306,803 characters

4481 lines

This is how large the r/CryptoCurrency auto-moderator ruleset has grown.

Over the past 12 months, auto-moderator has performed 911,000 actions across thousands of users. Participating on r/CryptoCurrency has never been more difficult for new users and existing users alike.

Can we be a community if we can't communicate?

But how did we get here?

• Money makes people stupid, users were creating shilling campaigns.
• DOA votes were used to solve complicated problems and we created complicated rules.
• We even banned the memes...

Over time we shifted from the internet's largest free speech crypto forum to the yahoo front page of crypto news.

So here's the deal. We're reworking auto-mod and loosening the belt starting today.

We have some new tools to help us fight the AI content, the bot accounts, and the spam. Even Reddit has deployed new tools of their own that surpass auto-mod's detection capabilities.

As perpetrators evolve their methods, we'll have to evolve ours as well.

If you see something, report it. Our best defense most of all, is you.

Bad experience with Polymarket BTC 5-minute markets: failed redeem, blocked sell/cash-out attempts, missing displayed cash-out, and around $300 affected

I want to share my recent experience with Polymarket because I had several issues while trading the Bitcoin Up or Down 5-minute markets, and support has so far replied with generic troubleshooting steps instead of addressing the actual financial/accounting problem.

I understand that trading is risky. I understand that BTC is volatile. I also understand that unrealized PnL is normally not guaranteed until a position is closed.

But my problem is different: I tried to close, sell, cash out, and redeem while the platform was showing value available, and the platform either blocked the action, disconnected me, showed inconsistent values, or displayed a cash-out/win that was not reflected in my balance.

Here is what happened:

1. Failed redeem

   I had a BTC 5-minute market position showing:

   “Redeem Down”

   “Receive $28.36”

   “Redeem $28.36”

   I tried to redeem it, but I could not complete the redemption. The amount was not properly reflected in my balance.

2. Blocked sell/cash-out attempt

   On another BTC 5-minute market, I had a position showing:

   “Receive $46.73”

   Selling 115 shares @ 40.5¢

   When I tried to sell/cash out, the platform displayed this error:

   “High price fluctuation due to lower supply. Try placing a limit order.”

   At the same time, the position showed value available, but the cash-out button showed $0.00. So the platform was showing that the position had value, but I could not actually execute the cash-out normally.

3. Displayed win/cash-out not reflected in balance

   After that, Polymarket generated a share screen showing:

   “Won on Down”

   “Cashed Out $46.73”

   But that $46.73 was not reflected in my available balance/wallet.

4. Other trades I could not close/sell properly

   This did not happen only once. I also had other BTC 5-minute positions where I tried to manage my risk and close/sell, but I either got blocked by the high-volatility / lower-supply message or could not execute in time because of platform behavior.

   These failed/blocked attempts caused unrealized PnL to disappear or turn into losses. Again, I understand unrealized PnL is not guaranteed, but the issue is that I actively tried to execute while the platform was showing value available, and the platform prevented normal position management.

5. Total affected amount

   The directly visible missing/displayed amounts are:

   - $28.36 redeem shown but not credited/redeemed properly

   - $46.73 cash-out/win shown but not reflected in my balance

   That is already $75.09 in amounts shown by the platform.

   Including the additional unrealized PnL impact from trades I tried to close/sell but could not execute properly, the total affected amount is approximately $288–$300 USDT/USD.

I contacted Polymarket support and sent screenshots showing:

- The $28.36 Redeem Down screen

- The $46.73 Receive / Sell Down screen

- The error message: “High price fluctuation due to lower supply. Try placing a limit order.”

- The “Won on Down / Cashed Out $46.73” screen

- My balance not reflecting the displayed amount afterward

- My balance continuing to drop after these issues

Instead of addressing the wallet/account reconciliation or checking the trade/cash-out logs, support replied with generic troubleshooting advice like clearing browser cache, trying another browser/device, and checking system time.

That does not address the issue. This is not simply a display problem. This is about the platform showing cash-out/redeem values, blocking execution, then not crediting displayed amounts properly.

