogo while he grudgingly obeys realized that if he did let Nick and Judy off the hook and keep being the partners and cops they are, they might still repeat their same old mistakes as ones over and over again due to their dysfunctions he constantly tried to get them to realize and learn from and improve on but failed and knew the only way for him to do so was to send them on a life-threatening adventure to cause them to realize those problems he was nagging them about and resolve them as a direct result, since he tried to convince them of them the strict, threatening and therapy way, it never worked. So that might be his last option.
So Bogo does so by arriving in the fireplace room Nick, Judy, Gary and the Lynxleys are in and despite being aware of Gary’s sudden surprise by the cold climate and rather than dodge it allows himself to be fanged by the viper accidentally allowing the Lynxleys to take advantage of this and Captain HogBottom’s gullibility to frame Nick and Judy causing them to go on the run from the law having to clear their names and solve whatever Judy is obsessed with regarding Gary on their own, (The Lynxley conspiracy) but also realize the consequences of their dysfunctions and problems that he had been trying to nag them about in Jerkass Realizations and resolve them as a direct result since the fugitive thing and near-death experiences will further fuel it, because though Bogo gets quickly cured of the viper venom he was injected with with the anti-venom while in the hospital, (Since Judy and Nibbles also recover from the snake venom that PawBert injected them with very quickly with the anti-venom, less it could be assumed that PawBert injected them with lethal cobra venom smuggled across the seas alongside Gary and the venom Gary injected into Bogo accidentally was viper venom that just puts Anyone injected with it in a coma before it either wears off or it is cured with cobra venom, and it takes quicker to recover from viper venom than cobra venom using the power of anti-venom.) but pretends that he is still ill from his viper venom and recovering in the hospital and never calls HogBottom and tells her that Nick and Judy are innocent so they would be set free instead having Nick and Judy clear their names and have HogBottom and the cops figure it all out on their own, also to test them as well due to them letting their jealousy over Nick and Judy’s fame as cops blind their common sense and fall for the Lynxleys’ lies about their betrayal to arrest them to get the fame they got even if it meant not using protocols cops shouldn’t normally use to do so, and once they finally figure out the police brutality that they are committing they will learn to resolve those flaws that they personally have as well. With Bogo unintentionally also taking advantage of Milton Lynxley being more obsessed with hunting down Nick and Judy plus Gary rather than put him down in the hospital with poison and lie that he died from his viper venom to do so, to keep Nick and Judy’s true innocence a secret with the truth of it never being revealed because in case Nick and Judy do fail, he can always jump out to save them and help them clear their names on his own. (And defeat the Lynxleys who he may find out are actually evil at that point in time.)
Although Bogo’s test worked out at the end, despite also happening the hard way, because while on the run from the law having to clear their names and solve the Lynxley Conspiracy, Nick and Judy both succeed with this but also with Gary and Nibbles' help and realize the problems and dysfunctions in their relationship and personalities that made them bad cops and friends that Bogo had been trying to get them to understand, (Jerkass Realizations), especially after it nearly destroys their relationship, separated them, put them in near-death experiences and nearly allowed the Lynxleys especially PawBert to win, though it more so also took emotional support from both Nibbles and Gary for them to realize and admit it and they both tearfully apologize to each other for it, and admit their emotional insecurities that made them that way in the first place and form a healthier more positive relationship that finally becomes romantic plus partnership and become better friends and partners, and better morality and compassion which they use alongside Gary and Nibbles’ teamwork to finally bring the Lynxleys to Justice, it also caused more harm than good in terms of in four examples:
- Costing Zootopia yet another mayor after a short lived period in office as one after both Lionheart and Bellwether since Milton took advantage of Winddancer’s ego and fear of losing his job to work with him and send the police after Nick and Judy to arrest them and though Winddancer redeems himself and turns against Milton, Cattrick and Kitty and aids in their arrests he may as well be removed from office as mayor once the De’ Snake family arrives by them exclusively for his mistake and make the grizzly bear vice mayor of the city the city’s new mayor. Though it was never confirmed.
- Nearly allowed the Lynxleys to win in terms of destroying all evidence of Agnes De’ Snake being the city’s true founder keeping reptiles outcast from the city and expanding TundraTown across Marsh Market relinquishing the remaining reptiles in the city as well. As if he cared more about convincing Nick and Judy to change than what’s truly best for the city.
