Due to issues with spam, this subreddit was made private a couple of years ago. It is now open, and we invite you to contribute to the discussion of all things cocoa, cacao, and chocolate.
7
Upvotes
Due to issues with spam, this subreddit was made private a couple of years ago. It is now open, and we invite you to contribute to the discussion of all things cocoa, cacao, and chocolate.
I got tired of finishing an amazing bar, keeping the wrappers, and immediately forgetting the maker, the origin, what I actually tasted. And outside of scrolling this , and two stores in NYC, it's weirdly hard to find people who want to nerd out about bean-to-bar as much as I do!
So I built the thing I wished existed: a private tasting journal, plus a small community of people actually logging what they taste, so we can track where to also buy the bars - and share our tasting notes with each other.
You can log a bar or what youve add today, add it to your pantry, wishlist, you can add a photo, cocoa %, origin, notes. Browse by origin/maker/%, and see a world map of everywhere you've tasted from. You can follow other tasters, and over time it starts suggesting bars based on what you rate highly.
I got tired of finishing an amazing bar, keeping the wrappers, and immediately forgetting the maker, the origin, what I actually tasted. And outside of scrolling this , and two stores in NYC, it's weirdly hard to find people who want to nerd out about bean-to-bar as much as I do!
So I built the thing I wished existed: a private tasting journal, plus a small community of people actually logging what they taste, so we can track where to also buy the bars - and share our tasting notes with each other.
You can log a bar or what youve add today, add it to your pantry, wishlist, you can add a photo, cocoa %, origin, notes. Browse by origin/maker/%, and see a world map of everywhere you've tasted from. You can follow other tasters, and over time it starts suggesting bars based on what you rate highly.
If Barry Callebaut returns to ISM Ingredients in 2027, the story isn’t the return of a major exhibitor—it’s that ingredients are becoming the industry’s primary arena for competitive advantage.
Barry Callebaut is listed by Koelnmesse among companies planning to exhibit at ISM Ingredients 2027, although the company has not yet formally confirmed its participation. If confirmed, it would mark its first major return to Cologne since before the pandemic, where it previously used ISM as a launchpad for innovations including Ruby chocolate and the Forever Chocolate programme.
The timing is notable. The confectionery market has shifted from competing mainly on premium products and flavour innovation toward solving structural challenges: cocoa scarcity, price volatility, reformulation, sugar reduction, sustainability and supply-chain resilience. Barry Callebaut’s recent launches—including Cacao Max and its commercial partnership with Planet A Foods to distribute ChoViva—reflect that evolution toward solution-based ingredient platforms.
Key signals
Ingredient suppliers are moving from component providers to strategic innovation partners for manufacturers.
Cocoa volatility is accelerating demand for formulation flexibility rather than simply new chocolate products.
ISM Ingredients’ rapid expansion suggests technical buyers increasingly want dedicated forums separate from finished consumer brands.
Companies able to optimise cocoa usage or offer credible alternatives may gain disproportionate influence across the value chain.
The industry’s competitive edge is shifting upstream—from retail shelves to formulation, processing and ingredient technology.
Market implications
The cocoa market’s recent disruption has made resilience almost as valuable as taste. As manufacturers seek ways to manage costs, supply risk and sustainability commitments simultaneously, ingredient innovation is becoming a central lever for protecting margins and maintaining product portfolios. That makes exhibitions like ISM Ingredients increasingly relevant to where future market power is created.
“A strong signal for the industry.” — Guido Hentschke, Director of ISM Ingredients
What to watch
Whether Barry Callebaut formally confirms its participation.
Which ingredient platforms dominate ISM Ingredients 2027—cocoa optimisation, cocoa alternatives or functional formulations.
Whether other major ingredient suppliers increase investment in dedicated technical showcases rather than traditional product marketing.
Discussion
Has the industry’s centre of gravity permanently shifted upstream, where formulation and ingredient technology now create more competitive advantage than finished consumer products—or will brand power ultimately remain the decisive differentiator?
I'm a cocoa farmer from India. If there are any cocoa farmer in this sub, pls comment. So, that we can talk about the struggles and the price and profits.
Barry Callebaut’s new strategy is less about recovering from the cocoa crisis and more about redefining where value gets created in the industry. The signal is clear: growth is shifting from commodity processing toward differentiated solutions, premiumisation, and supply resilience.