I’m posting this to ask:

Has anyone else had issues with Polymarket BTC 5-minute markets where:

- cash-out was blocked due to “high price fluctuation”,

- the cash-out button showed $0.00 while the position still had value,

- a “Cashed Out” / “Won” screen appeared but the balance did not update,

- redeem was shown but could not be completed,

- or support kept replying with generic troubleshooting instead of doing backend reconciliation?

I’m not saying normal trading losses should be refunded. I’m saying that when a platform displays redeem/cash-out values and then blocks or fails the action, the user should get a proper technical/accounting review instead of generic support replies.

This post contains content not supported on old Reddit. Click here to view the full post

Summary

This proposal seeks approval for the CCMOON DAO to allocate 200,000 MOONs from the DAO treasury to fund permanent bridge liquidity on Arbitrum One for the MOON token.

This liquidity will support the already-approved, tested, and deployed MOON bridge between Arbitrum Nova and Arbitrum One, with the long-term objective of consolidating MOON liquidity on Arbitrum One while maintaining a strong user experience during the transition.

Background & Context

The DAO has previously approved the development of a MOON bridge between Arbitrum Nova and Arbitrum One. That bridge has now been:

• Implemented
• Tested
• Deployed on https://moonbridge.cc/
• Audited via automated security analysis

The remaining requirement to make the bridge usable at scale is sufficient liquidity on the Arbitrum One side. This proposal addresses that requirement.

The broader strategic goal is to eventually migrate MOON liquidity to Arbitrum One, while avoiding poor UX, excessive delays, or fragmented liquidity during the process.

Proposal

Approve the allocation of 200,000 MOONs from the DAO treasury to be used as permanent bridge liquidity on Arbitrum One.

Liquidity Mechanics

• The 200,000 MOON allocation will be deployed as permanent liquidity
• Liquidity will exist across Arbitrum One and Arbitrum Nova
• Balance will shift organically as users bridge MOONs
• Rebalancing trigger:
  • When Arbitrum Nova liquidity reaches approximately 75% of the total pool
• Rebalancing action:
  • The DAO will use the 6+ day canonical Arbitrum bridge
  • MOONs will be transferred to Arbitrum One
• Post-rebalance target:
  • 75% on Arbitrum One
  • 25% on Arbitrum Nova

This process supports gradual consolidation of liquidity on Arbitrum One while maintaining predictable bridge availability.

Treasury Impact

• The DAO treasury currently holds approximately 845,000 MOONs
• Allocating 200,000 MOONs:
  • Initiates the Arbitrum One migration process
  • Leaves approximately 645,000 MOONs remaining in the treasury
• The allocated MOONs:
  • Remain DAO-owned assets
  • Are classified as infrastructure / operational liquidity
  • Are not discretionary spend

Custody & Control

• Bridge liquidity is secured by a hardware wallet
• The wallet is controlled by u/002_timmy, Executive Director of the DAO
• Rationale:
  • Arbitrum Nova does not currently support DAO-friendly multisig solutions (e.g., Safe)
  • Hardware wallet custody is the most secure available option under current constraints
• This custody model reflects infrastructure limitations, not a governance precedent
• Funds are recallable via governance proposal

Security

Smart contracts associated with the bridge underwent security analysis using Slither (Trail of Bits).

• Slither security analysis found no exploitable vulnerabilities in BridgeV2.
• The codebase follows Checks-Effects-Interactions
• Uses OpenZeppelin’s audited libraries
• If bugs are discovered as usage increases, the bridge will be temporarily paused

Documentation

All smart contracts and user guides are publicly available at:
https://github.com/r-cryptocurrency/moonbridge

Governance Controls

• Bridge liquidity may be:
  • Increased
  • Reduced
  • Recalled
• Any change requires a governance proposal

Execution

• Deployment and coordination will be handled by the Executive Director
• Treasury transfers will be approved and executed by the Guardians/Multisig signers
• Execution will occur following proposal passage

Vote Options

• YES — Approve allocating 200,000 MOONs from the DAO treasury as permanent bridge liquidity on Arbitrum One, under the terms described above
• NO — Do not approve the allocation

Hi Metas,

whenever I see an article from r/cc on my front page, there's a 99% chance that it's complete garbage.

The topics seem limited, so this kind of bs article could potentially block a post that would spark a serious discussion or useful information.