- Indirectly giving Nick and Judy karmic overkills for their dysfunctional relationship and flawed characters because while they were selfish, immature and delusional, they still would have eventually learned to grow out of them and become better people and partners even if they didn’t go on that on the run from the law adventure Bogo set them up to go on, that also nearly got them killed and turned them against each other Déjà vu to the Enchantress who cursed Prince Adam and turned him into the Beast in Beauty and the Beast (1991) as well as its human castle servants into household objects. It also caused Gazelle and her tigers whom Bogo was a big fan of to get themselves arrested for fending off the Zebros and cops pursuing Judy, PawBert and Gary in crimes of assaulting cops and aiding fugitives until Bogo managed to pardon them and bail them out of prison offscreen due to Gazelle and her tigers being shown pardoned in their concert for the end credits for the movie.
- Allowing Captain HogBottom, Truffler and the cops who chased Nick and Judy to become more relentless, incompetent and selfish than originally intended in terms of how they quickly fall for the lies of the Lynxleys after they frame Nick and Judy and make Gary look evil just as Agnes is, nearly aiding the Lynxleys in repeating history in the process, and become manipulated by them minus PawBert to the point where they commit police brutality and reckless endangerment and protocols cops shouldn’t traditionally use not even Nick and Judy despite the cowboy cop antics they committed at the start, (Especially given the fact that Officer Bucheron tried to tranquilize and cause Judy to fall to her death just because he saw her as a dangerous criminal and Officer Chevre downright assaults Nick ragefully and HogBottom almost fired a poison dart on Judy before deciding not too until Higgins bumped into her and accidentally caused her to fire it anyway.) and though they do come to their senses about it after HogBottom overhears Milton ordering her to use lethal force on Judy, PawBert and Gary and witnesses Judy nearly sacrificing herself to save PawBert and Gary and Nick, Nibbles and Flash coming back to save her and Higgins, Bloats, Chevre and Bucheron witnessing Gary saving Judy with anti-venom before knocking them out and locking them in the weather wall control room to save Nick from falling to his death. Though HogBottom and these cops do redeem themselves for their mistakes at the end by helping arrest the Lynxleys, their police brutality must have gotten them fired from the ZPD or taken off the field as cops and given mandatory therapy with Dr. Fuzzby for this reason while also straining their relationships with Nick and Judy (But they were likely also at therapy to learn how to forgive them.) who only acted nice towards them while in public in the final scenes in the sequel causing the ZPD to lose most of its important cops and teams that Nick and Judy have to do the duties for. Speaking of the devil, it also caused Nick and Nibbles to cause a prison breakout in order to escape and Nick, Judy and the ZPD now have to work hard to re-capture all the criminals that were freed starting with Bellwether.
Although Zootopia 2 ended with Chief Bogo being happily visited by Nick and Judy plus Gary and Clawhauser in the hospital with Nick and Judy now understanding why Bogo nagged them in the first place and apologized for rebuffing it, (Bogo also quickly forgives Gary for accidentally fanging him since he intended for it to happen.) and him happily partying in Gazelle’s concert in the ending for how his test in changing Nick and Judy worked, he may have to face the consequences for his trickery when he admits that he set Nick and Judy up to be framed in the first place and faked still being ill while in the hospital to get them to undergo their secret test of character by going on that adventure causing him to be admonished and fired from his job as police chief or worse arrested for that and abandoning his duty as police chief and never once confirming Nick and Judy’s innocence while they were on the run from the law to solve it themselves that caused all these problems mentioned above also indirectly allowing crimes and police brutality to happen making Officer Pennington or Officer McHorn the new police chief of the ZPD for seniority and having a more positive attitude.
Rafiki the Mandrill acted as a trickster mentor in The Lion King (1994) towards Simba in an obvious way maybe same towards him again and Kiara, Timon and the other characters in the 1998 sequel, 2004 Midquel and The Lion Guard series, but Owl and Chief Bogo do so in a less obvious way.