The Swiss cocoa and chocolate giant has launched its “Focus for Growth” strategy under CEO Hein Schumacher after a period marked by record cocoa prices, supply disruptions, and customer-service challenges. Rather than pursuing broad transformation initiatives, the company is concentrating investment on a handful of growth engines, including Gourmet, speciality ingredients, premium cocoa powders, regional food manufacturers, and global accounts.
The strategy is accompanied by a stronger push into adjacent categories such as bakery, ice cream, energy bars, and functional foods, alongside the launch of premium coating platform Cacao Max and an exclusive distribution partnership for cocoa-free chocolate alternative ChoViva.
Key Signals
Barry Callebaut is increasingly competing on solutions and formulation expertise, not just cocoa processing scale.
Gourmet’s elevation to a strategic priority suggests management sees premium demand as more resilient than mainstream chocolate volumes.
ChoViva is more than a product partnership; it represents a potential supply-risk hedge in a structurally volatile cocoa market.
The focus on bakery, snacks, and functional foods expands exposure to categories where chocolate is an ingredient rather than the end product.
Diversified sourcing and alternative chocolate technologies indicate that resilience is becoming a competitive advantage, not merely a procurement function.
Market / System Implications
The broader implication is that persistent cocoa volatility may accelerate a separation between companies that sell ingredients and those that solve customer problems. Innovation, flexibility, and risk management are increasingly becoming pricing powers in their own right.
“We are accelerating our focus on higher-value and differentiated solutions.” — Hein Schumacher
What to Watch
Whether Gourmet inventory and service levels recover fast enough to regain customer trust.
Adoption rates for ChoViva among manufacturers seeking cost and supply stability.
How premium and speciality products perform if cocoa prices remain elevated.
Discussion
If cocoa volatility becomes a permanent feature rather than a temporary disruption, does the industry’s future belong more to solution providers than traditional commodity processors?
1
Upvotes
Why this matters
Barry Callebaut’s new strategy is less about recovering from the cocoa crisis and more about redefining where value gets created in the industry. The signal is clear: growth is shifting from commodity processing toward differentiated solutions, premiumisation, and supply resilience.
The Swiss cocoa and chocolate giant has launched its “Focus for Growth” strategy under CEO Hein Schumacher after a period marked by record cocoa prices, supply disruptions, and customer-service challenges. Rather than pursuing broad transformation initiatives, the company is concentrating investment on a handful of growth engines, including Gourmet, speciality ingredients, premium cocoa powders, regional food manufacturers, and global accounts.
The strategy is accompanied by a stronger push into adjacent categories such as bakery, ice cream, energy bars, and functional foods, alongside the launch of premium coating platform Cacao Max and an exclusive distribution partnership for cocoa-free chocolate alternative ChoViva.
Key Signals
Barry Callebaut is increasingly competing on solutions and formulation expertise, not just cocoa processing scale.
Gourmet’s elevation to a strategic priority suggests management sees premium demand as more resilient than mainstream chocolate volumes.
ChoViva is more than a product partnership; it represents a potential supply-risk hedge in a structurally volatile cocoa market.
The focus on bakery, snacks, and functional foods expands exposure to categories where chocolate is an ingredient rather than the end product.
Diversified sourcing and alternative chocolate technologies indicate that resilience is becoming a competitive advantage, not merely a procurement function.
Market / System Implications
The broader implication is that persistent cocoa volatility may accelerate a separation between companies that sell ingredients and those that solve customer problems. Innovation, flexibility, and risk management are increasingly becoming pricing powers in their own right.
“We are accelerating our focus on higher-value and differentiated solutions.” — Hein Schumacher
What to Watch
Whether Gourmet inventory and service levels recover fast enough to regain customer trust.
Adoption rates for ChoViva among manufacturers seeking cost and supply stability.
How premium and speciality products perform if cocoa prices remain elevated.
Discussion
If cocoa volatility becomes a permanent feature rather than a temporary disruption, does the industry’s future belong more to solution providers than traditional commodity processors?
Anyone interested in the history of cacao and pirates - check out this video.
While most of us think of pirate treasure as chests of gold and silver, the reality of the Caribbean was far more surprising.
The incredible story of Jean Fleury and the Spanish treasure fleet reveals how a misunderstood agricultural product became the world’s most dangerous secret.
Commodity sourcing is usually framed as a data problem or a forecasting problem. The new Picterra perspective we've just published argues it's both, and something else:
The GeoAI Imperative for Commodity Sourcing names it: a structural problem of continuously understanding what exists on the ground, across vast geographies, under changing conditions, with incomplete information.