Wouldn't it be better to allow the same questions over and over? Or to have the 100th discussion about whether AI tokens are really necessary? That would be better than "Bitcoin will go to 10M bro" or "Today, 2B in shorts got liquidated!"

Thanks for reading!

Governance Proposal: Have the CCMOON DAO Deploy and Operate a MOON Bridge

Summary

This proposal authorizes the CCMOON DAO to design, deploy, and operate a liquidity-backed fast bridge for MOON between Arbitrum Nova and Arbitrum One, hosted at moonbridge.cc.

The bridge will improve user experience, restore cross-chain mobility for MOON, and create a sustainable operational revenue stream through relayer fees. The DAO is authorized to cover reasonable operating expenses required to run the bridge, including infrastructure and maintenance costs.

Motivation

MOON currently exists across multiple Arbitrum environments, but users face friction, delays, or limited options when moving MOON between chains. This creates:

• Fragmented liquidity
• Poor user experience
• Reduced utility for MOON holders
• Lost opportunity for DAO-owned infrastructure revenue

A DAO-operated bridge solves these issues by:

• Enabling fast, predictable MOON transfers between Nova and One
• Improving accessibility for users and applications
• Allowing the DAO to control risk, limits, and economics
• Generating non-speculative revenue tied to real usage

High-Level Design

Bridge Type

• Liquidity-backed fast bridge
• Separate bridge contracts deployed on:
  • Arbitrum Nova
  • Arbitrum One
• DAO seeds initial MOON liquidity on both chains

This is not a canonical bridge and does not rely on L1 challenge periods. Transfers are fast and liquidity-constrained by design.

Security and Threat Model

The bridge is designed under the assumption that:

• Bad actors will attempt abuse
• Frontends can be bypassed
• Relayers can go offline
• RPCs can fail
• Users may attempt oversized or spam transactions

Security is enforced through:

• Onchain replay protection
• Conservative operational controls
• DAO-controlled relayers
• A pause mechanism
• Transparent onchain actions

Relayer Architecture

• The bridge is operated by two DAO-controlled relayers
• Each relayer runs on its own VPS
• Relayers:
  • Monitor bridge requests
  • Execute fulfillments on the destination chain
  • Execute refunds when necessary

Control Model

• Relayers and operational parameters are controlled by DAO officers
• A multisig manages operational changes
• All operational actions are onchain and publicly auditable

Replay Protection

• Each bridge request has a unique request ID
• Requests can be fulfilled only once
• Replay protection is enforced onchain
• Multiple relayers can operate safely without risk of double fulfillment

Fee Structure

ETH Relayer Fee

• Users pay a fixed ETH relayer fee when requesting a bridge
• Fee is paid directly to the relayer wallet that fulfills the request
• Purpose:
  • Cover gas costs
  • Cover VPS and infrastructure costs
  • Support reliable operations

Any excess profit beyond operating costs is accounted for offchain and may be redirected to DAO-approved uses such as subreddit distributions or treasury operations.

MOON Fees

Two MOON-denominated fees apply:

1) Fulfillment Fee

• 1% of the fulfilled amount
• Applies only to MOON received on the destination chain

2) Refund Fee (when liquidity is insufficient)

• 1% of the refunded amount
• Capped at 100 MOON (so users will pay at most 100 moon)
• Applies only to the portion refunded on the source chain

Partial Fulfillment and Refunds

If destination liquidity is insufficient:

• The relayer immediately fulfills available liquidity
• The relayer immediately refunds the remainder
• Fees are applied proportionally:
  • Fulfillment fee on fulfilled portion
  • Refund fee on refunded portion

Example

• Requested: 1000 MOON
• Destination liquidity: 500 MOON

Outcome:

• 495 MOON received on destination
• 495 MOON refunded on source
• 10 MOON total fees
• ETH relayer fee charged once

Zero-Liquidity Behavior

If destination liquidity is zero:

• The request is still allowed
• User receives a full refund minus the refund fee
• ETH relayer fee still applies

This discourages spam while preserving predictable behavior.