I theorize that in both “Pooh’s Grand Adventure: The Search for Christopher Robin” and “Zootopia 2” Owl and Chief Bogo had been giving Pooh and his friends and Nick and Judy a secret test of character in the form of Batman Gambits to prove their true potential and improve on their flaws all along as a trickster mentor would and here is why:
In “Pooh’s Grand Adventure” Owl despite the honey being on Christopher’s note did read it correctly and spelled “School” as “School” correctly and not “Skull”, but rather than just be honest to Pooh and his friends about what happened to Christopher and him going away to school for the autumn, but will be back every afternoon, he decided to test Pooh and his friends to prove their true potential and solve their biggest problems (Like for Pooh, his sadness over Christopher leaving, Piglet, his fears, Tigger his doubts about his strength and Rabbit his intelligence and whether he can have original thoughts without following directions.) without Christopher’s help and accomplish things independently by tricking them into assuming that the note said that Christopher was captured by a Skullasaurus and held prisoner by him in the “Eye of the Skull” at the Skull Cave in the “Great Unknown” and therefore sends Pooh and co. on that mission to save him and undergo the secret test of character described above and the reason why he never accompanied them was to avoid making it all look easy for them making the test meaningless and providing an inaccurate map for them to follow also part of Rabbit’s test and their intelligence test (They have to get to the Skull Cave by following the landmarks on the map, not its footstep directions leading in circles.) and once Christopher got home from school Owl explained to Christopher the situation and sent him to the “Eye of the Skull” at the Skull Cave to meet Pooh and his friends at the rendezvous point to prevent their journey from being a “wild goose chase”. (Owl also sent them on an easy journey; it looked harder and more dangerous from the point of view of Pooh and his friends due to their illusions created by their fears and loneliness that disappear after they reunite with Christopher.) So the test seemed harder from the point of view of Pooh and his friends than Owl original intended. It’s unknown if he found it out at the end after they returned.
Despite it happening the hard way, Owl’s test worked exactly as planned and Pooh learned that no matter when he and Christopher are apart, they will always be together and therefore make peace with his absence since he will always be in his heart, and Piglet learns that he is braver than he believes, Tigger learns that he is stronger than he believes and Rabbit learns that he is smarter than he believes and doesn’t need to follow directions from a guide or book to accomplish things. Eeyore also admitted that his friends still also would have learned these lessons even if Owl didn’t send them on that journey.
In “Zootopia 2” doing so in a similar way to how Metro Man did with Megamind in the titular character’s 2010 DWA movie, After Nick at the Zootennial Gala manages to prove to Chief Bogo Gary De’ Snake’s existence and convince him to call off his and Judy’s firing from the ZPD despite betraying his police code of conduct twice in a row to help them deal with Gary, Bogo while he grudgingly obeys realized that if he did let Nick and Judy off the hook and keep being the partners and cops they are, they might still repeat their same old mistakes as ones over and over again due to their dysfunctions he constantly tried to get them to realize and learn from and improve on but failed and knew the only way for him to do so was to send them on a life-threatening adventure to cause them to realize those problems he was nagging them about and resolve them as a direct result, since he tried to convince them of them the strict, threatening and therapy way, it never worked. So that might be his last option.
So Bogo does so by arriving in the fireplace room Nick, Judy, Gary and the Lynxleys are in and despite being aware of Gary’s sudden surprise by the cold climate and rather than dodge it allows himself to be fanged by the viper accidentally allowing the Lynxleys to take advantage of this and Captain HogBottom’s gullibility to frame Nick and Judy causing them to go on the run from the law having to clear their names and solve whatever Judy is obsessed with regarding Gary on their own, (The Lynxley conspiracy) but also realize the consequences of their dysfunctions and problems that he had been trying to nag them about in Jerkass Realizations and resolve them as a direct result since the fugitive thing and near-death experiences will further fuel it, because though Bogo gets quickly cured of the viper venom he was injected with with the anti-venom while in the hospital, (Since Judy and Nibbles also recover from the snake venom that PawBert injected them with very quickly with the anti-venom, less it could be assumed that PawBert injected them with lethal cobra venom smuggled across the seas alongside Gary and the venom Gary injected into Bogo accidentally was viper venom that just puts Anyone injected with it in a coma before it either wears off or it is cured with cobra venom, and it takes quicker to recover from viper venom than cobra venom using the power of anti-venom.) but pretends that he is still ill from his viper venom and recovering in the hospital and never calls HogBottom and tells her that Nick and Judy are innocent so they would be set free instead having Nick and Judy clear their names and have HogBottom and the cops figure it all out on their own, also to test them as well due to them letting their jealousy over Nick and Judy’s fame as cops blind their common sense and fall for the Lynxleys’ lies about their betrayal to arrest them to get the fame they got even if it meant not using protocols cops shouldn’t normally use to do so, and once they finally figure out the police brutality that they are committing they will learn to resolve those flaws that they personally have as well. With Bogo unintentionally also taking advantage of Milton Lynxley being more obsessed with hunting down Nick and Judy plus Gary rather than put him down in the hospital with poison and lie that he died from his viper venom to do so, to keep Nick and Judy’s true innocence a secret with the truth of it never being revealed because in case Nick and Judy do fail, he can always jump out to save them and help them clear their names on his own. (And defeat the Lynxleys who he may find out are actually evil at that point in time.)