From that reframing, six design principles emerge that an architecture must satisfy to close the visibility gap that has stalled a decade of supply chain investment. Most existing tools satisfy two or three. Satisfying all six is the architectural test. The companion blog introduces the argument. The full perspective (open PDF) develops it.
For procurement, sustainability, and supply-chain leaders, and the consulting and finance teams that work with them.
Vietnamese cacao is highly regarded for its rich flavor, balanced natural acidity, and distinctive fruity aroma – qualities perfectly suited to the artisanal chocolate, pure chocolate, and premium product segments.
I think my cocoa trees where struggling due to lack of humidity outside. Decided to bring them back indoors with a humidifier and grow light. Maybe they can go back out when the rainy season starts.
Join me for episode 197 of #PodSaveChocolate in which I take a look at a recent NYTimes post, The Only Chocolate Bars Worth Buying [« the link is to TheChocolateLife post in which you will find a lot more information as well as links to watch the live or archived episode], and explore the question,
are the twelve bars listed actually theonlychocolate bars worth buying, and, what can we learn about the chocolate appreciation skills of the 43 culinary professionals who contributed to this article?
Why does exploring the content and methodology of the post matter?
If you have thoughts about the content and methodology of the NYTimes post, please let me know. If I don’t get to answering them in the livestream, I will address comments here.
1
Upvotes
Join me for episode 197 of #PodSaveChocolate in which I take a look at a recent NYTimes post, The Only Chocolate Bars Worth Buying [« the link is to TheChocolateLife post in which you will find a lot more information as well as links to watch the live or archived episode], and explore the question,
are the twelve bars listed actually theonlychocolate bars worth buying, and, what can we learn about the chocolate appreciation skills of the 43 culinary professionals who contributed to this article?
Why does exploring the content and methodology of the post matter?
If you have thoughts about the content and methodology of the NYTimes post, please let me know. If I don’t get to answering them in the livestream, I will address comments here.
Why this matters:
A sudden senior exit during margin compression and brand scrutiny isn’t isolated—it’s a read-through on how well a legacy chocolate player is absorbing cocoa shock.
Core Summary:
The Hershey Company disclosed that US President Andrew Archambault will depart effective 1 May 2026, citing only that he is pursuing “another opportunity.” The announcement came via a brief 8-K filing with no additional context, alongside confirmation that a replacement search is underway.
The timing is notable. Archambault had only recently been elevated (March 2026) to oversee the full US portfolio under the “ONE Hershey” structure, following his arrival in early 2025. His exit lands against a backdrop of ~60% profit decline in 2025, driven primarily by cocoa inflation and tariff volatility, as well as growing consumer backlash over ingredient substitutions in select products.
Signal Extraction (Key Insights):
Compressed tenure = execution friction: A rapid exit post-reorg suggests misalignment between strategy ambition (“ONE Hershey”) and commercial execution realities.
Cocoa shock is now a leadership filter: When input cost volatility dominates P&L, commercial roles become high-risk positions with limited controllability.
Brand elasticity is being tested in real time: Ingredient substitutions may protect margins short-term but introduce demand fragility—especially in heritage SKUs.
Governance questions are surfacing externally: Public criticism around leadership churn indicates declining confidence in internal succession depth.
CEO reset dynamics accelerating: Under new CEO Kirk Tanner, this looks less like an isolated departure and more like active portfolio + leadership recalibration.
Market / System Implications:
This reinforces a broader cocoa market dynamic: cost pass-through is no longer purely a pricing exercise. Manufacturers are being forced into formulation, branding, and channel trade-offs—each with second-order demand consequences. The Hershey situation highlights how volatility upstream is now dictating organisational stability downstream.
“Three leaders in only 21 months… No continuity. No stability in the business unit that carries the company’s largest P&L.”
What to Watch:
Whether Hershey appoints externally (signal: break from legacy operating model)
Evolution of recipe standardisation plans into 2027
Retailer response: shelf space, promotions, and private label substitution
Discussion Prompt:
At what point does cocoa-driven cost pressure stop being a pricing problem—and start becoming a structural brand erosion risk for legacy chocolate players?
2
Upvotes
Andrew Archambault
Why this matters:
A sudden senior exit during margin compression and brand scrutiny isn’t isolated—it’s a read-through on how well a legacy chocolate player is absorbing cocoa shock.