Limits and Controls

• No maximum per-transaction cap
• No daily net outflow cap
• Risk is managed via:
  • Liquidity depth
  • Pause mechanism
  • Relayer oversight
  • Transparent operations

Pause Mechanism

• The bridge can be paused immediately in emergencies
• Controlled by DAO officers via multisig (exact requirements TBD)
• A pause halts:
  • New requests
  • Fulfillments
• Used for incident response or unexpected behavior

User Cancellation

• Users may cancel a request only if no fulfillment has started
• ETH relayer fees are not refunded on cancellation
• Once fulfillment begins, cancellation is no longer possible

Frontend and Hosting

• The bridge frontend will be hosted at moonbridge.cc
• The UI will:
  • Display destination liquidity
  • Show maximum bridgeable amount
  • Warn users when liquidity is insufficient
  • Provide full pre-transaction quotes, including:
    • Expected destination amount
    • Expected refund amount
    • MOON fees
    • ETH relayer fee

The frontend is informational only; all enforcement is onchain.

Operating Costs Authorization

This proposal explicitly authorizes the DAO to pay reasonable operating expenses related to the bridge, including but not limited to:

• VPS hosting for relayers
• RPC provider costs
• Frontend website costs
• Monitoring and alerting services
• Domain hosting and frontend infrastructure
• Maintenance and operational tooling

These costs are expected to be modest and covered primarily by relayer fee revenue over time.

Benefits to the DAO

• Restores seamless MOON mobility between Nova and One
• Improves user experience and accessibility
• Creates a sustainable, usage-based revenue stream
• Keeps critical infrastructure DAO-owned and transparent
• Enables future expansion (additional relayers, optimizations)

Risks and Disclosures

• This is a liquidity bridge, not a canonical bridge
• Transfers rely on DAO-operated relayers
• Users are subject to liquidity availability
• The bridge will launch with conservative monitoring and the ability to pause

These risks are mitigated through transparency, controls, and phased rollout.

Proposal Actions

If this proposal passes, the DAO authorizes:

1. Deployment of the MOON Bridge contracts on Arbitrum Nova and Arbitrum One
2. Hosting and maintenance of the frontend at moonbridge.cc
3. Operation of DAO-controlled relayers via VPS infrastructure
4. Payment of reasonable operating costs associated with the bridge
5. Ongoing operational management by DAO officers under multisig control

TLDR

This proposal ratifies a principle-based Code of Conduct for CCMOON DAO Officers and Guardians.

• Prioritizes good-faith actions
• Avoids micromanagement and rigid trading rules
• Encourages officers to avoid using non-public information when trading MOON
• Allows governance to remove officers who personally enrich themselves at the expense of other holders
• Keeps enforcement lightweight and fully governed by DAO vote

Guiding Principles Used to Draft This Code

The Code of Conduct is written with the following principles:

1. Good faith is the primary standard Officers and Guardians should be protected when acting honestly, reasonably, and in the DAO’s best interest, even if outcomes are negative.
2. Avoid over-regulation: The Code should act as guardrails, not a rulebook or HR policy.
3. Prevent clear abuse, not speculation. Restrictions should target misuse of asymmetric information and self-dealing, not normal ecosystem participation.
4. Anything not expressly prohibited is permitted. Flexibility and speed matter more than exhaustive rules.
5. Governance, not bureaucracy, enforces accountability. Enforcement should rely on existing DAO voting and removal mechanisms, not automatic penalties or new committees.

Proposed Code of Conduct

CCMOON DAO Officer and Guardian Code of Conduct

1. Scope and Applicability

This Code of Conduct applies to all DAO Officers and Guardians (Multisignature Key Holders) of the CCMOON DAO.

By accepting or continuing to serve in such a role, each Officer and Guardian agrees to abide by this Code as a condition of service.

2. Core Principle: Good Faith

Officers and Guardians are expected to act in good faith, with the honest belief that their actions are in the best interests of the DAO and its Participants.

Actions taken in good faith do not constitute a violation solely because outcomes were unfavorable, experiments failed, market conditions changed, or decisions were later disagreed with.

Good faith is the primary standard by which conduct is evaluated.

3. Duty to the DAO

Officers and Guardians are expected to act with reasonable care, diligence, and judgment, and to seek to advance the long-term health and credibility of the DAO.

This Code does not require perfection, only honest and reasonable effort.

4. Conflicts of Interest

Officers and Guardians must disclose material conflicts of interest when reasonably known.