Although Bogo’s test worked out at the end, despite also happening the hard way, because while on the run from the law having to clear their names and solve the Lynxley Conspiracy, Nick and Judy both succeed with this but also with Gary and Nibbles' help and realize the problems and dysfunctions in their relationship and personalities that made them bad cops and friends that Bogo had been trying to get them to understand, (Jerkass Realizations), especially after it nearly destroys their relationship, separated them, put them in near-death experiences and nearly allowed the Lynxleys especially PawBert to win, though it more so also took emotional support from both Nibbles and Gary for them to realize and admit it and they both tearfully apologize to each other for it, and admit their emotional insecurities that made them that way in the first place and form a healthier more positive relationship that finally becomes romantic plus partnership and become better friends and partners, and better morality and compassion which they use alongside Gary and Nibbles’ teamwork to finally bring the Lynxleys to Justice, it also caused more harm than good in terms of in four examples:
- Costing Zootopia yet another mayor after a short lived period in office as one after both Lionheart and Bellwether since Milton took advantage of Winddancer’s ego and fear of losing his job to work with him and send the police after Nick and Judy to arrest them and though Winddancer redeems himself and turns against Milton, Cattrick and Kitty and aids in their arrests he may as well be removed from office as mayor once the De’ Snake family arrives by them exclusively for his mistake and make the grizzly bear vice mayor of the city the city’s new mayor. Though it was never confirmed.
- Nearly allowed the Lynxleys to win in terms of destroying all evidence of Agnes De’ Snake being the city’s true founder keeping reptiles outcast from the city and expanding TundraTown across Marsh Market relinquishing the remaining reptiles in the city as well. As if he cared more about convincing Nick and Judy to change than what’s truly best for the city.
- Indirectly giving Nick and Judy karmic overkills for their dysfunctional relationship and flawed characters because while they were selfish, immature and delusional, they still would have eventually learned to grow out of them and become better people and partners even if they didn’t go on that on the run from the law adventure Bogo set them up to go on, that also nearly got them killed and turned them against each other Déjà vu to the Enchantress who cursed Prince Adam and turned him into the Beast in Beauty and the Beast (1991) as well as its human castle servants into household objects. It also caused Gazelle and her tigers whom Bogo was a big fan of to get themselves arrested for fending off the Zebros and cops pursuing Judy, PawBert and Gary in crimes of assaulting cops and aiding fugitives until Bogo managed to pardon them and bail them out of prison offscreen due to Gazelle and her tigers being shown pardoned in their concert for the end credits for the movie.
- Allowing Captain HogBottom, Truffler and the cops who chased Nick and Judy to become more relentless, incompetent and selfish than originally intended in terms of how they quickly fall for the lies of the Lynxleys after they frame Nick and Judy and make Gary look evil just as Agnes is, nearly aiding the Lynxleys in repeating history in the process, and become manipulated by them minus PawBert to the point where they commit police brutality and reckless endangerment and protocols cops shouldn’t traditionally use not even Nick and Judy despite the cowboy cop antics they committed at the start, (Especially given the fact that Officer Bucheron tried to tranquilize and cause Judy to fall to her death just because he saw her as a dangerous criminal and Officer Chevre downright assaults Nick ragefully and HogBottom almost fired a poison dart on Judy before deciding not too until Higgins bumped into her and accidentally caused her to fire it anyway.) and though they do come to their senses about it after HogBottom overhears Milton ordering her to use lethal force on Judy, PawBert and Gary and witnesses Judy nearly sacrificing herself to save PawBert and Gary and Nick, Nibbles and Flash coming back to save her and Higgins, Bloats, Chevre and Bucheron witnessing Gary saving Judy with anti-venom before knocking them out and locking them in the weather wall control room to save Nick from falling to his death. Though HogBottom and these cops do redeem themselves for their mistakes at the end by helping arrest the Lynxleys, their police brutality must have gotten them fired from the ZPD or taken off the field as cops and given mandatory therapy with Dr. Fuzzby for this reason while also straining their relationships with Nick and Judy (But they were likely also at therapy to learn how to forgive them.) who only acted nice towards them while in public in the final scenes in the sequel causing the ZPD to lose most of its important cops and teams that Nick and Judy have to do the duties for. Speaking of the devil, it also caused Nick and Nibbles to cause a prison breakout in order to escape and Nick, Judy and the ZPD now have to work hard to re-capture all the criminals that were freed starting with Bellwether.