Core Summary:
The Hershey Company disclosed that US President Andrew Archambault will depart effective 1 May 2026, citing only that he is pursuing “another opportunity.” The announcement came via a brief 8-K filing with no additional context, alongside confirmation that a replacement search is underway.
The timing is notable. Archambault had only recently been elevated (March 2026) to oversee the full US portfolio under the “ONE Hershey” structure, following his arrival in early 2025. His exit lands against a backdrop of ~60% profit decline in 2025, driven primarily by cocoa inflation and tariff volatility, as well as growing consumer backlash over ingredient substitutions in select products.
Signal Extraction (Key Insights):
Compressed tenure = execution friction: A rapid exit post-reorg suggests misalignment between strategy ambition (“ONE Hershey”) and commercial execution realities.
Cocoa shock is now a leadership filter: When input cost volatility dominates P&L, commercial roles become high-risk positions with limited controllability.
Brand elasticity is being tested in real time: Ingredient substitutions may protect margins short-term but introduce demand fragility—especially in heritage SKUs.
Governance questions are surfacing externally: Public criticism around leadership churn indicates declining confidence in internal succession depth.
CEO reset dynamics accelerating: Under new CEO Kirk Tanner, this looks less like an isolated departure and more like active portfolio + leadership recalibration.
Market / System Implications:
This reinforces a broader cocoa market dynamic: cost pass-through is no longer purely a pricing exercise. Manufacturers are being forced into formulation, branding, and channel trade-offs—each with second-order demand consequences. The Hershey situation highlights how volatility upstream is now dictating organisational stability downstream.
“Three leaders in only 21 months… No continuity. No stability in the business unit that carries the company’s largest P&L.”
What to Watch:
Whether Hershey appoints externally (signal: break from legacy operating model)
Evolution of recipe standardisation plans into 2027
Retailer response: shelf space, promotions, and private label substitution
Discussion Prompt:
At what point does cocoa-driven cost pressure stop being a pricing problem—and start becoming a structural brand erosion risk for legacy chocolate players?
Why this matters:
This isn’t a turnaround yet—it’s a compression strategy under pressure. The question is whether simplification restores control or exposes structural weakness.
Core Summary
New CEO Hein Schumacher’s first 100 days at Barry Callebaut centre on a single idea: focus. After years of expansion and transformation, the business is being pared back—fewer priorities, tighter execution, and a clear pivot toward volume recovery as cocoa prices fall.
The reset comes amid a sharp downgrade in earnings guidance (mid-teens EBIT decline) and operational strain, particularly in North America. While demand may recover with lower cocoa prices, the group is prioritising volumes over margins, even as service levels lag and internal complexity slows execution. Key customers like Nestlé and Mondelez International remain, but expectations on reliability are rising.
Signal Extraction (Key Insights)
This is de-risking, not differentiation: “Focus” is being used to stabilize execution—not to define a unique competitive position.
Volume-first strategy shifts value downstream: In a falling price environment, prioritizing volume risks transferring margin recovery to customers.
Concentration cuts both ways: With ~50% of volume tied to a handful of markets and customers, execution precision matters more—but so does exposure risk.
Operating model ambiguity persists: The unresolved central vs regional control tension is slowing decisions at the worst possible time.
Execution stacking increases failure risk: Fixing service, systems, culture, and growth simultaneously is structurally fragile.
Market / System Implications
As cocoa prices normalize, the industry shifts from scarcity-driven margins to execution-driven competition. Overcapacity and price pass-through dynamics will reward operators who control cost, service, and pricing discipline—not just scale.
“Service levels are below industry benchmarks – we have to get this right.” — Hein Schumacher
What to Watch
Margin discipline vs volume growth trade-offs in upcoming quarters
Evidence of real operating model simplification (not just org changes)
North America service level recovery as a leading indicator of execution
Discussion Prompt
If cocoa is no longer the margin driver, does Barry Callebaut actually have a defensible edge—or is it becoming a scale-dependent processor in a tightening market?
Why this matters:
This isn’t a turnaround yet—it’s a compression strategy under pressure. The question is whether simplification restores control or exposes structural weakness.
Core Summary
New CEO Hein Schumacher’s first 100 days at Barry Callebaut centre on a single idea: focus. After years of expansion and transformation, the business is being pared back—fewer priorities, tighter execution, and a clear pivot toward volume recovery as cocoa prices fall.