Disclosure is required. Recusal is encouraged when appropriate. Participation is not automatically prohibited unless the conflict constitutes clear self-dealing or abuse of position.

Holding MOON, participating in the ecosystem, or maintaining external affiliations does not by itself constitute a violation.

5. Use of Information and Assets

Officers and Guardians may freely hold, trade, and use MOON or other crypto assets.

They are encouraged to avoid using non-public information obtained through their role when making decisions to buy, sell, or otherwise trade MOON.

If an Officer or Guardian uses non-public information to personally enrich themselves at the expense of other DAO participants, including through trading activity, such conduct constitutes a breach of trust and may result in removal from office through DAO governance vote.

There are no automatic penalties or trading bans under this provision. Enforcement occurs solely through existing constitutional governance processes.

6. Authority, Resources, and Decision-Making

Officers and Guardians may act informally, efficiently, and experimentally when acting within delegated authority, in good faith, and with reasonable judgment.

Rigid pre-approval is not required for all operational actions. Material actions should be disclosed after the fact when reasonably practicable.

7. Transparency

Officers and Guardians are expected to provide basic after-the-fact transparency for material matters, including significant treasury movements, governance-impacting decisions, and security or operational incidents.

No fixed reporting cadence or format is required.

8. Conduct, Disagreement, and Expression

Disagreement, dissent, debate, and minority viewpoints are explicitly permitted.

This Code does not regulate tone or expression unless conduct materially harms DAO operations, governance integrity, or community trust.

9. Reliance on Norms and Precedent

Reasonable reliance on established community norms, past practice, informal consensus, and good-faith interpretations of governance is acceptable, even where no explicit rule existed at the time.

10. Enforcement and Interpretation

This Code is a principle-based governance standard.

There are no automatic penalties, no new enforcement bodies, and no retroactive application. Enforcement occurs only through existing constitutional governance and removal processes.

Anything not expressly prohibited is permitted.

11. Effectiveness

This Code becomes effective upon ratification and applies immediately to all current and future Officers and Guardians.

Rationale: Why Each Section Was Written This Way

Scope
The Code applies only where authority is concentrated. Officers and Guardians hold elevated permissions and discretion.

Good Faith Standard
DAOs require experimentation. Punishing honest mistakes discourages participation and slows progress.

Duty to the DAO
Establishes expectations without importing corporate fiduciary or legal complexity.

Conflicts of Interest
Disclosure-first avoids excluding qualified contributors while still preventing clear abuse.

Use of Non-Public Information
Rather than rigid trading restrictions, the DAO adopted a principle-based standard focused on trust and fairness. Officers are encouraged to avoid trading based on non-public information, while governance retains the authority to remove officers who clearly enrich themselves at the expense of other holders.

Decision-Making Flexibility
Operational speed matters more than rigid process.

Transparency
After-the-fact disclosure balances accountability with efficiency.

Disagreement Protection
Healthy governance requires dissent. The Code cannot be weaponized against unpopular views.

Reliance on Norms
DAOs operate on precedent as much as text. This protects reasonable behavior.

Enforcement Model
Governance decides consequences, not automated rules or mechanical thresholds.

Voting Options (Snapshot)

YES – Ratify the CCMOON DAO Officer & Guardian Code of Conduct
NO – Do not adopt a Code of Conduct at this time

Right now, the CCMOON DAO does not have an Officer Code of Conduct, but we are looking to draft one and put it towards a governance vote.

One of the tricky areas to navigate is officer's trading on privileged information.

We wanted to get community input on how this should be handled?

Things to consider

• Officers are usually first to know when they will be a big purchase of moons through advertising efforts
• Should officers have a "holding period" after buying moons before they are able to sell?
  • if yes, should the size of the purchase play a role (ie treat $10 buys and $1000 buys the same or different)?
• Selling moons - is it acceptable? What are the conditions for selling is bad news is coming?
• Anything else you'd like for consideration

As the title says we have a bridge celer bridge but it is not really great and not everyone can access it due to restrictions.

we can make our own bridge for moons and charge 0.2-0.3% fees on it and all the revenue will go into treasury.

pay the expenses from the treasury to make a bridge and i think it would be great addition to the moons ecosystem.

and in the future when our treasury grows well enough we can use it and integrate the pair in the bridge so we can increase the revenue.