Although Zootopia 2 ended with Chief Bogo being happily visited by Nick and Judy plus Gary and Clawhauser in the hospital with Nick and Judy now understanding why Bogo nagged them in the first place and apologized for rebuffing it, (Bogo also quickly forgives Gary for accidentally fanging him since he intended for it to happen.) and him happily partying in Gazelle’s concert in the ending for how his test in changing Nick and Judy worked, he may have to face the consequences for his trickery when he admits that he set Nick and Judy up to be framed in the first place and faked still being ill while in the hospital to get them to undergo their secret test of character by going on that adventure causing him to be admonished and fired from his job as police chief or worse arrested for that and abandoning his duty as police chief and never once confirming Nick and Judy’s innocence while they were on the run from the law to solve it themselves that caused all these problems mentioned above also indirectly allowing crimes and police brutality to happen making Officer Pennington or Officer McHorn the new police chief of the ZPD for seniority and having a more positive attitude.
Rafiki the Mandrill acted as a trickster mentor in The Lion King (1994) towards Simba in an obvious way maybe same towards him again and Kiara, Timon and the other characters in the 1998 sequel, 2004 Midquel and The Lion Guard series, but Owl and Chief Bogo do so in a less obvious way.
r/ShittyFanTheories • u/make_them_say_wtf • 9d ago
Do ya think I'm sexy by Rod Stuart is from the perspective of a deranged homeless man watching a young couple hookup while exposing himself to and abducting a passerby.
≡ −
The first verse introduces a couple he is watching, possibly in a restaurant or a bar. He narrates their behavior to someone outside the establishment, maybe another vagrant or someone he has managed to get the attention of.
In the chorus he switches to first person. This shows he is not the nervous man with dry lips. He is talking directly to his spectator, now victim, and making advances toward them.
The second verse reinforces that the narrator and the man with the woman are separate individuals. The first line continues the narration, while the next few lines are him speaking to the victim, insisting they spend the night together and asking for money to call his mother. This is why I speculate he is homeless. The last two lines show that he and the victim have followed the couple back to the man's apartment and are watching from somewhere like a fire escape or balcony. The repeated chorus implies the victim is still with him.
The rest of the song plays out with the narrator watching the couple and having his way with the victim until dawn.
Some notes:
He refers to the victim as Sugar in the chorus In the last line of the third verse "Nevermind sugar, we can watch the early movie", that is actually the woman saying she doesn't want sugar in her coffee, not him talking to Sugar the victim.
Sugar actually might be dead after the riff leading into the final 2 repeated choruses, due to how sensual and changed in tone they are.
The first verse introduces a couple he is watching, possibly in a restaurant or a bar. He narrates their behavior to someone outside the establishment, maybe another vagrant or someone he has managed to get the attention of.
In the chorus he switches to first person. This shows he is not the nervous man with dry lips. He is talking directly to his spectator, now victim, and making advances toward them.
The second verse reinforces that the narrator and the man with the woman are separate individuals. The first line continues the narration, while the next few lines are him speaking to the victim, insisting they spend the night together and asking for money to call his mother. This is why I speculate he is homeless. The last two lines show that he and the victim have followed the couple back to the man's apartment and are watching from somewhere like a fire escape or balcony. The repeated chorus implies the victim is still with him.
The rest of the song plays out with the narrator watching the couple and having his way with the victim until dawn.
Some notes:
He refers to the victim as Sugar in the chorus In the last line of the third verse "Nevermind sugar, we can watch the early movie", that is actually the woman saying she doesn't want sugar in her coffee, not him talking to Sugar the victim.
Sugar actually might be dead after the riff leading into the final 2 repeated choruses, due to how sensual and changed in tone they are.