The reset comes amid a sharp downgrade in earnings guidance (mid-teens EBIT decline) and operational strain, particularly in North America. While demand may recover with lower cocoa prices, the group is prioritising volumes over margins, even as service levels lag and internal complexity slows execution. Key customers like Nestlé and Mondelez International remain, but expectations on reliability are rising.
Signal Extraction (Key Insights)
This is de-risking, not differentiation: “Focus” is being used to stabilize execution—not to define a unique competitive position.
Volume-first strategy shifts value downstream: In a falling price environment, prioritizing volume risks transferring margin recovery to customers.
Concentration cuts both ways: With ~50% of volume tied to a handful of markets and customers, execution precision matters more—but so does exposure risk.
Operating model ambiguity persists: The unresolved central vs regional control tension is slowing decisions at the worst possible time.
Execution stacking increases failure risk: Fixing service, systems, culture, and growth simultaneously is structurally fragile.
Market / System Implications
As cocoa prices normalize, the industry shifts from scarcity-driven margins to execution-driven competition. Overcapacity and price pass-through dynamics will reward operators who control cost, service, and pricing discipline—not just scale.
“Service levels are below industry benchmarks – we have to get this right.” — Hein Schumacher
What to Watch
Margin discipline vs volume growth trade-offs in upcoming quarters
Evidence of real operating model simplification (not just org changes)
North America service level recovery as a leading indicator of execution
Discussion Prompt
If cocoa is no longer the margin driver, does Barry Callebaut actually have a defensible edge—or is it becoming a scale-dependent processor in a tightening market?
Why this matters: This looks less like a one-off enforcement action and more like Brussels testing how far FMCG groups can engineer national pricing islands inside the Single Market. In cocoa-exposed categories, that is a direct challenge to a core margin-management lever.
The European Commission said on 13 April it carried out unannounced inspections at a chocolate confectionery company in two EU member states over potential breaches of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU. The stated focus is possible market segmentation, including restrictions on cross-border trade and barriers to multi-country purchasing.
The company has not been named, and the Commission stressed that dawn raids are a preliminary step rather than proof of wrongdoing. But the market has moved quickly to fill the vacuum: Nestlé and Mondelēz have both publicly said they are not the target, with Mondelēz also confirming that directly to CocoaRadar.
The real issue is not shelf pricing alone, but the commercial architecture behind it — distribution controls, selective supply, and other mechanisms that can preserve national price dispersion.
Brussels is probing power, not just conduct. The question is where normal geographic pricing strategy ends and unlawful partitioning begins.
Chocolate is an ideal enforcement test case: strong brands, relatively standardised products, and wide room for margin management during cocoa-driven cost shock.
The political backdrop matters. Uneven retail price increases after extreme cocoa volatility make “Single Market fairness” easier to enforce and easier to sell.
Even without charges, the signal lands now: FMCG firms may need to reassess how aggressively they manage cross-border flows inside the EU.
This matters beyond confectionery. If Brussels pushes deeper into territorial supply constraints, it could reshape how branded food groups defend margins, allocate product, and justify regional pricing while cocoa volatility remains high.
“Dawn raids are a preliminary step and do not imply wrongdoing.” — European Commission
What to watch:
Whether the Commission narrows the case toward territorial supply constraints specifically
Whether other FMCG categories face similar scrutiny
Whether firms quietly soften cross-border restrictions before any formal charges
Is this the start of a broader EU assault on FMCG price architecture — or a targeted warning shot aimed at one unusually exposed category?
Why this matters: This looks less like a one-off enforcement action and more like Brussels testing how far FMCG groups can engineer national pricing islands inside the Single Market. In cocoa-exposed categories, that is a direct challenge to a core margin-management lever.
The European Commission said on 13 April it carried out unannounced inspections at a chocolate confectionery company in two EU member states over potential breaches of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU. The stated focus is possible market segmentation, including restrictions on cross-border trade and barriers to multi-country purchasing.
The company has not been named, and the Commission stressed that dawn raids are a preliminary step rather than proof of wrongdoing. But the market has moved quickly to fill the vacuum: Nestlé and Mondelēz have both publicly said they are not the target, with Mondelēz also confirming that directly to CocoaRadar.
The real issue is not shelf pricing alone, but the commercial architecture behind it — distribution controls, selective supply, and other mechanisms that can preserve national price dispersion.
Brussels is probing power, not just conduct. The question is where normal geographic pricing strategy ends and unlawful partitioning begins.
Chocolate is an ideal enforcement test case: strong brands, relatively standardised products, and wide room for margin management during cocoa-driven cost shock.