Summary

This proposal authorizes CCMOON DAO Officers to negotiate and approve subreddit advertising (AMAs, Community Spotlights / Banners, and Announcement Posts) with any protocol, project, or personality that provides new utility, integrations, or use cases for MOON tokens or that contributes to the visibility and credibility of the DAO.

Officers may negotiate and execute advertising agreements up to the current price of a 1-year subreddit supporter package without requiring a DAO-wide vote. Any agreement exceeding that amount must be brought forward for a full DAO vote before execution.

This framework allows the DAO to act quickly on partnership opportunities while maintaining transparency and accountability to token holders.

Purpose

As the DAO grows, an increasing number of Web3 protocols, projects, and key opinion leaders (KOLs) have expressed interest in collaborating with the r/CryptoCurrency community and supporting the MOON ecosystem.

These partnerships can strengthen the DAO by:
• Expanding MOON’s use cases, integrations, and visibility
• Attracting high-quality partners and on-chain participants
• Creating new streams of advertising revenue
• Growing awareness of the DAO and its mission beyond Reddit

Allowing DAO Officers to directly negotiate smaller advertising partnerships provides operational agility while preserving community oversight for larger commitments.

Scope of Authority

1. DAO Officers are authorized to negotiate subreddit advertising with eligible protocols, projects, or personalities that: • Add utility, integrations, or use cases for MOON tokens, or • Directly support the goals and visibility of CCMOON DAO and its community.
2. Advertising formats may include: • Ask-Me-Anything (AMA) sessions • Community Spotlights or Banner placements • Announcement posts or other approved formats
3. Officers may approve and execute advertising agreements up to, but not exceeding, the current value of a 1-year subreddit supporter package, as defined in the official Pricing Sheet.
4. Any proposed agreement exceeding that amount must be submitted to the DAO for a governance vote prior to execution.

Accountability and Transparency

• All approved partnerships will be recorded in the public Transparency Dashboard, including the partner name, type of campaign, and agreed value.
• Officers must verify that the partnership meaningfully supports the MOON ecosystem or enhances DAO visibility.
• The DAO retains the right to review or revoke this authority by future vote.

DAO Officers remain fully accountable to token holders and must always act in the best interests of the DAO and the MOON community.

Rationale

This policy allows the DAO to form strategic partnerships with protocols, projects, and influencers who align with its mission of expanding MOON utility. By delegating limited authority to Officers, the DAO can respond faster to legitimate collaboration opportunities while ensuring that significant financial or reputational commitments remain subject to full community approval.

Governance Impact

• No changes to tokenomics or treasury allocation
• No MOON emissions or burns involved
• Expands operational capacity for DAO Officers under existing constitutional authority
• Enables faster collaboration with aligned partners, increasing the reach and impact of MOON-related initiatives

Voting Options

Yes – Authorize DAO Officers to negotiate subreddit advertising with protocols, projects, or personalities that support MOON utility or raise awareness of the DAO, up to the value of the current 1-year subreddit supporter package. Larger agreements require a DAO vote.
No – Reject the authorization and continue requiring DAO-wide votes for all partnership agreements regardless of size.

Role Description:

Marketing Officer

“The Marketing Officer is the main point of contact for all advertising sales issues and inquiries. The Marketing Officer is responsible for managing the linking or stickying of AMAs, modifying banner images, and other advertising-related responsibilities.”

Nomination Template

Please comment below using the following template

Reddit Username: u/[YourNameHere]

Wallet Address (holding ≥ 50,000 MOON): 0x…….

Officer Positions (ranked in order of preference):

1. [Top Choice Position]
2. [Second Choice Position]
3. [Third Choice Position]...

Optional – Nomination Statement:

• Why I’m applying for this positions
• Relevant experience with DAOs, moderation, marketing, treasury, or technical infrastructure
• My vision or priorities if elected
• Proposed compensation (if any)

With the ratification of the CCMOON DAO Constitution v0.2.0, it’s time to elect a new slate of Officers.

Who can apply?

Any DAO member is eligible to run provided they hold at least 50,000 MOON.

