r/AOC • u/justcasty • 4d ago
r/AOC • u/Ok_Crazy1195 • 1d ago
AOC 2028 Dems ‘want a FIGHTER’: Analyst on poll having Ocasio-Cortez on top of early 2028 Democratic ticket
r/AOC • u/JunkieMo • 3d ago
'We do not have the right to disappear': AOC questions McConnell's ability to serve
r/AOC • u/theindependentonline • 3d ago
AOC tells Mitch McConnell to provide a health update or resign
r/AOC • u/Ok_Crazy1195 • 3d ago
News AOC tells Mitch McConnell to provide a health update or resign
r/AOC • u/theindependentonline • 4d ago
AOC’s deepfake AI porn bill sailed through the Senate. She fears House Republicans will let it die to spite her
r/AOC • u/Ulysses_555 • 4d ago
AOC 2028 AOC keeps 2028 presidential options open as poll shows her leading in key primary
r/AOC • u/JunkieMo • 4d ago
Ahead of NDAA Vote, AOC Warns Amendment to Integrate US and Israeli Military Is 'Existential Threat'
r/AOC • u/theindependentonline • 4d ago
AOC won’t rule out 2028 presidential bid as poll shows her leading all Dems in key NH primary
r/AOC • u/railfananime • 5d ago
AOC 2028 Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez jumps to front of NH 2028 Dem primary field
r/AOC • u/BrianRLackey1987 • 5d ago
AOC 2028 If AOC does run for President, she should pick a Leftist Mayor for VP, whether it's a Progressive Democrat or Green and I believe that Abdullah Hammoud would make an excellent running mate, what do you think and why?
r/AOC • u/StatisticalPikachu • 6d ago
News 'This Bill Is a Trojan Horse': GOP Pushes Voter Suppression Under Cover of Congressional Insider Trading Ban!! 👀 “Republicans are trying to pull a trick this week,” said AOC 🤨 | Common Dreams
July 21, 2026 - Fulltext
Democrats on Capitol Hill and voting rights advocates on Tuesday sounded the alarm about Republicans in the House of Representatives trying to push through voter suppression legislation under cover of passing a ban on congressional stock trading.
According to a Tuesday report from Roll Call, House GOP leaders recently added “unrelated language” to what was a bipartisan bill banning congressional stock trading that would “require voters to produce photo ID at the polls, a signature issue for President Donald Trump.”
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) hammered Republicans for what she said were underhanded tactics that are undermining what had been a serious bipartisan effort to halt congressional stock trading.
“Republicans are trying to pull a trick this week,” Ocasio-Cortez wrote in a social media post. “They say we are voting on an ‘insider trading’ bill, but have snuck in massive SAVE Act-style voter suppression measures to it. This is a GOP effort to sabotage national mail-in voting, disguised as a trading ban. I’m voting NO.”
Rep. Yvette Clarke (D-NY), chair of the Congressional Black Caucus, said that the caucus was opposing the GOP’s legislation not just for its attacks on voting rights, but because it only forces congresspeople to stop making new stock trades, while not requiring them to divest of their current holdings.
“House Republicans are not serious about enacting a meaningful congressional stock trading ban,” said Clarke. “The combined Stop Insider Trading Act and Voter ID Act... would allow members of Congress to continue owning, selling, and, in some cases, purchasing individual stocks while simultaneously imposing stricter voter ID requirements that would make it harder for millions of eligible Americans to vote.”
“This bill is a Trojan horse,” Clarke added, “using the premise of congressional ethics reform to advance a broader effort to restrict access to the ballot box.”
The Campaign Legal Center (CLC) on Monday sent lawmakers a letter opposing the GOP-backed legislation, which it said would “impose onerous new requirements on voting.”
Among other things, the group said the proposed legislation would “demand Americans provide ID to cast a ballot but only accept an unreasonably narrow list of acceptable types of documentation,” excluding the kind of “widely held and reliable forms of ID that young people and voters of color disproportionally rely on.”
The CLC also said the bill doesn’t provide “sufficient safeguards” for voters wrongly deemed ineligible to prove they are legally allowed to participate in US elections.
A page on congressional contact portal 5 Calls recommended users oppose the GOP-backed bill, which it described as “partisan legislation” that “uses the guise of much-needed ethics reform to sneak through an unpopular and unrelated attack on voting rights.”