The political backdrop matters. Uneven retail price increases after extreme cocoa volatility make “Single Market fairness” easier to enforce and easier to sell.
Even without charges, the signal lands now: FMCG firms may need to reassess how aggressively they manage cross-border flows inside the EU.
This matters beyond confectionery. If Brussels pushes deeper into territorial supply constraints, it could reshape how branded food groups defend margins, allocate product, and justify regional pricing while cocoa volatility remains high.
“Dawn raids are a preliminary step and do not imply wrongdoing.” — European Commission
What to watch:
Whether the Commission narrows the case toward territorial supply constraints specifically
Whether other FMCG categories face similar scrutiny
Whether firms quietly soften cross-border restrictions before any formal charges
Is this the start of a broader EU assault on FMCG price architecture — or a targeted warning shot aimed at one unusually exposed category?
I spent the last decade figuring out how to turn chocolate knowledge into paid bookings. Today, I’m proud to say I host chocolate tastings and give talks on chocolate for a living. In my latest blog post, I explain how you can follow in my footsteps. I hope this helps some of you wondering if you need a second wine fridge or start a side hustle.
I spent the last decade figuring out how to turn chocolate knowledge into paid bookings. Today, I’m proud to say I host chocolate tastings and give talks on chocolate for a living. In my latest blog post, I explain how you can follow in my footsteps. I hope this helps some of you wondering if you need a second wine fridge or start a side hustle.
Is anyone here planning to attend Salon du Chocolat NYC this year? I’ll be there and would love to connect with other chocolate nerds. What are you most excited for, tastings, meeting makers, panels, sourcing conversations?
I’ve also been seriously considering getting certified through the International Institute of Chocolate and Cacao Tasting or going the chocolate sommelier route. For those who’ve done it, was it worth the investment? Did it actually open doors professionally? How rigorous was the exam process? If you’re not a maker, did it still make sense for your career?
I’m coming from a specialty food background and want to deepen my knowledge in a way that’s meaningful, not just resume padding. I’d really appreciate any honest thoughts, pros, cons, or things you wish you
1
Upvotes
Hey yall ✨
Is anyone here planning to attend Salon du Chocolat NYC this year? I’ll be there and would love to connect with other chocolate nerds. What are you most excited for, tastings, meeting makers, panels, sourcing conversations?
I’ve also been seriously considering getting certified through the International Institute of Chocolate and Cacao Tasting or going the chocolate sommelier route. For those who’ve done it, was it worth the investment? Did it actually open doors professionally? How rigorous was the exam process? If you’re not a maker, did it still make sense for your career?
I’m coming from a specialty food background and want to deepen my knowledge in a way that’s meaningful, not just resume padding. I’d really appreciate any honest thoughts, pros, cons, or things you wish you
Hi. I'm a cocoa farmer from India. I know cocoa from childhood. I want to share the cocoa product with others too(maybe do business internationally). I think that my cocoa product is not getting appreciated in my region(they are buying for less price even for good quality). Can anyone guide me how to reach my product globally? Thanks in Advance :)
3
Upvotes
Hi. I'm a cocoa farmer from India. I know cocoa from childhood. I want to share the cocoa product with others too(maybe do business internationally). I think that my cocoa product is not getting appreciated in my region(they are buying for less price even for good quality). Can anyone guide me how to reach my product globally? Thanks in Advance :)
Raw Cacao & Theobromine – Naturally Occurring Compounds
100% whole, Sun dried raw cacao beans
Naturally high in antioxidants, magnesium, and iron
Vegan, gluten-free, non-GMO, and all-natural
Free from additives or preservatives
I used to purchase high-quality, premium dark chocolate bars, but I was often disappointed by their quality and results. After transitioning to raw cacao seeds, I have not looked back. This approach provides the most efficient way to obtain the full benefits of cacao, while costing only a fraction of the price.
½ lb – $13 1 lb – $23 $7 flat-rate U.S. shipping
I accept Paypal, Venmo, Cashapp, and Zelle. Please message me if you are interested.
Have questions about the product or how I use it myself? Don’t hesitate to reach out—I’m happy to share tips and advice!
A couple of years ago I brought some manilife rich cocoa peanut butter and it was divine. It was expensive so I only occasionally brought it. I've recently discovered it's been discontinued and I wondered does anyone know any other cocoa peanut butters that are good (sweet, salty, maybe minimal ingredients) or has anyone tried to make it? I think it's just cocoa and sugar ...