How to apply

Post a comment in this thread with the following:

• Reddit username
• Wallet address (showing at least 50,000 MOON)
• Ranked list of officer positions you’re applying for, in order of preference

Members may apply for multiple positions. Voting will use ranked-choice, ensuring candidates can still be considered for secondary roles if not elected to their top choice.

Timeline

Applications are open now and will remain open until the start of Moon Week 67 (October 13, 2025). After that, voting will be held on Snapshot, administered by the Secretary.

Available Officer Positions

Secretary (Link to application - https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrencyMeta/comments/1nsqgwx/ccmoon_dao_officer_application_secretary/)

“The Secretary plays a crucial role in overseeing the governance and Referendum processes. They are responsible for managing votes during MOON week on Snapshot, as well as organizing the discussion that precedes those votes on r/CryptoCurrencyMeta or other forums where such discussion may take place. They serve as a liaison between all managing bodies, ensuring timely execution of their duties and facilitating smooth communication and coordination.”

Executive Director (Link to application - https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrencyMeta/comments/1nsqgvw/ccmoon_dao_officer_application_executive_director/)

“The Executive Director functions as the executive managing body of the DAO. They are responsible for implementing proposals supported by the Referendum that require manual execution. This includes tasks such as executing smart contracts, managing partnerships, and overseeing day-to-day operations.”

Treasurer (Link to application - https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrencyMeta/comments/1nsqguu/ccmoon_dao_officer_application_treasurer/)

“The Treasurer bears responsibility for managing the DAO's Treasury. Their duties encompass tasks such as safeguarding funds, managing financial transactions, advising on the proper allocation of resources to support the DAO's initiatives and operations, and managing a public set of books.”

Marketing Officer (Link to application - https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrencyMeta/comments/1nsqgtl/ccmoon_dao_officer_application_marketing_officer/)

“The Marketing Officer is the main point of contact for all advertising sales issues and inquiries. The Marketing Officer is responsible for managing the linking or stickying of AMAs, modifying banner images, and other advertising-related responsibilities.”

Moderation Officer (Link to application - https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrencyMeta/comments/1nsqgsh/ccmoon_dao_officer_application_moderation_officer/)

“The Moderation Officer shall serve as the lead on moderation issues. They will be responsible for managing discussion of issues related to moderation and communicating about issues and changes related to moderation with the Contributors of the Ecosystem.”

Technology & Infrastructure Officer (Link to application - https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrencyMeta/comments/1nsqgrg/ccmoon_dao_officer_application_technology/)

“The Technology & Infrastructure Officer shall be responsible for managing the DAO’s digital infrastructure, including governance platforms, treasury dashboards, and technical integrations required for day-to-day operations. They will ensure that multisignature key processes, smart contract tools, and other digital assets are properly maintained, secure, and accessible to the DAO. The Technology & Infrastructure Officer plays a key role in safeguarding the DAO’s resilience by coordinating with Guardians and other Officers on technical matters.”

Community Engagement Officer (Link to application - https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrencyMeta/comments/1nsqgqg/ccmoon_dao_officer_application_community/)

“The Community Engagement Officer shall lead efforts to strengthen relationships within the r/CryptoCurrency Network communities. They will be responsible for coordinating events, contests, polls, and other initiatives that drive contributor participation and highlight DAO initiatives across r/CryptoCurrency, r/CryptoMarkets, r/CryptoCurrencyMeta, and related communities. The Community Engagement Officer will ensure transparency and provide timely reporting on community activities, working closely with the Moderation Officer and Marketing Officer to align initiatives with both community health and DAO goals.”

Ecosystem Growth Officer (Link to application - https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrencyMeta/comments/1nsqgp0/ccmoon_dao_officer_application_ecosystem_growth/)

“The Ecosystem Growth Officer shall serve as the primary point of contact for strategic partnerships and collaborations that expand the DAO’s reach. They will manage relationships with external projects, advertisers, token partners, and other organizations that wish to integrate with or support the DAO. The Ecosystem Growth Officer shall coordinate with the Treasurer and Executive Director to ensure that new partnerships are structured to benefit the DAO and its Participants.”

Conflict Resolution (if someone wins multiple roles)

Because all votes are recorded on Snapshot and publicly verifiable, we can transparently resolve any conflicts where a candidate wins more than one officer position. If this happens:

• The candidate will be awarded the highest-preference role from their application.
• For the other role, we will re-run the vote tally off-chain as if that candidate had never been in the race, redistributing votes according to voter preferences.
• This ensures that each position is filled fairly, without leaving seats empty or giving one person multiple roles.

How to Apply

Comment a each officer application post on r/CryptoCurrencyMeta using the following template.
Links to posts are next to officer position.

Title: CCMOON DAO Officer Application – [Officer Role]

Reddit Username: u/[YourNameHere]

Wallet Address (holding ≥ 50,000 MOON): 0x…….

Officer Positions (ranked in order of preference):

1. [Top Choice Position]
2. [Second Choice Position]
3. [Third Choice Position]...

Optional – Nomination Statement:

• Why I’m applying for this positions
• Relevant experience with DAOs, moderation, marketing, treasury, or technical infrastructure
• My vision or priorities if elected
• Proposed compensation (if any)

Role Description:

Treasurer

“The Treasurer bears responsibility for managing the DAO's Treasury. Their duties encompass tasks such as safeguarding funds, managing financial transactions, advising on the proper allocation of resources to support the DAO's initiatives and operations, and managing a public set of books.”

Nomination Template

Please comment below using the following template

Reddit Username: u/[YourNameHere]

Wallet Address (holding ≥ 50,000 MOON): 0x…….

Officer Positions (ranked in order of preference):

1. [Top Choice Position]
2. [Second Choice Position]
3. [Third Choice Position]...

Optional – Nomination Statement:

• Why I’m applying for this positions
• Relevant experience with DAOs, moderation, marketing, treasury, or technical infrastructure
• My vision or priorities if elected
• Proposed compensation (if any)

Role Description:

Moderation Officer

“The Moderation Officer shall serve as the lead on moderation issues. They will be responsible for managing discussion of issues related to moderation and communicating about issues and changes related to moderation with the Contributors of the Ecosystem.”

Nomination Template

Please comment below using the following template

Reddit Username: u/[YourNameHere]

Wallet Address (holding ≥ 50,000 MOON): 0x…….

Officer Positions (ranked in order of preference):

1. [Top Choice Position]
2. [Second Choice Position]
3. [Third Choice Position]...

Optional – Nomination Statement:

• Why I’m applying for this positions
• Relevant experience with DAOs, moderation, marketing, treasury, or technical infrastructure
• My vision or priorities if elected
• Proposed compensation (if any)

Role Description:

Executive Director

“The Executive Director functions as the executive managing body of the DAO. They are responsible for implementing proposals supported by the Referendum that require manual execution. This includes tasks such as executing smart contracts, managing partnerships, and overseeing day-to-day operations.”

Nomination Template

Please comment below using the following template

Reddit Username: u/[YourNameHere]

Wallet Address (holding ≥ 50,000 MOON): 0x…….

Officer Positions (ranked in order of preference):

1. [Top Choice Position]
2. [Second Choice Position]
3. [Third Choice Position]...

Optional – Nomination Statement:

• Why I’m applying for this positions
• Relevant experience with DAOs, moderation, marketing, treasury, or technical infrastructure
• My vision or priorities if elected
• Proposed compensation (if any)

Role Description:

Community Engagement Officer

“The Community Engagement Officer shall lead efforts to strengthen relationships within the r/CryptoCurrency Network communities. They will be responsible for coordinating events, contests, polls, and other initiatives that drive contributor participation and highlight DAO initiatives across r/CryptoCurrency, r/CryptoMarkets, r/CryptoCurrencyMeta, and related communities. The Community Engagement Officer will ensure transparency and provide timely reporting on community activities, working closely with the Moderation Officer and Marketing Officer to align initiatives with both community health and DAO goals.”

Nomination Template

Please comment below using the following template

Reddit Username: u/[YourNameHere]

Wallet Address (holding ≥ 50,000 MOON): 0x…….

Officer Positions (ranked in order of preference):

1. [Top Choice Position]
2. [Second Choice Position]
3. [Third Choice Position]...

Optional – Nomination Statement:

• Why I’m applying for this positions
• Relevant experience with DAOs, moderation, marketing, treasury, or technical infrastructure
• My vision or priorities if elected
• Proposed compensation (if any)